Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
Mammalsoldest trees in a stand. Eight of the species on the list belong to a group ofbirds, the cavity-nesters (pileated woodpecker, white-headed woodpecker,black-backed woodpecker, red-breasted sapsucker, chestnut-backed chickadee,winter wren, red-breasted nuthatch, and flammulated owl), that requiresnags for nesting and/or foraging. Optimal habitat for these species is foundin old-growth forests, where the abundance of large snags is greatest (Nelson1989, Mannan et al. 1980). Of the 23 species of birds, only three (marbledmurrelet, bald eagle, goshawk) were chosen as priority species. The committeeconcluded that the remainder of the species would benefit from a recovery planthat includes mature and old-growth forests, and they did not require anyspecial attention.Eighteen species of mammals are included on the list for consideration in therecovery plan (Table D.2). Two species, the gray wolf and grizzly bear, currentlyare listed federally as endangered, and the western big-eared bat is acandidate for state listing in Washington and Oregon. The marten is a managementindicator species for the Forest Service because of its association witholder forests. The red tree voles, white-footed vole, western red-backed vole,and shrew mole are endemic to the Pacific Northwest (Figures D. 1 and D.2).Twelve of the eighteen species are associated with or strongly associated witholder forests in one or more of the three states, and two of these species arebats for which there is very little information. Five species are associated withriparian areas. Six species belong to a group that are prey of the northernspotted owl, including the northern flying squirrel, red tree voles, western redbackedvole, dusky-footed woodrat, and bushy-tailed woodrat (Thomas et al.1990, Figure D.2). As a group, they represent the major prey species of the owlother than the deer mouse and snowshoe hare (Forsman et al. 1984, Thomaset al. 1990). The red tree voles, red-backed vole, and northern flying squirrelare associated with older forests throughout most of their range in this region(Carey 1989), with the exception of the flying squirrel in the Oregon Cascades,where Rosenberg and Anthony (1992) found similar densities in old- andsecond-growth forests. Of the 18 species, nine were chosen as priority speciesthat would be most likely to benefit from measures taken to recover the owl.However, six of these species are prey of the northern spotted owl and werechosen solely for that reason. The only species considered likely to benefitfrom specific measures included in the recovery plan were the marten, fisher,gray wolf, and grizzly bear, and the last two occur only in northern Washington.It was assumed that the remainder of the species would benefit from anyrecovery plan that conserves older forest as suitable habitat for owls.Amphibians and ReptilesTwenty-six species of amphibians and reptiles are included on the list forconsideration in the recovery plan, including eight salamanders, six toads andfrogs, one snake, and one turtle (Table D.3). None of the species is listedfederally as threatened or endangered, but the western spotted frog has beenpetitioned for listing and four species of salamanders in the genus Plethodonare candidates for listing. Twelve of the species are associated with riparianareas directly and 12 with older forests. All but three of the species are designatedas "species of special concern" in one or more of the three states. Mostof the amphibians are endemic to the Pacific Northwest (Beatty et al. 1991),and some of the species (e.g., Oregon slender, Larch Mountain, SiskiyouMountain, and Van Dyke's salamanders) have very restricted distributions(Figures D.3 - D.5). Most of the species have specific habitat requirements;342
Table D.2. A list of threatened and endangered, sensitive, candidate, and old-growthassociated mammals within the range of the northern spotted owl.StatusabOld ForestState Associatlon" Endemicd Priority RiparianSpecies Fed WA OR CA WA OR CA L B species associate References*Marten G S S + + + X X 3Martes americanaFisher C2 S S SC + + + X 5Martes pennantiGray wolf E E X X XCanis lupisGrizzly bear E E X X XUrsus arctosDusky-footed woodrat SC + X X X 4Neotoma fuscipesBushy-tailed woodrat X X XNeotoma cinereaNorthern flying squirrel SC ? + ? X 5Glaucomys sabrinusRed tree vole * X X 2,5Phenacomys longicaudusRed tree vole SC + X X 2,5Phenacomys pomoWhite-footed vole SR SC X X 1Phenacomys albipesWestern red-backed vole + X X 4,5Clethrionomys californicusForest deer mouse + X X 5Peromyscus oreasSilver-haired bat + ? 5Lasionycteris noctivagansWestern big-eared bat C SC SCPlecotus townsendiiLong-legged myotis M * * ? 5Myotis volansShrew mole + + ? X 5Neurotrichus gibbsiiWoverine C2 M T TGulo guloFringed myotis M SV ? ? 5Myotis thysanodesWA = Washington OR = Oregon CA = CaliforniaaFederal status: E = endangered, T = threatened, C = candidate, C2 = category 2 candidate, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service candidates that needadditional intormation to propose as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act, PrT = proposed threatened, Pet = petition pending.bState status: WA C = candidate, M = monitor, X = extirpated, S = sensitive, G = game; OR: S = sensitive, SC = sensitive (critical), SV = sensitive(vulnerable), SR = sensitive (rare), SU = sensitive (undetermined), X = extirpated; CA: S = sensitive, SCT = state candidate for listing as threatened, SC= species of concern, E = endangered.California Department of Fish and Game. 1991a. Oregon DepartmentofFish and Wildlife 1991. Washington Department ofWildlife (1991a and 1991b).C+ = old-growth associated, = close old-growth associated, ? = species not studied or data insufficient (see Ruggiero et al. 1991).dEndemkc: L = local, B = broadly (see Ruggiero et al. (1991) for definition and list of endemic species).eReferences: 1) Gomez 1992. 2) Johnsbn and George 1991. 3) Marshall 1991. 4) Raphael 1985. 5) Ruggiero et al. 1991."I'll, 11 I - - 11 ----- ........ 11 .............. I......................... -- - I-I.- ..................... I--- "I'll I 11 -I -...< 11343
- Page 308 and 309: Kerms (1989) measured habitat struc
- Page 310 and 311: Hamer (pers. comm.) described 11 ne
- Page 312 and 313: Table B.3. Percent hardwoods in the
- Page 314 and 315: Table B.5. Comparison of habitats u
- Page 316 and 317: Table B.8. Tree density (number of
- Page 318 and 319: and numbers of trees, and percent o
- Page 320 and 321: Under this hypothesis, owl fitness
- Page 322 and 323: suitable habitat for that region (m
- Page 324 and 325: ResultsDiscussionspotted owl habita
- Page 326 and 327: __Discussiondata from 41 sites in t
- Page 328 and 329: Recommendations for Future Research
- Page 330 and 331: 314
- Page 332 and 333: Hamer, T. 1988. Home range size of
- Page 334 and 335: 318
- Page 336 and 337: 320
- Page 338 and 339: Parameter Estimatesfor Individual S
- Page 340 and 341: provided in Table C. 5. Study of th
- Page 342 and 343: Table C.6. Summary of statistics re
- Page 344 and 345: 3. ConclusionsThis source of bias i
- Page 346 and 347: 330
- Page 348 and 349: Gray Wolf .........................
- Page 350 and 351: formed during the initial meeting t
- Page 352 and 353: provide habitat for the numerous sp
- Page 354 and 355: The ApproachA committee of the Reco
- Page 356 and 357: The List of Threatened and Endanger
- Page 360 and 361: ABBFigure D. 1. Distribution of: a)
- Page 362 and 363: KTable D.3. A list of threatened an
- Page 364 and 365: Fishestheir dispersal capabilities
- Page 366 and 367: OlympicNorthcoastalRockyMountainSou
- Page 368 and 369: continued-StatusabState Considered
- Page 370 and 371: continued-SpeciesColumbia sidebandM
- Page 372 and 373: endemic to the Pacific Northwest).
- Page 374 and 375: ------continued-SpeciesRhyacophila
- Page 376 and 377: continued-SpeciesFed3tatusa bStateW
- Page 378 and 379: StatusasbOld ForestState Associatio
- Page 380 and 381: Summaryspores (Maser et al. 1978b).
- Page 382 and 383: Biology of Owl Prey, Older Forest A
- Page 384 and 385: Woodrats.-The dusky-footed woodrat
- Page 386 and 387: and are less restrictive under stat
- Page 388 and 389: Stock concept.-The term "stock" was
- Page 390 and 391: Table D.10. List of fish stocks of
- Page 392 and 393: continued-Steelhead-owipu Sea-runTr
- Page 394 and 395: continued-BasinHoodWillametteRogueS
- Page 396 and 397: Table D.13. Washington streams (or
- Page 398 and 399: inland distribution currently decre
- Page 400 and 401: nesting territories in the three st
- Page 402 and 403: However, little is known about the
- Page 404 and 405: Fisher (Martes penncmti)Distributio
- Page 406 and 407: at one time supported marten popula
Mammalsoldest trees in a stand. Eight of <strong>the</strong> species on <strong>the</strong> list belong to a group ofbirds, <strong>the</strong> cavity-nesters (pileated woodpecker, white-headed woodpecker,black-backed woodpecker, red-breasted sapsucker, chestnut-backed chickadee,winter wren, red-breasted nuthatch, and flammulated owl), that requiresnags <strong>for</strong> nesting and/or <strong>for</strong>aging. Optimal habitat <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species is foundin old-growth <strong>for</strong>ests, where <strong>the</strong> abundance of large snags is greatest (Nelson1989, Mannan et al. 1980). Of <strong>the</strong> 23 species of birds, only three (marbledmurrelet, bald eagle, goshawk) were chosen as priority species. The committeeconcluded that <strong>the</strong> remainder of <strong>the</strong> species would benefit from a recovery planthat includes mature and old-growth <strong>for</strong>ests, and <strong>the</strong>y did not require anyspecial attention.Eighteen species of mammals are included on <strong>the</strong> list <strong>for</strong> consideration in <strong>the</strong>recovery plan (Table D.2). Two species, <strong>the</strong> gray wolf and grizzly bear, currentlyare listed federally as endangered, and <strong>the</strong> western big-eared bat is acandidate <strong>for</strong> state listing in Washington and Oregon. The marten is a managementindicator species <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Forest Service because of its association witholder <strong>for</strong>ests. The red tree voles, white-footed vole, western red-backed vole,and shrew mole are endemic to <strong>the</strong> Pacific Northwest (Figures D. 1 and D.2).Twelve of <strong>the</strong> eighteen species are associated with or strongly associated witholder <strong>for</strong>ests in one or more of <strong>the</strong> three states, and two of <strong>the</strong>se species arebats <strong>for</strong> which <strong>the</strong>re is very little in<strong>for</strong>mation. Five species are associated withriparian areas. Six species belong to a group that are prey of <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rnspotted owl, including <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn flying squirrel, red tree voles, western redbackedvole, dusky-footed woodrat, and bushy-tailed woodrat (Thomas et al.1990, Figure D.2). As a group, <strong>the</strong>y represent <strong>the</strong> major prey species of <strong>the</strong> owlo<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> deer mouse and snowshoe hare (Forsman et al. 1984, Thomaset al. 1990). The red tree voles, red-backed vole, and nor<strong>the</strong>rn flying squirrelare associated with older <strong>for</strong>ests throughout most of <strong>the</strong>ir range in this region(Carey 1989), with <strong>the</strong> exception of <strong>the</strong> flying squirrel in <strong>the</strong> Oregon Cascades,where Rosenberg and Anthony (1992) found similar densities in old- andsecond-growth <strong>for</strong>ests. Of <strong>the</strong> 18 species, nine were chosen as priority speciesthat would be most likely to benefit from measures taken to recover <strong>the</strong> owl.However, six of <strong>the</strong>se species are prey of <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn spotted owl and werechosen solely <strong>for</strong> that reason. The only species considered likely to benefitfrom specific measures included in <strong>the</strong> recovery plan were <strong>the</strong> marten, fisher,gray wolf, and grizzly bear, and <strong>the</strong> last two occur only in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Washington.It was assumed that <strong>the</strong> remainder of <strong>the</strong> species would benefit from anyrecovery plan that conserves older <strong>for</strong>est as suitable habitat <strong>for</strong> owls.Amphibians and ReptilesTwenty-six species of amphibians and reptiles are included on <strong>the</strong> list <strong>for</strong>consideration in <strong>the</strong> recovery plan, including eight salamanders, six toads andfrogs, one snake, and one turtle (Table D.3). None of <strong>the</strong> species is listedfederally as threatened or endangered, but <strong>the</strong> western spotted frog has beenpetitioned <strong>for</strong> listing and four species of salamanders in <strong>the</strong> genus Plethodonare candidates <strong>for</strong> listing. Twelve of <strong>the</strong> species are associated with riparianareas directly and 12 with older <strong>for</strong>ests. All but three of <strong>the</strong> species are designatedas "species of special concern" in one or more of <strong>the</strong> three states. Mostof <strong>the</strong> amphibians are endemic to <strong>the</strong> Pacific Northwest (Beatty et al. 1991),and some of <strong>the</strong> species (e.g., Oregon slender, Larch Mountain, SiskiyouMountain, and Van Dyke's salamanders) have very restricted distributions(Figures D.3 - D.5). Most of <strong>the</strong> species have specific habitat requirements;342