10.07.2015 Views

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In Figure H.8, <strong>the</strong> equilibrium between <strong>the</strong> supply curve with owl habitatconservation, S., and <strong>the</strong> demand curve, D, is shown at E, with <strong>the</strong> timberprice, Pf., higher than P. and timber harvest, Qr With owl conservation, <strong>the</strong>harvest rate, Qf, is less than Q. but greater than Q,, <strong>the</strong> harvest rate equal to(Q. - Q') that would occur if <strong>the</strong>re were no increase in <strong>the</strong> private harvest ratein response to <strong>the</strong> restriction in federal harvest. These features of Figure H.8can be used to estimate <strong>the</strong> direct economic effects of <strong>the</strong> removal of <strong>for</strong>estlandfrom <strong>the</strong> timber base to protect <strong>the</strong> owl.The basic concepts <strong>for</strong> analysis of <strong>the</strong> economic effects caused by owl habitatconservation are <strong>the</strong> economic rent realized from timber harvest and <strong>the</strong>consumers' surplus. The graphic representation of economic rent is shown inFigure H.6. The hatched area represents <strong>the</strong> sum of <strong>the</strong> profits landownerswould realize from harvest on all of <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>estlands contributing to <strong>the</strong> annualharvest. These lands range from those with low costs that yield high profits too<strong>the</strong>rs with costs nearly equal to <strong>the</strong> price which logs bring that yield almostno profit. The graphic representation of <strong>the</strong> consumers' surplus is shown inFigure H.7. The hatched area represents <strong>the</strong> sum of mill profits ranging from<strong>the</strong> high profits earned by <strong>the</strong> most efficient mills to nearly zero profits earnedby economically marginal mills with high costs.The federal government will not, of course, produce economic benefits orreceive revenues <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> portion of its timber that is on land reserved <strong>for</strong> owlhabitat and must go unharvested. The economic benefit that would resultfrom this harvest is equal to <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong> logs thatwould be produced and <strong>the</strong> cost of harvesting. This benefit is represented byArea A approximately equal to (P. - C) x Q' in Figure H.9. The removal offederal <strong>for</strong>estland from <strong>the</strong> timber base to provide owl habitat causes economiclosses equal to this unrealized benefit.The economic benefits from <strong>the</strong> federal timber harvest that continues despiteprotection of owl habitat would be higher, however, because of <strong>the</strong> higher priceof timber. The gain resulting from <strong>the</strong> higher timber price is shown in Figure/~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~E0CD0~Q1 Qfd 0Q Rate of timber harvest566Figure H.9. Economic benefit <strong>for</strong>egone by reduction infederal timber harvest.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!