10.07.2015 Views

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

are generally much lower than <strong>for</strong> commercial harvest and that migrantlaborers often are used <strong>for</strong> such work. If <strong>the</strong> employment created by a silviculturalprogram is to benefit workers displaced from <strong>the</strong> harvesting timber,employment preferences may need to be made a requirement of <strong>the</strong> contractslet <strong>for</strong> such work.5. Estimating <strong>the</strong> Economic Effects of Salvage.As described in section III, <strong>the</strong> recovery plan allows limited salvage within <strong>the</strong>DCAs. Forest Service and BLM timber salvage sales averaged more than 650million board feet per year during <strong>the</strong> 1980s. A rough estimate of <strong>the</strong> economiceffects of allowing salvage was made by assuming an annual potential salvageof 600 million board feet total, of which <strong>the</strong> DCAs would contain approximatelyone third. The guidelines <strong>for</strong> salvage in DCAs are set <strong>for</strong>th in section III. C. Itwas assumed that <strong>the</strong> guidelines would allow 10 to 20 percent of <strong>the</strong> potentialsalvage, leaving <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> dead trees to contribute to maintenance ofhabitat conditions. Annual salvage in DCAs could yield 20 to 40 million boardfeet. The total job coefficients <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> timber counties range from eight to justmore than 17 jobs per million board feet, averaging 15.7. At <strong>the</strong> average totaljob coefficient, salvage in DCAs could support 315 to 630 workers.6. Estimating <strong>the</strong> Effects on County Revenues.In its analysis of <strong>the</strong> effects of <strong>the</strong> critical habitat designation, <strong>the</strong> FWS developedmethods to estimate <strong>the</strong> price effect of restrictions in timber harvest andits effect on <strong>the</strong> federal receipts from <strong>the</strong> remaining timber volume. The FWSalso worked with <strong>the</strong> Forest Service and BLM to develop <strong>the</strong> computationalmethods needed to allocate <strong>the</strong> estimated federal timber sale revenues to <strong>the</strong>counties with which federal receipts are shared. These methods were used toestimate <strong>the</strong> effects of <strong>the</strong> DCAs in <strong>the</strong> recovery plan on <strong>the</strong> timber revenuesthat would be received by <strong>the</strong> counties. These estimates are inTable H. 13.These preliminary estimates do not include <strong>the</strong> effects of asset losses on <strong>the</strong>tax bases of <strong>the</strong> counties.Table H.12. Economic effects of silviculture in designated conservation areas.TimberAcres Removed AnnualTreated Annually EconomicAnnually (million Employment Benefitboard feet) Uobs) ($mllilon)10,000 19 120 525,000 48 302 1350,000 96 600 26100,000 192 1200 53Target Acreage: 450,000 acres currently unsuitable <strong>for</strong> owl habitat580

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!