Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
Perry, D. 1991. The ecology of coarse woody debris in Pacific Northwestforests: overview, and the role of down logs in ecosystem processes. Departmentof Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.Stere, D.H. 1991. A discussion of forest stand simulators. Unpublishedmanuscript. Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, Oregon.Weatherspoon, P. and M. Ritchie. 1991. Silvicultural prescriptions for mixedconifer stands in northern California. Unpublished report submitted to theNorthern Spotted Owl Recovery Team.638
THE SECRETARYOF THE INTERIORW A S H I N G T O N/71 February 5, 1991MemorandumTo:From:Donald R. Knowles, Secretary's Representative andRecovery Team CoordinatorMarvin L. Plenert, Recovery Te a~rLead rThe SecretarySubject: Directive to No em Spotted Owl Recovery TeamPursuant to Section 4(f) of the Endangered Species Act, the goalof the recovery team effort is to develop a plan that will leadto the conservation and survival of the northern spotted owl. Thenorthern spotted owl recovery plan will serve as a guide to futureFederal, State and private activities affecting the owl and willbe designed to bring the owl to the point at which it will nolonger need the protection of the Endangered Species Act (Act).The requirements for recovery plans are specified in the Act:(i) a description of such site-specific managementactions as may be necessary to achieve the plan's goalfor the conservation and survival of the species;(ii) objective, measurable criteria which, when met,would result in a determination, in accordance with theprovisions of this section, that the species be removedfrom the list; and(iii) estimates of the time and cost to carry out thosemeasures needed to achieve the plan's goal and toachieve intermediate steps toward that goal.The planning process also must ensure that all availablescientific information is considered prior to the plan'scompletion. To the extent consistent with its legal mandate, theplan also should address concerns such as: potential communityand region-wide economic and social impacts; fiscal implicationsat the local, State and Federal levels; compatibility with otherlegal mandates; effects on other threatened and endangered speciesand those species which might be listed in the future; and broaderecosystem-related considerations.The recovery team has considerable latitude in which to carry outits task. The Act specifies no road map to recovery, nor does it639
- Page 604 and 605: Most significant late successionall
- Page 606 and 607: to evaluate options. Information in
- Page 608 and 609: Q0Table 1.1. Estimated acres and ow
- Page 610 and 611: soTable 1.3. Estimated acres and ow
- Page 612 and 613: 01CDarTable 1.5. Size class distrib
- Page 614 and 615: Table 1.8. Frequency distribution o
- Page 616 and 617: Literature CitedThomas, J.W., E.D.
- Page 618 and 619: 602
- Page 620 and 621: - The overlap of home ranges among
- Page 622 and 623: Table J.2. Acreage and owl numbers
- Page 624 and 625: continuedDCA Land AcreageIdent. Sta
- Page 626 and 627: Table J.4. Acreage and owl numbers
- Page 628 and 629: Table J.5. Acreage and owl numbers
- Page 630 and 631: Table J.6. Acreage and owl numbers
- Page 632 and 633: Table J.7. Acreage and owl numbers
- Page 634 and 635: Table J.9. Acrea ?e and owl numbers
- Page 636 and 637: Table J.10. Acreage and owl numbers
- Page 638 and 639: continued-DCA LandIdent. StatusAcre
- Page 640 and 641: -DCAIdent.LandStatusAcreageNRF Tota
- Page 642 and 643: 626
- Page 644 and 645: Experience Includes: Assistant Dire
- Page 646 and 647: Education: B.S. in forestry from Or
- Page 648 and 649: Team SupportCharles Bruce, Oregon D
- Page 650 and 651: continued-1 5-24-91 Other SpeciesSu
- Page 652 and 653: continued-9-16 thru9-20-919-19-91Sp
- Page 656 and 657: 2mandate the achievement of recover
- Page 658 and 659: 642
- Page 660 and 661: 644
- Page 662 and 663: Aspect - the direction a slope face
- Page 664 and 665: Congressionally classified and desi
- Page 666 and 667: Empirical - derived from direct obs
- Page 668 and 669: Hummocky - a landscape characterize
- Page 670 and 671: Mixed conifer - as used in this doc
- Page 672 and 673: Potential habitat - a stand of tree
- Page 674 and 675: Sensitive species - those species t
- Page 676 and 677: Take -Uunder the Endangered Species
- Page 678: wild, scenic, or recreational by an
Perry, D. 1991. The ecology of coarse woody debris in Pacific Northwest<strong>for</strong>ests: overview, and <strong>the</strong> role of down logs in ecosystem processes. Departmentof Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.Stere, D.H. 1991. A discussion of <strong>for</strong>est stand simulators. Unpublishedmanuscript. Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, Oregon.Wea<strong>the</strong>rspoon, P. and M. Ritchie. 1991. Silvicultural prescriptions <strong>for</strong> mixedconifer stands in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. Unpublished report submitted to <strong>the</strong>Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Spotted</strong> <strong>Owl</strong> <strong>Recovery</strong> Team.638