10.07.2015 Views

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

e used to maintain a structure like that used by owls. However, if prescribedfire is used to reduce fuel accumulation and risk of an intense wildfire, <strong>the</strong>n itlikely will be difficult to maintain a suitable structure in all parts of a stand <strong>for</strong>long periods of time.* The stand was multistoried, but probably had many more small trees 1 to10 inches in diameter than would be present without fire prevention.* Two systems were used: 1) group selection to make small openings up toabout 1 acre, plus thinning among groups, and 2) small (1 to 2 acres)irregular shelterwood units to obtain regeneration and to keep large treesin <strong>the</strong> stand.* Regeneration and thinning were done every 20 years.* Prescribed underburning was used about every 40 years to reduce fuelloads and to make <strong>the</strong> stand less susceptible to a severe wildfire.Underburning was estimated to cause a reduction in numbers of trees in<strong>the</strong> understory, but it would aid establishment of new seedlings.* The unmanaged stand lost its layered structure. Since <strong>the</strong>re was nodisturbance to <strong>the</strong> overstory, large trees were projected to increase <strong>the</strong>irdensity (basal area) to well over 300 square feet per acre (Figures G. 15 andG. 16), and to <strong>for</strong>m a dense canopy which would inhibit growth of trees intosize classes greater than 41 inches in diameter.This example shows that uneven-age management can be used to maintainmultilayered stands. Without disturbance to <strong>the</strong> overstory, <strong>the</strong> understorylayers would be reduced greatly over time. In <strong>the</strong>se <strong>for</strong>ests with a low intensityhigh frequency natural fire regime, prescribed burning is desirable to reducefuels and <strong>the</strong> chances of an intense fire which would kill all <strong>the</strong> trees. However,if fire is used, understory density is likely to be decreased <strong>for</strong> a number ofyears. These multistoried stands probably were not common prior to firesuppression and logging. Controlling stand density and obtaining regeneration,as well as fire control, will be needed to maintain <strong>the</strong>se structures. If prescribedfire is used to reduce fuels and likelihood of an intense wildfire, it may not bepossible to maintain an ideal structure <strong>for</strong> owls in all parts of a stand overtime. Use of prescribed fire should be implemented on a landscape basis withburning varied over space and time.F. Multilayer and Mixed Species, East Side CascadesTypical east side Cascade multilayered, mixed species stands of ponderosapine, larch, lodgepole pine, Douglas-fir, and grand fir are projected: a) with notreatment of a stand originated by wildfire about 80 to 100 years ago, b) withheavy thinning applied to a stand which resulted from partial cutting during<strong>the</strong> past 80 to 90 years, and c) with light thinning applied to high densitystands which resulted following fire suppression but no partial cutting. Undernatural fire regimes, <strong>the</strong>se stands would tend to be more open and probably tobe less suitable habitat<strong>for</strong> owls (Oliver et al. 1991).* With no activity, a stand <strong>for</strong>med a very dense layer of grand fir and Douglas-firbeneath a sparse canopy of ponderosa pine (Figure G. 17, stand A).* Thinning (Figure G. 17, stands B and C) followed by natural regenerationchanged <strong>the</strong> understory to primarily grand fir and decreased ponderosapine in <strong>the</strong> overstory. This trend probably could be reversed with heavythinning and/or planting of pine. Trees with mistletoe brooms can be left<strong>for</strong> owl nest sites.* Risk of severe fire was high in all three systems due to slash followingtreatment or self-thinning due to crowding. Fuel management and firesuppression likely will be needed to maintain <strong>the</strong>se structures (Appendix F).* Pathogens and insects killed trees of all species, added to fuel loading, anddecreased <strong>the</strong> density of <strong>the</strong> overstory. Thinning and salvage under a lowdensity scenario would help reduce effects of pathogens and insects.513

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!