10.07.2015 Views

histofthought1

histofthought1

histofthought1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The late Spanish scholastics 109Medina pointed out, theologians now admit that someone who guarantees adebtor's loan can licitly charge for that service; but in that case, if theborrower cannot find a guarantor, why cannot the lender charge the borrowerfor assuming the risk of non-repayment? Isn't his charge similar to the chargeof the guarantor?The argument was sound, but the shock to the scholastics was severe, noless so because Medina weakened his risk justification by banning interest onriskless loans and restricting the charge to cases where the borrower couldnot find a guarantor. Domingo de Soto, in horror, correctly pointed out that toadmit a charge for risk of non-payment would destroy the entire usury prohibition,since a charge could be made for a loan above the principal. Theusually more liberal Azpilcueta gave Medina even shorter shrift, objectingcorrectly if insufficiently, that every theologian, canon lawyer, and naturallawyer disagreed with Medina's innovation. And that was supposed to be theend of the matter.Medina's discussion of value theory, however, was not nearly so cogent. Indiscussing the just market price, Medina throws in higgledy-piggledy a hostof factors: costs, labour, industry, and risk for suppliers; need or utility forbuyers; and scarcity or abundance of the good. Clearly, there was much lessof a coherent analysis of supply than in the hands of San Bernardino of Siena.On the other hand, whereas the scholastic tradition held that the legal pricewould have to take precedence over the market price, Medina cited two caseswhere the market price should be followed: where the market price is lower,and where the authorities were too slow in adjusting the legal edict to ahigher market price.4.5 The School of Salamanca: the middle yearsThe institution and the structure of thought of the School of Salamanca wasestablished, then, in the first half of the sixteenth century by three greatDominicans: Francisco de Vitoria, and his followers, Domingo de Soto andMartin de Azpilcueta Navarrus. The latter two theologians were the foundersof the economic aspect of the systematic theology and philosophy of theSalamanca School.The middle generation of Salamancans were those men born in the firstdecades of the sixteenth century, and writing near and after mid-century. Theoldest of these second-generation members was the eminent Diego deCovarrubias y Leiva (1512-77) whose handsome and distinguished featuresgrace a stunning portrait by the great Spanish painter EI Greco, now hangingin the Greco Museum in Toledo. Acknowledged as the greatest jurist sinceVitoria, Covarrubias was the most prominent student ofAzpilcueta. After tenyears as professor of canon law at the University of Salamanca, Covarrubiaswas made auditor of the chancellor of Castile by the emperor, after which he

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!