10.07.2015 Views

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A. Previously Estimated Economic Costs of <strong>Owl</strong>Conservation ProposalsThe <strong>Recovery</strong> Team reviewed six major studies of <strong>the</strong> economic effects of owlconservation. This was done to gain a better understanding of <strong>the</strong> factors thatcontribute to <strong>the</strong> high cost of protecting <strong>the</strong> owl and to identify analytic methods,assumptions, and data that could be used in producing economic in<strong>for</strong>mationabout <strong>the</strong> recovery plan. These studies are summarized briefly.1. The Economic Consequences of Preserving Old-Growth Timber<strong>for</strong> <strong>Spotted</strong><strong>Owl</strong>s in Oregon and Washington. Walter J. Mead et al., University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia,Santa Barbara. October 1990.This study provided a comprehensive analysis of <strong>the</strong> economic effects ofpreserving <strong>the</strong> remaining old-growth <strong>for</strong>ests of Oregon and Washington toprovide habitat <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> owl. In addition to <strong>the</strong> nearly 2 million acres of oldgrowthalready set aside in preserves, such as national parks and wildernessareas, <strong>the</strong> proposal would protect from harvesting all o<strong>the</strong>r old-growth, estimatedhere to be more than 4 million acres. A harvest reduction of 2,257million board feet on federal lands is estimated to be partially offset in earlyyears by increased harvest from younger <strong>for</strong>ests on private lands.The estimated net cost of this proposal during <strong>the</strong> next 50 years is $24.5 billion(discounted to present value at 4 percent). Direct job losses are estimated tobe as high as 18,000 jobs.The Mead study provided estimates of <strong>the</strong> following economic effects:* The value of <strong>for</strong>egone old-growth timber harvest,* The value of <strong>for</strong>egone second-growth timber harvest that would have beengrown on lands from which old-growth is cut,* The loss in <strong>the</strong> value of capital equipment, primarily saw mills,* The loss in <strong>the</strong> value of labor due to unemployment and reemployment atlower wages,* The increased value of recreation in old-growth <strong>for</strong>ests.2. Social and Economic Impacts of <strong>Spotted</strong> <strong>Owl</strong> Conservation Strategy. John H.Beuter et al., <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> American Forest Resource Alliance, 1990.The Beuter study examined <strong>the</strong> economic, social, and cultural effects of <strong>the</strong>conservation strategy <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn spotted owl prepared by <strong>the</strong> InteragencyScientific Committee (ISC) (Thomas et al. 1990). The ISC strategy established anetwork of habitat conservation areas (HCAs) encompassing about 5 millionacres of <strong>for</strong>estland managed by <strong>the</strong> Forest Service and <strong>the</strong> BLM. Significantportions of <strong>the</strong> HCAs are not currently old-growth, but under <strong>the</strong> prohibitionon timber harvest in HCAs, <strong>the</strong>se portions would become owl habitat in futuredecades. Significant amounts of old-growth <strong>for</strong>ests were not included in <strong>the</strong>HCAs, but were to be partly protected under a rule requiring 50 percent ofeach quarter-township of federal <strong>for</strong>est outside <strong>the</strong> HCAs to be left with treesaveraging at least 11 inches in diameter and providing 40 percent canopyclosure (<strong>the</strong> 50-11-40 rule).The estimated annual timber harvest on federal lands in <strong>the</strong> Pacific Northwestduring <strong>the</strong> 1991-2000 period would be reduced by 1.6 billion board feet.Oregon and Washington federal lands would experience an estimated reductionof 1.4 billion board feet per year.The Beuter study estimates that <strong>the</strong> implementation of <strong>the</strong> ISC strategy onpublic land would cause direct job losses of 17,133 and total job losses of544

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!