Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

10.07.2015 Views

of the second year. The same assumptions were used for the preliminaryestimates of wage losses due to the implementation of the draft recovery plan.The assumption that 92 percent of unemployed workers would be reemployedby the end of the first year was derived from general unemployment data (seeMead et al. 1990) and probably overstates the rate or reemployment of timberindustry workers displaced by permanent restrictions in timber harvest imposedto protect owl habitat. The wage losses from implementation of therecovery plan were estimated to be $1.42 billion. Wage losses for the currentregime (planned implementation of the ISC strategy, the effects of listing, andthe critical habitat designation) were estimated to be $1.46 billion.4. Estimating the Economic Effects of SilviculturalPractices.The recovery plan provides for the use of silvicultural techniques in DCAs forthe purpose of promoting more rapid development of forest characteristicsfavorable to the owl in stands that do not currently have the characteristics ofsuitable habitat. In general, younger stands would be thinned in a mannerthat promotes more rapid development of larger trees and other structuralcharacteristics of suitable owl habitat. These techniques are described andevaluated in Appendix G.The implementation of silvicultural practices in DCAs is one of the features ofthe recovery plan with potential to reduce the undesirable economic effects ofprotecting owl habitat, particularly during the first decade. The direct economiceffects of silvicultural practices result from the equipment and laborcosts of silvicultural operations, such as thinning, and the removal of timberfrom younger stands that can be sold commercially.There are also important indirect effects that could be of significant benefit overthe long run. It appears that properly designed silvicultural treatments will beable to significantly shorten the time needed for the development of suitablehabitat in regenerated forests. Such practices would mean that stands wouldprovide suitable habitat for owls for a longer period of time. If widely appliedover many decades, particularly in concert with longer rotations and selectiveharvest techniques, it may be possible to evolve a forest landscape to support aviable owl population with much less reduction in timber harvests than otherwisewould be needed.The variable that most strongly affects the economic benefits of silviculturaltreatments is the percent of timber that is removed and sold commercially.The thinning prescriptions specify the density of the stand in trees per acreafter thinning. The design of the treatment identifies trees to be cut, leavingsufficient trees to meet the density standard. The design also will specify thepercentage of such trees to be removed, left standing, and left on the ground.These design parameters will depend on the characteristics of the stand andthe requirements specified for promoting the development of suitable owlhabitat.If no timber is removed during thinning, then the costs of the treatment willnot be offset by timber revenues and will need to be borne by agency budgets.Employment will result from the thinning itself, but not from hauling or millingof timber. As the amount of timber removed during thinning is increased, therevenues increase and the employment in hauling and milling logs increases.For each stand, there is a breakeven point which depends on costs of operatingon that site, the transportation costs, the diameter of the trees to be removed,and the price of logs. Above the breakeven point, the silvicultural treatment iscommercially viable and could be performed under a contract in which the578

proceeds from sale of the timber removed cover the costs. Any surplus wouldbe bid away to the benefit of the government if such contracts were auctionedlike timber sales.Estimates of the costs and returns of various silvicultural practices in varioustypes of stands were developed by Chadwick Oliver of the University of Washington(Oliver 1991). The costs and returns per acre for various silviculturalsystems are in Table G. 1 of Appendix G. A typical regime is the low densitysystem for west side 30-year-old stands. This treatment calls for thinning to100 trees per acre at age 30 with subsequent removal of 20 trees per acre atage 50 and again at age 70. The total undiscounted costs with no removal oftimber are estimated to be about $340 per acre and the returns (above costs) ifall thinned threes are removed are estimated to be about $7,165 per acre.Although relatively few trees are removed in the second and third thinnings,most of the returns result from sale of that timber since the trees removed aremuch larger. If the costs and returns from thinning at ages 50 and 70 arediscounted to present value at the time of the first thinning using an 8 percentdiscount rate, the costs with no removal become $53 per acre and the returnswith full removal become $1,109 per acre. In addition, it was estimated thatimplementing this prescription uses, on average, about 3.64 person-years peracre and could produce a maximum of about 3,833 board feet per acre.For purposes of estimating the potential economic effects of silviculturalpractices within DCAs, the costs and returns for the low density system on 30-year-old stands shown in Table G. 1 of Appendix G were assumed to be the endpoints of a linear relationship starting at 0 percent and ending at 100 percent.It was assumed that 50 percent of the thinned trees would be removed onaverage.Estimates of the acreage in DCAs that would be an appropriate target for suchpractices were developed by using estimates of unsuitable habitat acres inDCAs from the Recovery Team's GIS (geographic information system). Unsuitablehabitat in the DCAs accounts for nearly 2.5 million acres. Since only* those stands of age 30 to 40 years or less than 11 inches dbh would makegood targets, information on the age and size distribution of stands in thenational forests and O&C lands was used to determine the percentage ofunsuitable habitat likely to be an appropriate age during the 1990s (USDA1991b,c,d, and USDI 1990). For purposes of estimating the economic effects ofsilvicultural treatments, it was assumed that 15 percent of unsuitable habitaton Forest Service lands and 30 percent on BLM lands would be appropriate forsilvicultural treatment. The resulting target acreage is about 450,000 acres.Implementation of silvicultural practices to promote development of suitableowl habitat will be the responsibility of the land management agencies, theBLM and Forest Service. The rate of treatment of the target acreage willdepend on administrative and budgetary factors that the Recovery Teamcannot accurately anticipate. To show the range of potential economic effectsfrom an aggressive program of silvicultural treatment to a go-slow approach,various assumptions were made regarding the percent of target acreage thatwould be treated in each year during the first decade of the recovery planimplementation.Estimates for the employment and economic gains from a program of silviculturaltreatment in DCAs are in Table H. 12. The economic gains are substantial.Even under the assumption that only 50 percent of the thinned trees willbe removed, a program treating 50,000 acres per year would yield about 100million board feet per year and create net benefits of more than $26 million peryear. The employment created by such a program also could be significant,about 600 jobs. It is important to note, however, that the wages for thinning579

of <strong>the</strong> second year. The same assumptions were used <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> preliminaryestimates of wage losses due to <strong>the</strong> implementation of <strong>the</strong> draft recovery plan.The assumption that 92 percent of unemployed workers would be reemployedby <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> first year was derived from general unemployment data (seeMead et al. 1990) and probably overstates <strong>the</strong> rate or reemployment of timberindustry workers displaced by permanent restrictions in timber harvest imposedto protect owl habitat. The wage losses from implementation of <strong>the</strong>recovery plan were estimated to be $1.42 billion. Wage losses <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> currentregime (planned implementation of <strong>the</strong> ISC strategy, <strong>the</strong> effects of listing, and<strong>the</strong> critical habitat designation) were estimated to be $1.46 billion.4. Estimating <strong>the</strong> Economic Effects of SilviculturalPractices.The recovery plan provides <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> use of silvicultural techniques in DCAs <strong>for</strong><strong>the</strong> purpose of promoting more rapid development of <strong>for</strong>est characteristicsfavorable to <strong>the</strong> owl in stands that do not currently have <strong>the</strong> characteristics ofsuitable habitat. In general, younger stands would be thinned in a mannerthat promotes more rapid development of larger trees and o<strong>the</strong>r structuralcharacteristics of suitable owl habitat. These techniques are described andevaluated in Appendix G.The implementation of silvicultural practices in DCAs is one of <strong>the</strong> features of<strong>the</strong> recovery plan with potential to reduce <strong>the</strong> undesirable economic effects ofprotecting owl habitat, particularly during <strong>the</strong> first decade. The direct economiceffects of silvicultural practices result from <strong>the</strong> equipment and laborcosts of silvicultural operations, such as thinning, and <strong>the</strong> removal of timberfrom younger stands that can be sold commercially.There are also important indirect effects that could be of significant benefit over<strong>the</strong> long run. It appears that properly designed silvicultural treatments will beable to significantly shorten <strong>the</strong> time needed <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> development of suitablehabitat in regenerated <strong>for</strong>ests. Such practices would mean that stands wouldprovide suitable habitat <strong>for</strong> owls <strong>for</strong> a longer period of time. If widely appliedover many decades, particularly in concert with longer rotations and selectiveharvest techniques, it may be possible to evolve a <strong>for</strong>est landscape to support aviable owl population with much less reduction in timber harvests than o<strong>the</strong>rwisewould be needed.The variable that most strongly affects <strong>the</strong> economic benefits of silviculturaltreatments is <strong>the</strong> percent of timber that is removed and sold commercially.The thinning prescriptions specify <strong>the</strong> density of <strong>the</strong> stand in trees per acreafter thinning. The design of <strong>the</strong> treatment identifies trees to be cut, leavingsufficient trees to meet <strong>the</strong> density standard. The design also will specify <strong>the</strong>percentage of such trees to be removed, left standing, and left on <strong>the</strong> ground.These design parameters will depend on <strong>the</strong> characteristics of <strong>the</strong> stand and<strong>the</strong> requirements specified <strong>for</strong> promoting <strong>the</strong> development of suitable owlhabitat.If no timber is removed during thinning, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> costs of <strong>the</strong> treatment willnot be offset by timber revenues and will need to be borne by agency budgets.Employment will result from <strong>the</strong> thinning itself, but not from hauling or millingof timber. As <strong>the</strong> amount of timber removed during thinning is increased, <strong>the</strong>revenues increase and <strong>the</strong> employment in hauling and milling logs increases.For each stand, <strong>the</strong>re is a breakeven point which depends on costs of operatingon that site, <strong>the</strong> transportation costs, <strong>the</strong> diameter of <strong>the</strong> trees to be removed,and <strong>the</strong> price of logs. Above <strong>the</strong> breakeven point, <strong>the</strong> silvicultural treatment iscommercially viable and could be per<strong>for</strong>med under a contract in which <strong>the</strong>578

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!