Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
few meters from water after heavy rains, but this is unusual (Nussbaum et al.1983). Corn and Bury (1989) compared four species of aquatic amphibians in23 streams in uncut forests versus those in forests logged 14 to 40 years ago,in the central part of the Oregon Coast Range. The density and biomass of thefour species (including Rhyacotriton spp.) was significantly higher (2-7X) in thestreams of uncut forests, because streams in logged stands generally possessedsmaller substrate material, caused by increased sedimentation. WhereRhyacotrton spp. occur in and adjacent to small headwater streams, theirexistence is threatened by timber harvest (Bury and Corn 1988b).Rhyacotriton spp. are fairly widespread in the Pacific Northwest and are mostlikely to occur in or adjacent to higher order, cold streams in forested areas.Because of the requirement for permanently cold water in smaller streams,Olympic salamanders are highly susceptible to forest practices that removecanopy cover and elevate water temperatures (Beatty et al. 1991).Tailed Frog (Ascaphus tie)Distribution and habitat.-Tailed frogs are found west of the crest of theCascade Range from British Columbia to northwestern California. They arealso found in extreme northwestern Oregon, southwestern Washington,northern Idaho, and northwestern Montana. Tailed frogs may be found fromsea level to over 2,000 meters. They are usually found near or in fast-flowing,permanent streams in forests. The tadpoles of the tailed frog are uniqueamong northwestern larvae because their oral disc is modified into a suckingorgan that enables them to cling to rocks in swift current. In the Oregon CoastRange, Gomez (1992) found tailed frogs to be most abundant in riparian areasof mature- and old-growth forests as compared to upland sites and young anddeciduous forests.Ecology and management.-Adults eat a wide variety of invertebrates includingsnails, ticks, spiders, mites, and numerous insect species (Nussbaum et al.1983). Pacific giant salamanders (Dicamptodon) are a major predator of A. trueitadpoles (Metter 1963, Duellman and Trueb 1986). Populations of A. tnuei maybe decimated by natural disasters such as floods that greatly reduce larvalpopulations (Metter 1968).Ascaphus truei is probably the amphibian most likely to be affected by oldgrowthhabitat loss and habitat destruction. Tailed frogs are closely associatedwith fast-flowing streams in forested areas and are commonly found within oldgrowthforests (Bury 1983, Bury and Corn 1988a and 1988b, Raphael 1988,Welsh and Lind 1988, Corn and Bury 1989). Bury (1983) found A. truei onundisturbed old-growth sites but none in logged areas. Bury and Corn (1988)bconsidered A. tnrei to be 'sensitive to timber harvest" and that the survival ofthis species may depend upon protection of cool flowing streams that thespecies requires for breeding purposes and larval development. In loggedstands, tailed frogs are most often found in streams where uncut timber stillremains upstream (Corn and Bury 1989). Tailed frogs are likely to be affectedby increased water temperature that occurs after clear-cutting (Bury and Corn1988b).Because of the extreme philopatry and tendency for A. truei populations to beextremely disjunct (Daugherty and Sheldon 1982), recolonization after localextinction may take a relatively long time. Therefore, some populations maynot recover from habitat destruction.396
Summary and ConclusionsAs a result of the Secretary of Interior's directive, the Recovery Team consideredthe needs of other species associated with older forest ecosystems andassessed the benefits to others species from various recovery options. TheOther Species and Ecocystems Committee emphasized species that were listedfederally as threatened or endangered, candidates for federal listing, statesensitive or species of special concern, and those associated with older forests.We assembled a list of 364 species of plants and animals that meet the abovecriteria and occur within the range of the northern spotted owl. We alsoprovided descriptions of older forest and riparian ecosystems, unique foodwebs of older forests, the use of the spotted owl as an indicator species, andthe biology of spotted owl prey. In this section, we present an overview of thecommittee's work and accomplishments and how we were able to benefit otherspecies with the owl recovery plan: this section summarizes information inChapter V as well as this appendix.The list of 364 species is comprised of 23 species of birds, 18 mammals, 26amphibians and reptiles, 28 fish, 58 molluscs, 59 arthropods, 144 vascularplants, and 8 fungi and lichens. Five species are listed federally as threatenedor endangered (bald eagle, grizzly bear, gray wolf, Sacramento River winterchinook salmon, McDonald's rock cress), and the marbled murrelet andgoshawk have been proposed and petitioned for listing, respectively. A total of155 species was candidates for federal listing, and more than 100 species werelisted as threatened or endangered by one or more of the three states or weredesignated as sensitive or species of special concern. More than 100 speciesare narrowly or broadly endemic to the Pacific Northwest and 194 are associatedwith older forests. The large number of species on the list emphasizes therelevance of considering other species in the owl recovery plan.The committee's work has substantiated the role of riparian ecosystems inconiferous forests of the Pacific Northwest. Of the 364 species that meet ourcriteria, approximately one third (132) are associated with riparian areasincluding 28 species of fish, 45 molluscs, 34 arthropods, 12 amphibians, sixvascular plants, four mammals, and three birds. The 28 species of fish includeapproximately 800 stocks that are considered at risk and may become candidatesfor listing in the future. The numerous riparian associated species plusthe number of fish stocks that are considered at risk stresses the importanceof riparian areas within the range of the northern owl. As a result, we haveprovided a brief synopsis of on the ecology and management of riparian ecosystems.In addition to assembling a list of species for consideration in the owl recoveryplan, the committee developed a short list of priority species. The short list ofpriority species was given the most emphasis in the recovery plan and includes18 species (bald eagle, marbled murrelet, goshawk, marten, fisher, gray wolf,grizzly bear, Oregon slender salamander, Siskiyou Mountain salamander,Larch Mountain salamander, Del Norte salamander, Olympic salamandersfourspecies, Pacific giant salamander, Cope's giant salamander, and tailedfrog); a large group of riparian associated species; and a small group of speciesthat are preyed upon by the owl (northern flying squirrel, dusky-footedwoodrat, bushy-tailed woodrat, deer mouse, western red-backed vole, and redtree vole). Of these species, the marbled murrelet and the numerous fishstocks that are considered at risk were assigned the highest priority. Wecompiled information on the distribution, biology, and habitat relationships ofthe priority species and on the ecology of riparian ecosystems. This informationwas used to influence the design and management of DCAs.397
- Page 362 and 363: KTable D.3. A list of threatened an
- Page 364 and 365: Fishestheir dispersal capabilities
- Page 366 and 367: OlympicNorthcoastalRockyMountainSou
- Page 368 and 369: continued-StatusabState Considered
- Page 370 and 371: continued-SpeciesColumbia sidebandM
- Page 372 and 373: endemic to the Pacific Northwest).
- Page 374 and 375: ------continued-SpeciesRhyacophila
- Page 376 and 377: continued-SpeciesFed3tatusa bStateW
- Page 378 and 379: StatusasbOld ForestState Associatio
- Page 380 and 381: Summaryspores (Maser et al. 1978b).
- Page 382 and 383: Biology of Owl Prey, Older Forest A
- Page 384 and 385: Woodrats.-The dusky-footed woodrat
- Page 386 and 387: and are less restrictive under stat
- Page 388 and 389: Stock concept.-The term "stock" was
- Page 390 and 391: Table D.10. List of fish stocks of
- Page 392 and 393: continued-Steelhead-owipu Sea-runTr
- Page 394 and 395: continued-BasinHoodWillametteRogueS
- Page 396 and 397: Table D.13. Washington streams (or
- Page 398 and 399: inland distribution currently decre
- Page 400 and 401: nesting territories in the three st
- Page 402 and 403: However, little is known about the
- Page 404 and 405: Fisher (Martes penncmti)Distributio
- Page 406 and 407: at one time supported marten popula
- Page 408 and 409: each population of these animals is
- Page 410 and 411: species also is found under the bar
- Page 414 and 415: In considering the needs of other s
- Page 416 and 417: Barrows, C. W. 1981. Roost selectio
- Page 418 and 419: Clark, T. W., E. Anderson, C. Dougl
- Page 420 and 421: Hamer, T. E. 1991. Habitat relation
- Page 422 and 423: Mannan, R. W., E. C. Meslow, and H.
- Page 424 and 425: Oakley, A. L., Collins, J. A., Ever
- Page 426 and 427: Solis, D. M. 1983. Summer habitat e
- Page 428 and 429: Washington Natural Heritage Program
- Page 430 and 431: 414
- Page 432 and 433: f. Wilderness.g. Livestock grazing.
- Page 434 and 435: I. Monitoring.1. Northern spotted o
- Page 436 and 437: 420
- Page 438 and 439: here will reduce some of that habit
- Page 440 and 441: 424
- Page 442 and 443: 426
- Page 444 and 445: Selection of Forest TypesAt the tim
- Page 446 and 447: eceive as little as 25 inches. Disc
- Page 448 and 449: A. FireThe combination and interact
- Page 450 and 451: Table F.4. Important forest insects
- Page 452 and 453: continued-Common Name Causal Agent
- Page 454 and 455: D. DiseasesForest diseases in the P
- Page 456 and 457: continued-Common Name Causal Agent
- Page 458 and 459: continued-Common Name Causal Agent
- Page 460 and 461: III. Forest Protection in theWest C
few meters from water after heavy rains, but this is unusual (Nussbaum et al.1983). Corn and Bury (1989) compared four species of aquatic amphibians in23 streams in uncut <strong>for</strong>ests versus those in <strong>for</strong>ests logged 14 to 40 years ago,in <strong>the</strong> central part of <strong>the</strong> Oregon Coast Range. The density and biomass of <strong>the</strong>four species (including Rhyacotriton spp.) was significantly higher (2-7X) in <strong>the</strong>streams of uncut <strong>for</strong>ests, because streams in logged stands generally possessedsmaller substrate material, caused by increased sedimentation. WhereRhyacotrton spp. occur in and adjacent to small headwater streams, <strong>the</strong>irexistence is threatened by timber harvest (Bury and Corn 1988b).Rhyacotriton spp. are fairly widespread in <strong>the</strong> Pacific Northwest and are mostlikely to occur in or adjacent to higher order, cold streams in <strong>for</strong>ested areas.Because of <strong>the</strong> requirement <strong>for</strong> permanently cold water in smaller streams,Olympic salamanders are highly susceptible to <strong>for</strong>est practices that removecanopy cover and elevate water temperatures (Beatty et al. 1991).Tailed Frog (Ascaphus tie)Distribution and habitat.-Tailed frogs are found west of <strong>the</strong> crest of <strong>the</strong>Cascade Range from British Columbia to northwestern Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. They arealso found in extreme northwestern Oregon, southwestern Washington,nor<strong>the</strong>rn Idaho, and northwestern Montana. Tailed frogs may be found fromsea level to over 2,000 meters. They are usually found near or in fast-flowing,permanent streams in <strong>for</strong>ests. The tadpoles of <strong>the</strong> tailed frog are uniqueamong northwestern larvae because <strong>the</strong>ir oral disc is modified into a suckingorgan that enables <strong>the</strong>m to cling to rocks in swift current. In <strong>the</strong> Oregon CoastRange, Gomez (1992) found tailed frogs to be most abundant in riparian areasof mature- and old-growth <strong>for</strong>ests as compared to upland sites and young anddeciduous <strong>for</strong>ests.Ecology and management.-Adults eat a wide variety of invertebrates includingsnails, ticks, spiders, mites, and numerous insect species (Nussbaum et al.1983). Pacific giant salamanders (Dicamptodon) are a major predator of A. trueitadpoles (Metter 1963, Duellman and Trueb 1986). Populations of A. tnuei maybe decimated by natural disasters such as floods that greatly reduce larvalpopulations (Metter 1968).Ascaphus truei is probably <strong>the</strong> amphibian most likely to be affected by oldgrowthhabitat loss and habitat destruction. Tailed frogs are closely associatedwith fast-flowing streams in <strong>for</strong>ested areas and are commonly found within oldgrowth<strong>for</strong>ests (Bury 1983, Bury and Corn 1988a and 1988b, Raphael 1988,Welsh and Lind 1988, Corn and Bury 1989). Bury (1983) found A. truei onundisturbed old-growth sites but none in logged areas. Bury and Corn (1988)bconsidered A. tnrei to be 'sensitive to timber harvest" and that <strong>the</strong> survival ofthis species may depend upon protection of cool flowing streams that <strong>the</strong>species requires <strong>for</strong> breeding purposes and larval development. In loggedstands, tailed frogs are most often found in streams where uncut timber stillremains upstream (Corn and Bury 1989). Tailed frogs are likely to be affectedby increased water temperature that occurs after clear-cutting (Bury and Corn1988b).Because of <strong>the</strong> extreme philopatry and tendency <strong>for</strong> A. truei populations to beextremely disjunct (Daugherty and Sheldon 1982), recolonization after localextinction may take a relatively long time. There<strong>for</strong>e, some populations maynot recover from habitat destruction.396