Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
species also is found under the bark of decaying Douglas-fir logs or deep withinsuch logs (Nussbaum et al. 1983, R. Storm, pers. obser.). It also frequentsmoist woods of Douglas-fir, maple, hemlock, and red cedar (Stebbins 1985). Inlate spring and summer, it retreats to underground refugia (Nussbaum et al.1983).Bury and Corn (1988) found B. wrighti in damp to wet old-growth, in matureforest, and in clear-cuts. Within these areas, they found 62.3 percent insidelogs and 87 percent in or near logs. They state, 'The Oregon slendersalamander seems to be associated with coarse woody debris in older decayclasses, which is a characteristic feature of old-growth forests." Herrington(1988) observed B. wrighti in talus habitats more often than in other areas.This species was included in a list of species that he believed were capable ofcarrying out their entire life cycle within talus habitats.Ecology and Management.-Substrate temperatures where salamanders werefound in May varied from 10.80 to 13.80 C (Nussbaum et al. 1983). Stebbins(1951) gives good details of his collection sites, indicating microhabitat preferences.Individuals of this species often are found clumped, with two or morebeing together under the same object. When disturbed, they usually coil theirbodies like a watchspring and if further disturbed, flip about violently bycoiling and uncoiling their bodies. If seized by the tail, B. wrighti can shed it atany segment. Near Hidden Lake, Lane County, Oregon, 13 percent of theadults lacked tails or were regenerating them (Nussbaum et al. 1983, Stebbins1951).The Oregon slender salamander is endemic to the forested west slopes of theOregon Cascades north of southern Lane County, Oregon. Studies haveshown it to prefer older forests and to use, with frequency, large decaying logstypical of such forests. Further studies of precise ecological requirements areneeded, but it seems obvious that harvesting of older forests has a high likelihoodof affecting populations of this species (Beatty et al. 1991). Therefore,older forest preserves would benefit this species.Giant Salamanders (Dicamptodon spp.)Since all Dicamptodon share similar habitat requirements and reproductivebiology, they will be discussed as a single entity, except where appropriate.These animals are probably the largest terrestrial caudate amphibians.Detailed historical descriptions of the genus and D. ensatus are provided byAnderson (1969) and Nussbaum (1976). Nussbaum (1970) described the firstcryptic species (D. copeO within the genus, and Good (1989) detailed thebiochemical evidence he used to describe additional enigmatic taxa within D.ensatus. Electrophoretic studies (Daugherty et al. 1983, Good 1989) indicatethat there may be biologically significant levels of genetic discontinuity betweengroups of populations throughout the range. Moreover, the observed heterogeneityamong the groups is consistent with that which is used to differentiatespecies. Thus, these scientists have elected to split D. ensatus into a group ofthree cryptic species, two of which are within the range of the northern spottedowl (D. copei and D. tenebrosus). This adds new responsibilities to the constructionof any management plan for this array of salamanders.Distribution and habitat.-Disjunct populations inhabiting the Rocky Mountainsof Idaho and Montana (see range map) have been designated D. aterrtmusby Good (1989) and Daugherty et al. (1983). Populations of concern to thisreport are found in northwestern California, Oregon, Washington, and extreme394
southwestern British Columbia. Good's (1989) D. ensatus is found in the SanFrancisco Bay area, his D. tenebrosus from lower Sonoma County, California,through southwestern British Columbia, and Nussbaum's (1970) D. copei inthe Columbia River Gorge (both Oregon and Washington sides), the OlympicPeninsula, the Willapa Hills, and the southeastern Washington Cascades(Figure D.5).Adults are common in many areas, but they are nocturnal and secretive. Theycan be found in moist coniferous forests under bark, logs, rocks, and wanderingabout on the forest floor (Beatty et al. 1991). During the breeding seasonthey can be found in or near streams and are also resident in talus slopesassociated with road cuts throughout most of their range (Nussbaum et al.1983, Stebbins 1985, Beatty et al. 1991 pers. obser.). Gomez (1992) foundPacific giant salamanders to be most abundant in riparian areas of mature andold-growth forests as compared to upland sites and young and deciduousforests.Ecology and management.-Larval giant salamanders feed upon a widevariety of aquatic invertebrates and vertebrates (fish, tadpoles, and conspecifics).Predators on larval forms include fishes, weasels, water shrews, and othergiant salamanders. Metamorphic individuals have a reputation for beingvoracious predators. Stomach analyses have showed that they eat terrestrialinvertebrates as well as many kinds of vertebrates (snakes, shrews, and birds)(Metter 1963, Nussbaum et al. 1983, Stebbins 1985).The effects of logging on stream amphibians has been examined by Corn andBury (1989). They were able to compare densities of salamanders in loggedversus unlogged reaches of streams in areas where stream gradients were highand low. The major effects of logging on habitats of these salamanders seemsmost severe on low gradient reaches of streams that have been disturbed bytimber harvest. Disturbance adjacent to lower gradient areas in the stream oralong the banks of higher gradient riparian areas allows the deposition ofsediment, which fills cracks and crevices in lower reaches, making the habitatunsuitable. A second effect, apparently limited to cut over areas on highergradient streams is the enhancement of population densities owing to theincreased primary and herbivore production which canopy opening allows(Hawkins et al. 1983). This may be a short term improvement as no long termpublished studies dealing with population dynamics exist.Olympic Salamanders (Rhyacotriton spp.)Range and habitat.-This group of species is the sole member of the subfamilyRhyacotritoninae and ranges from the Olympic Peninsula of northwesternWashington southward to Mendocino, California in humid coastal forests,entirely west of the crest of the Cascade Mountains (Anderson 1968; FigureD.4). This group is comprised of four different species which is soon to berevised by Good and his coworkers.These salamanders are found in and near small, rapidly flowing, well-shadedand permanent streams with clear, cold (usually 60 to 100 C) water (Stebbins1951). They are seldom more than 1 meter from free-running water(Nussbaum and Tait 1977). Small cold (80 to 120 C in summer) streams withwater seeping through moss-covered gravel are preferred habitats. Larvaeoccur in small mountain streams, spring heads and seepages from sea level toabout 1,200 meters (Nussbaum et al. 1983).Ecology and management.-Olympic salamanders apparently require fairlylow ambient temperatures. Adults may occasionally be found under objects a395
- Page 360 and 361: ABBFigure D. 1. Distribution of: a)
- Page 362 and 363: KTable D.3. A list of threatened an
- Page 364 and 365: Fishestheir dispersal capabilities
- Page 366 and 367: OlympicNorthcoastalRockyMountainSou
- Page 368 and 369: continued-StatusabState Considered
- Page 370 and 371: continued-SpeciesColumbia sidebandM
- Page 372 and 373: endemic to the Pacific Northwest).
- Page 374 and 375: ------continued-SpeciesRhyacophila
- Page 376 and 377: continued-SpeciesFed3tatusa bStateW
- Page 378 and 379: StatusasbOld ForestState Associatio
- Page 380 and 381: Summaryspores (Maser et al. 1978b).
- Page 382 and 383: Biology of Owl Prey, Older Forest A
- Page 384 and 385: Woodrats.-The dusky-footed woodrat
- Page 386 and 387: and are less restrictive under stat
- Page 388 and 389: Stock concept.-The term "stock" was
- Page 390 and 391: Table D.10. List of fish stocks of
- Page 392 and 393: continued-Steelhead-owipu Sea-runTr
- Page 394 and 395: continued-BasinHoodWillametteRogueS
- Page 396 and 397: Table D.13. Washington streams (or
- Page 398 and 399: inland distribution currently decre
- Page 400 and 401: nesting territories in the three st
- Page 402 and 403: However, little is known about the
- Page 404 and 405: Fisher (Martes penncmti)Distributio
- Page 406 and 407: at one time supported marten popula
- Page 408 and 409: each population of these animals is
- Page 412 and 413: few meters from water after heavy r
- Page 414 and 415: In considering the needs of other s
- Page 416 and 417: Barrows, C. W. 1981. Roost selectio
- Page 418 and 419: Clark, T. W., E. Anderson, C. Dougl
- Page 420 and 421: Hamer, T. E. 1991. Habitat relation
- Page 422 and 423: Mannan, R. W., E. C. Meslow, and H.
- Page 424 and 425: Oakley, A. L., Collins, J. A., Ever
- Page 426 and 427: Solis, D. M. 1983. Summer habitat e
- Page 428 and 429: Washington Natural Heritage Program
- Page 430 and 431: 414
- Page 432 and 433: f. Wilderness.g. Livestock grazing.
- Page 434 and 435: I. Monitoring.1. Northern spotted o
- Page 436 and 437: 420
- Page 438 and 439: here will reduce some of that habit
- Page 440 and 441: 424
- Page 442 and 443: 426
- Page 444 and 445: Selection of Forest TypesAt the tim
- Page 446 and 447: eceive as little as 25 inches. Disc
- Page 448 and 449: A. FireThe combination and interact
- Page 450 and 451: Table F.4. Important forest insects
- Page 452 and 453: continued-Common Name Causal Agent
- Page 454 and 455: D. DiseasesForest diseases in the P
- Page 456 and 457: continued-Common Name Causal Agent
- Page 458 and 459: continued-Common Name Causal Agent
southwestern British Columbia. Good's (1989) D. ensatus is found in <strong>the</strong> SanFrancisco Bay area, his D. tenebrosus from lower Sonoma County, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia,through southwestern British Columbia, and Nussbaum's (1970) D. copei in<strong>the</strong> Columbia River Gorge (both Oregon and Washington sides), <strong>the</strong> OlympicPeninsula, <strong>the</strong> Willapa Hills, and <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern Washington Cascades(Figure D.5).Adults are common in many areas, but <strong>the</strong>y are nocturnal and secretive. Theycan be found in moist coniferous <strong>for</strong>ests under bark, logs, rocks, and wanderingabout on <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>est floor (Beatty et al. 1991). During <strong>the</strong> breeding season<strong>the</strong>y can be found in or near streams and are also resident in talus slopesassociated with road cuts throughout most of <strong>the</strong>ir range (Nussbaum et al.1983, Stebbins 1985, Beatty et al. 1991 pers. obser.). Gomez (1992) foundPacific giant salamanders to be most abundant in riparian areas of mature andold-growth <strong>for</strong>ests as compared to upland sites and young and deciduous<strong>for</strong>ests.Ecology and management.-Larval giant salamanders feed upon a widevariety of aquatic invertebrates and vertebrates (fish, tadpoles, and conspecifics).Predators on larval <strong>for</strong>ms include fishes, weasels, water shrews, and o<strong>the</strong>rgiant salamanders. Metamorphic individuals have a reputation <strong>for</strong> beingvoracious predators. Stomach analyses have showed that <strong>the</strong>y eat terrestrialinvertebrates as well as many kinds of vertebrates (snakes, shrews, and birds)(Metter 1963, Nussbaum et al. 1983, Stebbins 1985).The effects of logging on stream amphibians has been examined by Corn andBury (1989). They were able to compare densities of salamanders in loggedversus unlogged reaches of streams in areas where stream gradients were highand low. The major effects of logging on habitats of <strong>the</strong>se salamanders seemsmost severe on low gradient reaches of streams that have been disturbed bytimber harvest. Disturbance adjacent to lower gradient areas in <strong>the</strong> stream oralong <strong>the</strong> banks of higher gradient riparian areas allows <strong>the</strong> deposition ofsediment, which fills cracks and crevices in lower reaches, making <strong>the</strong> habitatunsuitable. A second effect, apparently limited to cut over areas on highergradient streams is <strong>the</strong> enhancement of population densities owing to <strong>the</strong>increased primary and herbivore production which canopy opening allows(Hawkins et al. 1983). This may be a short term improvement as no long termpublished studies dealing with population dynamics exist.Olympic Salamanders (Rhyacotriton spp.)Range and habitat.-This group of species is <strong>the</strong> sole member of <strong>the</strong> subfamilyRhyacotritoninae and ranges from <strong>the</strong> Olympic Peninsula of northwesternWashington southward to Mendocino, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia in humid coastal <strong>for</strong>ests,entirely west of <strong>the</strong> crest of <strong>the</strong> Cascade Mountains (Anderson 1968; FigureD.4). This group is comprised of four different species which is soon to berevised by Good and his coworkers.These salamanders are found in and near small, rapidly flowing, well-shadedand permanent streams with clear, cold (usually 60 to 100 C) water (Stebbins1951). They are seldom more than 1 meter from free-running water(Nussbaum and Tait 1977). Small cold (80 to 120 C in summer) streams withwater seeping through moss-covered gravel are preferred habitats. Larvaeoccur in small mountain streams, spring heads and seepages from sea level toabout 1,200 meters (Nussbaum et al. 1983).Ecology and management.-Olympic salamanders apparently require fairlylow ambient temperatures. Adults may occasionally be found under objects a395