Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
Table 1.8. Frequency distribution of conservation areas based on number ofknown owl pair locations on federal land. Data are presented for various spottedowl conservation strategies for California.Number of Areas that Fall Within Specified Ranges of Numbers of KnownOwl Pair Locations (only owl locations on federal lands were tallied)Alternative 1 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 15 16 to 20 21 to 25 More than 25 Total'DCA 2 32 8 5 1 0 2 48HCA 28 8 3 2 0 2 43LSOG+OWL 17 4 2 1 2 3 29LSOG 22 4 3 1 1 1 32Only areas that contain known owl locations are reported in the table; totals do not equal the total number of areas.2 These numbers were taken directly from the geographic information system for comparison with other options. They may not match numbersreported in the main body of the draft recovery plan because they do not include adjustments made in the plan.DCA = designated conservation areaHCA = habitat conservation area delineated by ISCLSOG+OWL = most significant old-growth units plus owl additionsLSOG = most significant old-growth unitsTable 1.9. Frequency distribution of conservation areas based on number ofknown owl pair locations on federal land. Data are presented for various spottedowl conservation strategies for Oregon.Number of Areas that Fall Within Specified Ranges of Numbers of KnownOwl Pair Locations (only owl locations on federal lands were tallied)Alternative 1 to5 6to10 11 to15 16to20 21 to25 Morethan 25 Total 1DCA 2 18 12 8 9 4 4 55HCA 14 9 7 11 3 3 47LSOG+OWL 40 8 8 6 3 8 73LSOG 59 13 11 3 4 5 951 Only areas that contain known owl locations are reported in the table; totals do not equal the total number of areas.2 These numbers were taken directly from the geographic information system for comparison with other options. They may not match numbersreported in the main body of the draft recovery plan because they do not include adjustments made in the plan.DCA = designated conservation areaHCA = habitat conservation area delineated by ]SCLSOG+OWL = most significant old-growth units plus owl additionsLSOG = most significant old-growth units598
Table 1.10. Frequency distribution of conservation areas based on number ofknown owl pair locations on federal land. Data are presented for various spottedowl conservation strategies for Washington.Number of Areas that Fall Within Specified Ranges of Numbers of KnownOwl Pair Locations (only owl locations on federal lands were tallied)Alternative 1 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 15 16 to 20 21 to 25 More than 25 Total'DCA 2 28 11 3 1 0 1 44HCA 21 7 1 3 0 1 33LSOG+OWL 36 10 1 0 0 2 49LSOG 42 10 2 0 0 0 541 Only areas that contain known owl locations are reported in the table; totals do not equal the total number of areas.2 These numbers were taken directly from the geographic information system for comparison with other options. They may not match numbersreported in the main body of the draft recovery plan because they do not include adjustments made in the plan.DCA = designated conservation areaHCA = habitat conservation area delineated by ISCLSOG+OWL = most significant old-growth units plus owl additionsLSOG = most significant old-growth units........, . - .- I - -- -... 111.11.11, I ----- - ........ ....-.................................. I.." , -11 I................ I., I ... 11. 1 ... 1. .. -Table 1.11. Number of locations of other species and miles of streams (with fishstocks at risk) in different conservation options for the northern spotted owl.ISpeciesConservation Bald Miles ofStrategy Eagle Fisher Goshawk Marten Murrelet StreamsDCA 40 37 122 60 227 2,047HCA 45 38 111 51 155 2,118LSOG+OWL 40 40 114 63 205 1,968LSOG 33 32 82 49 177 1,189DCA = designated conservation areaHCA = habitat conservation area delineated by ISCLSOG+OWL = most significant old-growth units plus owl additionsLSOG = most significant old-growth units599
- Page 564 and 565: B. Potential Social Costs of Owl Co
- Page 566 and 567: The contrast between the behavior d
- Page 568 and 569: 0U1 n1nDTable H.2. Economic depende
- Page 570 and 571: cḻlTable H.4. Economic characteri
- Page 572 and 573: An analysis completed by the State
- Page 574 and 575: V. Preliminary Evaluation of the Ec
- Page 576 and 577: 25-° 20/0M 15-a)CLU)0 10-0CL 5 -0)
- Page 578 and 579: 25 -- 20-0co/o 15--Da)a0a)10m~ C) 5
- Page 580 and 581: forestlands. The costs of productio
- Page 582 and 583: In Figure H.8, the equilibrium betw
- Page 584 and 585: foregone and the way they will save
- Page 586 and 587: The income created by the purchase
- Page 588 and 589: Two concepts are useful for underst
- Page 590 and 591: y an estimate of the price that wou
- Page 592 and 593: Table H.10. Comparison of timber em
- Page 594 and 595: of the second year. The same assump
- Page 596 and 597: are generally much lower than for c
- Page 598 and 599: 582
- Page 600 and 601: studies at University of Washington
- Page 602 and 603: 586
- Page 604 and 605: Most significant late successionall
- Page 606 and 607: to evaluate options. Information in
- Page 608 and 609: Q0Table 1.1. Estimated acres and ow
- Page 610 and 611: soTable 1.3. Estimated acres and ow
- Page 612 and 613: 01CDarTable 1.5. Size class distrib
- Page 616 and 617: Literature CitedThomas, J.W., E.D.
- Page 618 and 619: 602
- Page 620 and 621: - The overlap of home ranges among
- Page 622 and 623: Table J.2. Acreage and owl numbers
- Page 624 and 625: continuedDCA Land AcreageIdent. Sta
- Page 626 and 627: Table J.4. Acreage and owl numbers
- Page 628 and 629: Table J.5. Acreage and owl numbers
- Page 630 and 631: Table J.6. Acreage and owl numbers
- Page 632 and 633: Table J.7. Acreage and owl numbers
- Page 634 and 635: Table J.9. Acrea ?e and owl numbers
- Page 636 and 637: Table J.10. Acreage and owl numbers
- Page 638 and 639: continued-DCA LandIdent. StatusAcre
- Page 640 and 641: -DCAIdent.LandStatusAcreageNRF Tota
- Page 642 and 643: 626
- Page 644 and 645: Experience Includes: Assistant Dire
- Page 646 and 647: Education: B.S. in forestry from Or
- Page 648 and 649: Team SupportCharles Bruce, Oregon D
- Page 650 and 651: continued-1 5-24-91 Other SpeciesSu
- Page 652 and 653: continued-9-16 thru9-20-919-19-91Sp
- Page 654 and 655: Perry, D. 1991. The ecology of coar
- Page 656 and 657: 2mandate the achievement of recover
- Page 658 and 659: 642
- Page 660 and 661: 644
- Page 662 and 663: Aspect - the direction a slope face
Table 1.8. Frequency distribution of conservation areas based on number ofknown owl pair locations on federal land. Data are presented <strong>for</strong> various spottedowl conservation strategies <strong>for</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia.Number of Areas that Fall Within Specified Ranges of Numbers of Known<strong>Owl</strong> Pair Locations (only owl locations on federal lands were tallied)Alternative 1 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 15 16 to 20 21 to 25 More than 25 Total'DCA 2 32 8 5 1 0 2 48HCA 28 8 3 2 0 2 43LSOG+OWL 17 4 2 1 2 3 29LSOG 22 4 3 1 1 1 32Only areas that contain known owl locations are reported in <strong>the</strong> table; totals do not equal <strong>the</strong> total number of areas.2 These numbers were taken directly from <strong>the</strong> geographic in<strong>for</strong>mation system <strong>for</strong> comparison with o<strong>the</strong>r options. They may not match numbersreported in <strong>the</strong> main body of <strong>the</strong> draft recovery plan because <strong>the</strong>y do not include adjustments made in <strong>the</strong> plan.DCA = designated conservation areaHCA = habitat conservation area delineated by ISCLSOG+OWL = most significant old-growth units plus owl additionsLSOG = most significant old-growth unitsTable 1.9. Frequency distribution of conservation areas based on number ofknown owl pair locations on federal land. Data are presented <strong>for</strong> various spottedowl conservation strategies <strong>for</strong> Oregon.Number of Areas that Fall Within Specified Ranges of Numbers of Known<strong>Owl</strong> Pair Locations (only owl locations on federal lands were tallied)Alternative 1 to5 6to10 11 to15 16to20 21 to25 Morethan 25 Total 1DCA 2 18 12 8 9 4 4 55HCA 14 9 7 11 3 3 47LSOG+OWL 40 8 8 6 3 8 73LSOG 59 13 11 3 4 5 951 Only areas that contain known owl locations are reported in <strong>the</strong> table; totals do not equal <strong>the</strong> total number of areas.2 These numbers were taken directly from <strong>the</strong> geographic in<strong>for</strong>mation system <strong>for</strong> comparison with o<strong>the</strong>r options. They may not match numbersreported in <strong>the</strong> main body of <strong>the</strong> draft recovery plan because <strong>the</strong>y do not include adjustments made in <strong>the</strong> plan.DCA = designated conservation areaHCA = habitat conservation area delineated by ]SCLSOG+OWL = most significant old-growth units plus owl additionsLSOG = most significant old-growth units598