Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

10.07.2015 Views

species also is found under the bark of decaying Douglas-fir logs or deep withinsuch logs (Nussbaum et al. 1983, R. Storm, pers. obser.). It also frequentsmoist woods of Douglas-fir, maple, hemlock, and red cedar (Stebbins 1985). Inlate spring and summer, it retreats to underground refugia (Nussbaum et al.1983).Bury and Corn (1988) found B. wrighti in damp to wet old-growth, in matureforest, and in clear-cuts. Within these areas, they found 62.3 percent insidelogs and 87 percent in or near logs. They state, 'The Oregon slendersalamander seems to be associated with coarse woody debris in older decayclasses, which is a characteristic feature of old-growth forests." Herrington(1988) observed B. wrighti in talus habitats more often than in other areas.This species was included in a list of species that he believed were capable ofcarrying out their entire life cycle within talus habitats.Ecology and Management.-Substrate temperatures where salamanders werefound in May varied from 10.80 to 13.80 C (Nussbaum et al. 1983). Stebbins(1951) gives good details of his collection sites, indicating microhabitat preferences.Individuals of this species often are found clumped, with two or morebeing together under the same object. When disturbed, they usually coil theirbodies like a watchspring and if further disturbed, flip about violently bycoiling and uncoiling their bodies. If seized by the tail, B. wrighti can shed it atany segment. Near Hidden Lake, Lane County, Oregon, 13 percent of theadults lacked tails or were regenerating them (Nussbaum et al. 1983, Stebbins1951).The Oregon slender salamander is endemic to the forested west slopes of theOregon Cascades north of southern Lane County, Oregon. Studies haveshown it to prefer older forests and to use, with frequency, large decaying logstypical of such forests. Further studies of precise ecological requirements areneeded, but it seems obvious that harvesting of older forests has a high likelihoodof affecting populations of this species (Beatty et al. 1991). Therefore,older forest preserves would benefit this species.Giant Salamanders (Dicamptodon spp.)Since all Dicamptodon share similar habitat requirements and reproductivebiology, they will be discussed as a single entity, except where appropriate.These animals are probably the largest terrestrial caudate amphibians.Detailed historical descriptions of the genus and D. ensatus are provided byAnderson (1969) and Nussbaum (1976). Nussbaum (1970) described the firstcryptic species (D. copeO within the genus, and Good (1989) detailed thebiochemical evidence he used to describe additional enigmatic taxa within D.ensatus. Electrophoretic studies (Daugherty et al. 1983, Good 1989) indicatethat there may be biologically significant levels of genetic discontinuity betweengroups of populations throughout the range. Moreover, the observed heterogeneityamong the groups is consistent with that which is used to differentiatespecies. Thus, these scientists have elected to split D. ensatus into a group ofthree cryptic species, two of which are within the range of the northern spottedowl (D. copei and D. tenebrosus). This adds new responsibilities to the constructionof any management plan for this array of salamanders.Distribution and habitat.-Disjunct populations inhabiting the Rocky Mountainsof Idaho and Montana (see range map) have been designated D. aterrtmusby Good (1989) and Daugherty et al. (1983). Populations of concern to thisreport are found in northwestern California, Oregon, Washington, and extreme394

southwestern British Columbia. Good's (1989) D. ensatus is found in the SanFrancisco Bay area, his D. tenebrosus from lower Sonoma County, California,through southwestern British Columbia, and Nussbaum's (1970) D. copei inthe Columbia River Gorge (both Oregon and Washington sides), the OlympicPeninsula, the Willapa Hills, and the southeastern Washington Cascades(Figure D.5).Adults are common in many areas, but they are nocturnal and secretive. Theycan be found in moist coniferous forests under bark, logs, rocks, and wanderingabout on the forest floor (Beatty et al. 1991). During the breeding seasonthey can be found in or near streams and are also resident in talus slopesassociated with road cuts throughout most of their range (Nussbaum et al.1983, Stebbins 1985, Beatty et al. 1991 pers. obser.). Gomez (1992) foundPacific giant salamanders to be most abundant in riparian areas of mature andold-growth forests as compared to upland sites and young and deciduousforests.Ecology and management.-Larval giant salamanders feed upon a widevariety of aquatic invertebrates and vertebrates (fish, tadpoles, and conspecifics).Predators on larval forms include fishes, weasels, water shrews, and othergiant salamanders. Metamorphic individuals have a reputation for beingvoracious predators. Stomach analyses have showed that they eat terrestrialinvertebrates as well as many kinds of vertebrates (snakes, shrews, and birds)(Metter 1963, Nussbaum et al. 1983, Stebbins 1985).The effects of logging on stream amphibians has been examined by Corn andBury (1989). They were able to compare densities of salamanders in loggedversus unlogged reaches of streams in areas where stream gradients were highand low. The major effects of logging on habitats of these salamanders seemsmost severe on low gradient reaches of streams that have been disturbed bytimber harvest. Disturbance adjacent to lower gradient areas in the stream oralong the banks of higher gradient riparian areas allows the deposition ofsediment, which fills cracks and crevices in lower reaches, making the habitatunsuitable. A second effect, apparently limited to cut over areas on highergradient streams is the enhancement of population densities owing to theincreased primary and herbivore production which canopy opening allows(Hawkins et al. 1983). This may be a short term improvement as no long termpublished studies dealing with population dynamics exist.Olympic Salamanders (Rhyacotriton spp.)Range and habitat.-This group of species is the sole member of the subfamilyRhyacotritoninae and ranges from the Olympic Peninsula of northwesternWashington southward to Mendocino, California in humid coastal forests,entirely west of the crest of the Cascade Mountains (Anderson 1968; FigureD.4). This group is comprised of four different species which is soon to berevised by Good and his coworkers.These salamanders are found in and near small, rapidly flowing, well-shadedand permanent streams with clear, cold (usually 60 to 100 C) water (Stebbins1951). They are seldom more than 1 meter from free-running water(Nussbaum and Tait 1977). Small cold (80 to 120 C in summer) streams withwater seeping through moss-covered gravel are preferred habitats. Larvaeoccur in small mountain streams, spring heads and seepages from sea level toabout 1,200 meters (Nussbaum et al. 1983).Ecology and management.-Olympic salamanders apparently require fairlylow ambient temperatures. Adults may occasionally be found under objects a395

southwestern British Columbia. Good's (1989) D. ensatus is found in <strong>the</strong> SanFrancisco Bay area, his D. tenebrosus from lower Sonoma County, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia,through southwestern British Columbia, and Nussbaum's (1970) D. copei in<strong>the</strong> Columbia River Gorge (both Oregon and Washington sides), <strong>the</strong> OlympicPeninsula, <strong>the</strong> Willapa Hills, and <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern Washington Cascades(Figure D.5).Adults are common in many areas, but <strong>the</strong>y are nocturnal and secretive. Theycan be found in moist coniferous <strong>for</strong>ests under bark, logs, rocks, and wanderingabout on <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>est floor (Beatty et al. 1991). During <strong>the</strong> breeding season<strong>the</strong>y can be found in or near streams and are also resident in talus slopesassociated with road cuts throughout most of <strong>the</strong>ir range (Nussbaum et al.1983, Stebbins 1985, Beatty et al. 1991 pers. obser.). Gomez (1992) foundPacific giant salamanders to be most abundant in riparian areas of mature andold-growth <strong>for</strong>ests as compared to upland sites and young and deciduous<strong>for</strong>ests.Ecology and management.-Larval giant salamanders feed upon a widevariety of aquatic invertebrates and vertebrates (fish, tadpoles, and conspecifics).Predators on larval <strong>for</strong>ms include fishes, weasels, water shrews, and o<strong>the</strong>rgiant salamanders. Metamorphic individuals have a reputation <strong>for</strong> beingvoracious predators. Stomach analyses have showed that <strong>the</strong>y eat terrestrialinvertebrates as well as many kinds of vertebrates (snakes, shrews, and birds)(Metter 1963, Nussbaum et al. 1983, Stebbins 1985).The effects of logging on stream amphibians has been examined by Corn andBury (1989). They were able to compare densities of salamanders in loggedversus unlogged reaches of streams in areas where stream gradients were highand low. The major effects of logging on habitats of <strong>the</strong>se salamanders seemsmost severe on low gradient reaches of streams that have been disturbed bytimber harvest. Disturbance adjacent to lower gradient areas in <strong>the</strong> stream oralong <strong>the</strong> banks of higher gradient riparian areas allows <strong>the</strong> deposition ofsediment, which fills cracks and crevices in lower reaches, making <strong>the</strong> habitatunsuitable. A second effect, apparently limited to cut over areas on highergradient streams is <strong>the</strong> enhancement of population densities owing to <strong>the</strong>increased primary and herbivore production which canopy opening allows(Hawkins et al. 1983). This may be a short term improvement as no long termpublished studies dealing with population dynamics exist.Olympic Salamanders (Rhyacotriton spp.)Range and habitat.-This group of species is <strong>the</strong> sole member of <strong>the</strong> subfamilyRhyacotritoninae and ranges from <strong>the</strong> Olympic Peninsula of northwesternWashington southward to Mendocino, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia in humid coastal <strong>for</strong>ests,entirely west of <strong>the</strong> crest of <strong>the</strong> Cascade Mountains (Anderson 1968; FigureD.4). This group is comprised of four different species which is soon to berevised by Good and his coworkers.These salamanders are found in and near small, rapidly flowing, well-shadedand permanent streams with clear, cold (usually 60 to 100 C) water (Stebbins1951). They are seldom more than 1 meter from free-running water(Nussbaum and Tait 1977). Small cold (80 to 120 C in summer) streams withwater seeping through moss-covered gravel are preferred habitats. Larvaeoccur in small mountain streams, spring heads and seepages from sea level toabout 1,200 meters (Nussbaum et al. 1983).Ecology and management.-Olympic salamanders apparently require fairlylow ambient temperatures. Adults may occasionally be found under objects a395

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!