Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

10.07.2015 Views

Stand A. No activities (west side open area)150 *500/ 500/5-9 /8-11 294/12-17100ILL5001990 2010 2030 2050Stand B. Low density (west side open area)150 500/ 100/7-11 70/15-21 70/23-31100501990 2010 2030 2050Stand A = No treatmentStand B = Thinning 1992 and 2030*Trees per acre/average diameter (inches) - diameter of largest 5 percentBlack crown = Douglas-fir or western hemlock H AWhite crown = other conifer species Hardwoods AlA shrubsFigure G. 10. A plantation of Douglas-fhr and western hemlock simulated with no thinning and with thinning of small trees at ages20 and 40 years. Numbers of trees per acre, average diameter, and diameter of the lurgest 5 percent of the trees are shown at eachyear. Note the increased crown and understory development as overstory tree density decreases (Oliver et aL 1991).506

Table G.1. Costs per acre or return per acre over 60 years for each silviculturalsystem on each stand (Oliver et al. 1991). Costs assume no timber removal isdone and no risk reduction measures are taken. Returns assume all timber killedis removed (none is left to create snags and logs). Part of the cost of creatingspotted owl habitat, as well as reducing the risk of fires and insects, may be defrayedby selling some of killed trees in each stand. Where some trees are left andothers removed, costs (or returns) would be between values shown here.CostNo Removal(in dollars)ReturnsFull Removal(in dollars)West side 30-year-old standsNo activities system: 0 0Low density system: 340 7,165High density system: 337 7,900West side 70-year-old standsNo activities system: 0 0Multiple canopy strata system: 1,390 14,042Moderate density system: 771 4,866West side open areasNo activities system: 0 0Maintain opening system 310 0Low density system: 422 1,000East side multiple canopy strata standsNo activities system: 0 0Low density system: 1,030 2,129High density system: 742 1,215East side pole standsNo activities system: 0 0Multiple canopy strata system: 2,822 1,777High density system: 1,515 1,862East side open areasNo activities system: 0 0Maintain opening system: 350 0Low density system: 150 0 - - --- -- - .-...1I507

Table G.1. Costs per acre or return per acre over 60 years <strong>for</strong> each silviculturalsystem on each stand (Oliver et al. 1991). Costs assume no timber removal isdone and no risk reduction measures are taken. Returns assume all timber killedis removed (none is left to create snags and logs). Part of <strong>the</strong> cost of creatingspotted owl habitat, as well as reducing <strong>the</strong> risk of fires and insects, may be defrayedby selling some of killed trees in each stand. Where some trees are left ando<strong>the</strong>rs removed, costs (or returns) would be between values shown here.CostNo Removal(in dollars)ReturnsFull Removal(in dollars)West side 30-year-old standsNo activities system: 0 0Low density system: 340 7,165High density system: 337 7,900West side 70-year-old standsNo activities system: 0 0Multiple canopy strata system: 1,390 14,042Moderate density system: 771 4,866West side open areasNo activities system: 0 0Maintain opening system 310 0Low density system: 422 1,000East side multiple canopy strata standsNo activities system: 0 0Low density system: 1,030 2,129High density system: 742 1,215East side pole standsNo activities system: 0 0Multiple canopy strata system: 2,822 1,777High density system: 1,515 1,862East side open areasNo activities system: 0 0Maintain opening system: 350 0Low density system: 150 0 - - --- -- - .-...1I507

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!