Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

10.07.2015 Views

Home Range SizeHome range is defined generally as the area used by an animal and to whichthe animal exhibits fidelity. The size of home ranges of spotted owls is a focalpoint of controversy because of their large size (Table 2.1; Thomas et al. 1990).Forsman (1980) was the first to critically estimate spotted owl home range sizeby using radio telemetry, although Marshall (1957) guessed at the nightlyranges of Mexican spotted owls in Arizona and Mexico. Radio telemetry is theonly method through which scientists reasonably can estimate the size ofspotted owl home ranges. There has been some concern expressed about theeffect of radio transmitters on survival and reproduction (Paton et al. 1991).Foster et al. (1992) found no significant differences in survival or body massbetween radio-marked and unmarked spotted owls, although some owls diddie as a result of improper transmitter attachment. But they did record asignificant negative effect on reproductive output of radio-marked owls.Because of Forsman's (1980) initial observations that spotted owl home rangeswere very large (more than 2,000 acres on the average) a great deal of scientificeffort has been devoted to verifying his original observations as well as estimatingthe geographic and inherent variation in spotted owl home ranges(Forsman 1981, Solis 1983, Forsman et al. 1984, Gutierrez et al. 1984, Siscoand Gutierrez 1984, Forsman and Meslow 1985, Allen et al. 1989, Hamer et al.1989, Hays et al. 1989, Carey et al. 1990, Paton et al. 1990, Sisco 1990,Thrailkill and Meslow 1990). In addition, Thomas et al. (1990) summarizedthis information as well as other unpublished estimates of home range size (seeTable 2.1).Interpreting the variation in home range size and habitat use has been asignificant challenge to spotted owl ecologists. Variation (i.e., the distributionof observations of a trait) in observed home range size has formed the basisupon which scientific inference and generalization were based about spottedowl home range requirements. From the studies cited earlier, some generalizationscan be made about home range characteristics. First, all studies of homerange size are consistent with Forsman's (1980) original observations of largespotted owl home ranges (see Table 2.1). Second, there is a large degree ofoverlap in home range areas between members of the same pair (Forsman etal. 1984, Solis and Gutierrez 1990) and lesser overlap among adjacent pairs(Forsman et al. 1984). Third, there is considerable geographic variation inhome range size, with owls occupying Washington's Olympic Peninsula havingthe largest home ranges (Thomas et al. 1990). Fourth, home range size increasesas the amount of old forest within the home range decreases (i.e., lossof habitat from logging; Carey 1985, Forsman et al. 1984, Thrailkill andMeslow 1990). It is unknown if this geographic variation is related to latitude,habitat, individual, temporal, or prey-base variation.The size of an owl's home range probably is dependent on many factors (e.g.,food availability, interspecific competition, amount and arrangement of suitablehabitat). For example, spotted owl home range size may be a reflection of anadaptive response to low prey abundance and variation in abundance anddistribution of prey (Ward 1990). Further, estimates of owl home range sizecan be influenced by the sampling design of the home range study and thehome range estimator used in the analyses (Carey et al. 1989, Call 1989).Although these factors may influence the estimation of owl home range size,predictions of home range sizes of birds of the size and trophic level of spottedowls based on allometric equations are similar to empirical estimates of spottedowl home ranges (Schoener 1969). Predictions of spotted owl home range size,based on allometric analysis of mammals, underestimate direct observations of22

Table 2.1. Median annual home range areas (in acres) of spotted owl pairs in differentstudy areas and physiographic provinces.aState No. RangeLocation of ForestSite Pairs Typeb Median Min Max SourcescCaliforniaKlamath MountainsUkonom 9 MC 3,314 2,056 7,823 1Mad River 12 MC 2,975 1,803 4,685 1Willow Creek 2 MC 1,692 1,258 2,126 2OregonSouth CoastChetco 4 MH 5,614 5,327 6,197 1Klamath MountainsSouth Umpqua 3 MC 1,411 1,035 1,504 3Cow Creek 6 MC 4,106 2,499 7,494 3Coast RangesTyee 5 DF/HEM 3,387 1,880 8,272 3Peterson 4 DF/HEM 6,318 3,483 10,189 3Eugene BLM 4 DF/HEM 6,390 3,715 8,180 4Otherd 4 DF/HEM 4,183 2,849 9,748 5Kellogge 5 MC 4,072 1,618 6,281 3Western Cascades 11 DF/HEM 2,955 1,443 9,758 6,7WashingtonWestern Cascades 11 DF/HEM 6,657 2,969 17,942 8,9,10Olympic Peninsula 10 HEM/DF 14,271 4,497 27,309 9,11(Note -Table follows Thomas et al (1990) with changes based on Forsman and Hays (pers comm.))aPair ranges were calculated by delineating 100 percent MCPs (minimum convex polygons) total = exclusive area of male + exclusive area of female+ the area of overlap shared by the two sexes.bMC = mixed conifer, MH = mixed conifer/evergreen, DF/HEM = Douglas-fir, western hemlock, HEM/DF = mostly western hemlock with Douglas-firintermixed.C 1 = Paton et al. (1990), 2 = Solis (1983), 3 = Carey (pers comm.), 4 = Thrailkill and Meslow (pers. comm.), 5 = Carey et al (1989), 6 = Forsman andMeslow (1985), 7 = Miller (pers comm ), 8 = Allen et al (1989), 9 = Hays et al (1989), 10 = Hamer (pers. comm.), 11 = Forsman (pers. comm)dIncludes four sites in the southern Coast Ranges near RoseburgeThis was a relatively dry area bordering the Umpqua River Valley, characterized by mixed conifer forest more typical of the Oregon Klamath provincethan the Coast Rangesowl home ranges (Harestad and Bunnell 1979, Lindstedt et al. 1986). Thus,because spotted owls do not fit theoretical predictions of their home range sizebased on mammalian allometric analysis, it should not be expected that theycan survive and reproduce in a much restricted home range based on extrapolationfrom studies of mammals (SOW 1991).One important feature of an owl's home range is the amount of suitable habitatwithin the boundaries of the home range. Thomas et al. (1990) summarizedthe amounts of old-growth and mature forest within spotted owl pair homeranges (see Table 2.2). The median amount of these late seral stage forests fora number of studies within the northern spotted owl's range was 615 to 4,579acres. In only three studies were median amounts of these forest less than1,000 acres. In one of these studies (Solis 1983), the sample was small (two23

Home Range SizeHome range is defined generally as <strong>the</strong> area used by an animal and to which<strong>the</strong> animal exhibits fidelity. The size of home ranges of spotted owls is a focalpoint of controversy because of <strong>the</strong>ir large size (Table 2.1; Thomas et al. 1990).Forsman (1980) was <strong>the</strong> first to critically estimate spotted owl home range sizeby using radio telemetry, although Marshall (1957) guessed at <strong>the</strong> nightlyranges of Mexican spotted owls in Arizona and Mexico. Radio telemetry is <strong>the</strong>only method through which scientists reasonably can estimate <strong>the</strong> size ofspotted owl home ranges. There has been some concern expressed about <strong>the</strong>effect of radio transmitters on survival and reproduction (Paton et al. 1991).Foster et al. (1992) found no significant differences in survival or body massbetween radio-marked and unmarked spotted owls, although some owls diddie as a result of improper transmitter attachment. But <strong>the</strong>y did record asignificant negative effect on reproductive output of radio-marked owls.Because of Forsman's (1980) initial observations that spotted owl home rangeswere very large (more than 2,000 acres on <strong>the</strong> average) a great deal of scientificef<strong>for</strong>t has been devoted to verifying his original observations as well as estimating<strong>the</strong> geographic and inherent variation in spotted owl home ranges(Forsman 1981, Solis 1983, Forsman et al. 1984, Gutierrez et al. 1984, Siscoand Gutierrez 1984, Forsman and Meslow 1985, Allen et al. 1989, Hamer et al.1989, Hays et al. 1989, Carey et al. 1990, Paton et al. 1990, Sisco 1990,Thrailkill and Meslow 1990). In addition, Thomas et al. (1990) summarizedthis in<strong>for</strong>mation as well as o<strong>the</strong>r unpublished estimates of home range size (seeTable 2.1).Interpreting <strong>the</strong> variation in home range size and habitat use has been asignificant challenge to spotted owl ecologists. Variation (i.e., <strong>the</strong> distributionof observations of a trait) in observed home range size has <strong>for</strong>med <strong>the</strong> basisupon which scientific inference and generalization were based about spottedowl home range requirements. From <strong>the</strong> studies cited earlier, some generalizationscan be made about home range characteristics. First, all studies of homerange size are consistent with Forsman's (1980) original observations of largespotted owl home ranges (see Table 2.1). Second, <strong>the</strong>re is a large degree ofoverlap in home range areas between members of <strong>the</strong> same pair (Forsman etal. 1984, Solis and Gutierrez 1990) and lesser overlap among adjacent pairs(Forsman et al. 1984). Third, <strong>the</strong>re is considerable geographic variation inhome range size, with owls occupying Washington's Olympic Peninsula having<strong>the</strong> largest home ranges (Thomas et al. 1990). Fourth, home range size increasesas <strong>the</strong> amount of old <strong>for</strong>est within <strong>the</strong> home range decreases (i.e., lossof habitat from logging; Carey 1985, Forsman et al. 1984, Thrailkill andMeslow 1990). It is unknown if this geographic variation is related to latitude,habitat, individual, temporal, or prey-base variation.The size of an owl's home range probably is dependent on many factors (e.g.,food availability, interspecific competition, amount and arrangement of suitablehabitat). For example, spotted owl home range size may be a reflection of anadaptive response to low prey abundance and variation in abundance anddistribution of prey (Ward 1990). Fur<strong>the</strong>r, estimates of owl home range sizecan be influenced by <strong>the</strong> sampling design of <strong>the</strong> home range study and <strong>the</strong>home range estimator used in <strong>the</strong> analyses (Carey et al. 1989, Call 1989).Although <strong>the</strong>se factors may influence <strong>the</strong> estimation of owl home range size,predictions of home range sizes of birds of <strong>the</strong> size and trophic level of spottedowls based on allometric equations are similar to empirical estimates of spottedowl home ranges (Schoener 1969). Predictions of spotted owl home range size,based on allometric analysis of mammals, underestimate direct observations of22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!