10.07.2015 Views

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The results of a consultation are summarized by <strong>the</strong> FWS in a biologicalopinion. During <strong>the</strong> consultation, <strong>the</strong> FWS estimates <strong>the</strong> amount of take oflisted species that will occur incidental to <strong>the</strong> action. If <strong>the</strong> proposed actionwould result in incidental take, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> FWS may develop "reasonable andprudent measures" to minimize <strong>the</strong> level of take. The biological opinion stateswhe<strong>the</strong>r incidental take is authorized (assuming <strong>the</strong> reasonable and prudentmeasures are followed), and describes <strong>the</strong> permissible level of take. Thedescription of allowable take is called an incidental take statement.If <strong>the</strong> FWS concludes that <strong>the</strong> action is likely to jeopardize a species, or lead to<strong>the</strong> destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> FWSattempts to work with <strong>the</strong> action agency to develop reasonable and prudentalternatives. Reasonable and prudent alternatives are designed to allow <strong>the</strong>action to continue without jeopardizing <strong>the</strong> continued existence of <strong>the</strong> speciesor resulting in <strong>the</strong> destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat."Reasonable and prudent alternatives refer to alternative actions identifiedduring <strong>for</strong>mal consultation that can be implemented in a manner consistentwith <strong>the</strong> intended purpose of <strong>the</strong> action, that can be implementedconsistent with <strong>the</strong> scope of <strong>the</strong> federal agency's legal authority andjurisdiction, that is economically and technologically feasible, and that<strong>the</strong> director believes would avoid <strong>the</strong> likelihood of jeopardizing <strong>the</strong> continuedexistence of listed species or resulting in <strong>the</strong> destruction or adversemodification of critical habitat." (50 CFR 402.02.)Agencies are required by <strong>the</strong> Endangered Species Act to follow <strong>the</strong> provisions of<strong>the</strong> incidental take statement and to implement <strong>the</strong> reasonable and prudentmeasures. The act also requires agencies to avoid jeopardizing any listedspecies or causing destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat.Agencies may act on <strong>the</strong>ir own conclusions, however, about whe<strong>the</strong>r a proposedaction will have any of <strong>the</strong>se effects; <strong>the</strong>y do not have to accept <strong>the</strong>judgement of <strong>the</strong> FWS. There<strong>for</strong>e, once consultation is complete, agencies mayproceed with <strong>the</strong> action regardless of <strong>the</strong> outcome of <strong>the</strong> consultation as longas <strong>the</strong>y follow <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong> incidental take statement and <strong>the</strong> reasonableand prudent measures (if any).Fur<strong>the</strong>r consultation is not required except in <strong>the</strong> following situations:"Federal involvement or control over <strong>the</strong> action has been retained or isauthorized by law and:a) If <strong>the</strong> amount or extent of taking specified in <strong>the</strong> incidentaltake statement is exceeded;b) If new in<strong>for</strong>mation reveals effects of <strong>the</strong> action that mayaffect listed species or critical habitat in a manner or to anextent not previously considered;c) If <strong>the</strong> identified action is subsequently modified in a mannerthat causes an effect to <strong>the</strong> listed species that was notconsidered in <strong>the</strong> biological opinion; ord) If a new species is listed or critical habitat designated thatmay be affected by <strong>the</strong> identified action." (50 CFR 402.16)When a species has been proposed <strong>for</strong> listing or an area has been proposed <strong>for</strong>designation as critical habitat, a similar procedure, known as conference, isrequired. A conference results in an advisory report to <strong>the</strong> action agency, butdoes not provide an opinion regarding <strong>the</strong> likelihood of violation of section 7.The FWS also en<strong>for</strong>ces <strong>the</strong> Endangered Species Act's taking prohibitions andparticipates in conservation planning. Development of a conservation plan76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!