10.07.2015 Views

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>for</strong>ests. Alternatively, habitat selection by each sex may be <strong>the</strong> result ofreversed sexual dimorphism, which may have evolved <strong>for</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r reasons besidesfood competition (Muller 1986).Competition <strong>for</strong> resources can occur between different species, this is commonlycalled interspecific competition. The use of any finite resource in onearea by more than one species can result in competition, if <strong>the</strong> depletion of <strong>the</strong>resource by one species negatively affects ano<strong>the</strong>r species. Competition iscommonly invoked as a selective mechanism <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> evolution of niche partitioning(Cody 1974). For example, <strong>the</strong> relative differences in body size ofmembers of <strong>the</strong> Pacific Northwest owl community may be an expression of pastcompetition that led to <strong>the</strong> evolution of differences in body size and <strong>for</strong>agingstrategies that minimize diet or habitat overlap. Alternatively, <strong>the</strong> owl communitystructure simply may be an expression of adaptive radiation (adapting toregional environmental conditions) at some time in <strong>the</strong> past (Wiens 1989).Never<strong>the</strong>less, competition can be a serious problem <strong>for</strong> a species when anexotic (nonnative) animal of similar body size and ecological requirementsinvades its habitat. The recent invasion of <strong>the</strong> barred owl into <strong>the</strong> range of <strong>the</strong>spotted owl (Taylor and Forsman 1976) is an example of potential competitionbetween closely related species. Barred owls are larger and more aggressivethan spotted owls in interspecific territorial interactions. They also feed on abroader range of prey, occupy a wider range of habitats, and have smallerannual home ranges than do spotted owls (Hamer 1988). Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>y areknown to have to have displaced spotted owls from <strong>the</strong>ir territories (Allen pers.comm.). Thus, barred owls are a competitive threat to spotted owls.Hybridization: At least three spotted owl/barred owl hybrids have beenobserved in <strong>the</strong> wild (Forsman pers. comm.). It is common in nature <strong>for</strong> closelyrelated species to hybridize, especially where habitat disruption has occurred(Short 1965, Johnsgard 1970, Mayr and Short 1970, Short 1972). Vincent(1990) expressed concern about <strong>the</strong> recent invasion of barred owls and <strong>the</strong>potential effect of hybridization on <strong>the</strong> integrity of <strong>the</strong> spotted owl as a species.Several biological outcomes are possible given <strong>the</strong> rapid expansion of barredowls into <strong>the</strong> range of <strong>the</strong> spotted owl. First, <strong>the</strong> barred owl could, throughextensive hybridization, genetically "swamp" <strong>the</strong> spotted owl. Second, a"hybrid swarm" could develop in specific areas of contact. Third, selectioncould act against hybrids, thus favoring development of effective isolatingmechanisms. Fourth, low levels of hybridization could occur continuouslywithout loss of <strong>the</strong> identity of ei<strong>the</strong>r species. Fifth, hybridization could be arandom event. In only <strong>the</strong> first case is <strong>the</strong> genetic integrity of <strong>the</strong> spotted owlseriously challenged. However, in declining populations any loss of spotted owlreproductive capacity to hybridization must be considered a real threat, butprimarily because of its effect on <strong>the</strong> short-term demography of <strong>the</strong> species.Predation: Ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>for</strong>m of interspecific interaction is predation (<strong>the</strong> killing ofone organism by ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>for</strong> food). As a medium-sized owl, <strong>the</strong> spotted owlkills and eats smaller owls. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is not surprising that <strong>the</strong> larger greathomed owl (Bubo virginianus) kills and eats spotted owls. This is called a foodchain. Predation by great horned owls on spotted owls is a potential hypo<strong>the</strong>sisto explain spotted owl use of old-growth <strong>for</strong>ests, or to explain spotted owlavoidance of open habitats (Forsman et al. 1984). These two species commonlyshare <strong>the</strong> same habitats, but great horned owls tend to occupy sites thatare more fragmented and open than those used by spotted owls (Johnson pers.comm.), perhaps because <strong>the</strong>ir large size makes <strong>the</strong>m less maneuverable indense <strong>for</strong>est. There is no current test of this hypo<strong>the</strong>sis (i.e., relative predationrates by great homed owls on spotted owls using habitats with differentstructure). However, great homed owls probably prey on spotted owls opportunisticallyra<strong>the</strong>r than seeking spotted owls as prey (Forsman pers. comm.).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!