Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

10.07.2015 Views

foregone and the way they will save costs by not preparing for timber sales onthe reserved lands.Private timber producers also would benefit from receiving a higher price onthe timber they would harvest even if there is no owl conservation. In FigureH. 11, this is represented by Area C equal to (Pf - P,) x (Ql -Qfd + Q'). As is thecase for federal timber, this gain is offset by losses to timber consumers.Private producers would also harvest at a higher rate in the case with federalowl habitat conservation in response to the higher price, Pr The additionalharvest is shown in Figure H. 11 as (Qf -Q,). This harvest is achieved at highercost, however, as represented by the area under the supply curve, Sf from Q, toQf. The profit on this additional production is relatively small because of itshigh cost. It is equal to the area representing the additional revenues, Pox (Q. -Q 1 ) less the area representing the additional costs. The profit on the additionalprivate production is shown in Figure H. 11 as the small triangular Area Dunder price line Pf but above Sf between Q, and Qf.Although both the federal government and private timber owners benefit fromthe price increase, consumers of timber, such as sawmills and plywood mills,lose. To determine the total effect on the economy, we must estimate theeffects on timber consumers as well as producers. Mills lose because thehigher price of logs that results if timber harvest on federal lands is restrictedby protection of owl habitat causes lower profits.The graphic analysis of the effects on timber consumers is shown in FigureH. 12. If there were no owl conservation, the timber buyers' benefits are representedby the roughly triangular area with corners at PO, Id and E 0 . If owlconservation restricts timber supply, the timber buyers' benefits are representedby the roughly triangular area with corners at P., Id and E,. The lossesexperienced by timber buyers are represented by the difference between thetwo triangles, shown as Area E.IDa).0Eo tS Sa)C-,TPtP 0Q1 Qfd QI Q~ QORate of timber harvest.11111 .........- I " Ill ., I I......... - IFigure H.12. Price-induced losses in benefitsfrom milfing.568

Careful examination of Figures H. 10, H. 11, and H. 12 shows that all of theareas representing price-induced gains to the federal government (Area B inFigure H. 10) and the private timber producers (Areas C and D in Figure H. 1 1)are part of Area E in Figure H. 12 representing losses to timber buyers. Thus,the price-induced gains to timber owners are achieved at the expense of timberbuyers. Moreover, the losses to timber buyers exceed the price-induced gainsto timber producers by Area F shown in Figure H. 13.Figure H. 13 shows the graphical representation of the total cost from loss intimber production due to habitat conservation. The total cost is the sum ofArea A, the loss of economic benefits on the federal timber that will not beharvested, and Area F, the net loss caused by timber price increases. Thesecosts reflect all of the effects on the national economy that occur in timbermarkets. If all of the costs of harvesting timber, including all environmentalcosts, such as lost recreational opportunities and effects on water quality, werepaid for by firms harvesting timber and were reflected in the supply curve, thenthe losses shown in Figure H. 13 would be the total national costs of protectingowl habitat. Because such costs are external to transactions in the timbermarket, the reduced environmental costs caused by reduced timber harvestmust be estimated separately.The economic effects of protecting owl habitat can be viewed from the regionalas well as the national perspective. This requires an accounting of the effectson the regional share of the national economic benefits created by timberharvesting as well as for the effects on regional income generated by thepurchase of labor, equipment, and services for the harvesting and processingof timber.The region shares in the benefits from timber harvesting, shown in Figure H.6,in several ways. First, counties receive 25 percent to 50 percent of federaltimber sales receipts. Second, firms that own forestland in the region earnprofits on timber they harvest. State governments also receive revenue fromtimber harvest on state lands. The effects of owl habitat protection on theseregional shares of the benefits from timber harvesting can be analyzed usingthe concepts shown in Figures H.9, H. 10, and H. 11._ IDCDE0)Pf0 +--AcooRate of timber harvest)i Qf Q 0/.1 .................... --- - I ---...-.111.1.111.1.11Figure H.13. Total economic losses from reduction infederal timber harvest.569

<strong>for</strong>egone and <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong>y will save costs by not preparing <strong>for</strong> timber sales on<strong>the</strong> reserved lands.Private timber producers also would benefit from receiving a higher price on<strong>the</strong> timber <strong>the</strong>y would harvest even if <strong>the</strong>re is no owl conservation. In FigureH. 11, this is represented by Area C equal to (Pf - P,) x (Ql -Qfd + Q'). As is <strong>the</strong>case <strong>for</strong> federal timber, this gain is offset by losses to timber consumers.Private producers would also harvest at a higher rate in <strong>the</strong> case with federalowl habitat conservation in response to <strong>the</strong> higher price, Pr The additionalharvest is shown in Figure H. 11 as (Qf -Q,). This harvest is achieved at highercost, however, as represented by <strong>the</strong> area under <strong>the</strong> supply curve, Sf from Q, toQf. The profit on this additional production is relatively small because of itshigh cost. It is equal to <strong>the</strong> area representing <strong>the</strong> additional revenues, Pox (Q. -Q 1 ) less <strong>the</strong> area representing <strong>the</strong> additional costs. The profit on <strong>the</strong> additionalprivate production is shown in Figure H. 11 as <strong>the</strong> small triangular Area Dunder price line Pf but above Sf between Q, and Qf.Although both <strong>the</strong> federal government and private timber owners benefit from<strong>the</strong> price increase, consumers of timber, such as sawmills and plywood mills,lose. To determine <strong>the</strong> total effect on <strong>the</strong> economy, we must estimate <strong>the</strong>effects on timber consumers as well as producers. Mills lose because <strong>the</strong>higher price of logs that results if timber harvest on federal lands is restrictedby protection of owl habitat causes lower profits.The graphic analysis of <strong>the</strong> effects on timber consumers is shown in FigureH. 12. If <strong>the</strong>re were no owl conservation, <strong>the</strong> timber buyers' benefits are representedby <strong>the</strong> roughly triangular area with corners at PO, Id and E 0 . If owlconservation restricts timber supply, <strong>the</strong> timber buyers' benefits are representedby <strong>the</strong> roughly triangular area with corners at P., Id and E,. The lossesexperienced by timber buyers are represented by <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong>two triangles, shown as Area E.IDa).0Eo tS Sa)C-,TPtP 0Q1 Qfd QI Q~ QORate of timber harvest.11111 .........- I " Ill ., I I......... - IFigure H.12. Price-induced losses in benefitsfrom milfing.568

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!