Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
and the number of invertebrate animals is believed to be large, but cannot beestimated accurately because many of the arthropods (Lattin pers. comm.) andmolluscs (Frest and Johannes 1991) have not been surveyed or describedadequately. The biota of coniferous forests in the Pacific Northwest is extremelyrich in numbers of species and possesses numerous species that occuronly in the region (endemic) and are unique among their taxonomic relatives(see Appendix D).Species considered for incorporation into the recovery plan for the owl include361 species of plants and animals (Table 5. 1). Of those, five are listed federallyas threatened or endangered, 155 are candidates for listing, and approximately100 are species of special concern in one or more of the three states. Approximately100 of the species are narrowly or broadly endemic to the PacificNorthwest, and 194 are associated with older forests. In addition, the 28 fishspecies include approximately 766 stocks that are considered at risk (Nehlsenet al. 199 1), and many of these may become candidates for federal listing in thefuture. The large number of candidates for federal listing, species of specialconcern, endemic species, and older forest associates (Table 5. 1) in the PacificNorthwest emphasizes the importance of considering other species in the owlrecovery plan. The large number of species associated with rivers, creeks,ponds, and marshes and their associated vegetation (riparian areas) plus thenumber of fish stocks at risk, are indicative of the importance of consideringriparian ecosystems. Most riparian ecosystems west of the crest of the CascadeMountains in Oregon, Washington, and in northwest California areassociated with coniferous forests, used by northern spotted owls for nesting orforaging (see Appendix D), and influenced by land use practices. The individualspecies considered by the committee, plus their status and associationwith riparian areas and older forests, are listed in Appendix D, Tables D. 1through D.8.From the large list of species, the committee identified 18 priority species(marbled murrelet, bald eagle, goshawk, marten, fisher, grizzly bear, gray wolf,Oregon slender salamander, Siskiyou Mountain salamander, Larch MountainTable 5.1. Summary of 361 plants and animals considered in the recoveprocess for the northern spotted owl (from Appendix D: Tables D.1-D.83.planningFederally Candidate State Species Endemica Older RiparianListed for Listing Listed of Special Forest AssociateConcernAssociateBirds (23) 1 2 4 8 4 20 3Mammals (18) 2 2 3 9 8 12 4Amphibiansb (23) 0 7 3 16 20 12 12Fish (28) 1 7 3 25 N/A N/A 28Molluscs (58) 0 10 1 29 47 43 45Insects (59) 0 34 0 ? ? 23 34Vascular Plants (146) 1 93 16 42 23 76 6Fungi and Lichens (8) 0 0 ? 2 ? 8 0Total (N=361) 5 155 30 131 102 194 132aLocally or broadly endemic.blncludes two reptiles, the sharptail snake and western pond turtle.N/A = not applicable? = unknown, undetermined/222
salamander, Del Norte salamander, Pacific giant salamander, Cope's giantsalamander, Olympic salamander (four species), tailed frog); a larger list ofriparian-associated species including fishes, amphibians, mammals, insects,and molluscs: and a list of five species preyed upon by the owl (flying squirrel,bushy-tailed woodrat, dusky-footed woodrat, red tree vole, and western redbackedvole). Of these species, the marbled murrelet and the numerous fishstocks were assigned the highest priority because of the proposal to list themarbled murrelet as a threatened species and because the numerous fishstocks are considered' at risk. The threatened or endangered species were notassigned as muchr importance because the committee assumed that theirmanagement is sufficiently addressed in recovery plans for each of the species.Benefits of the Plan to Other SpeciesThis section describes the benefits that other species will derive from therecovery plan for the northern spotted owl. Many of these benefits cannot bequantified adequately until surveys of the DCAs for other species have beenconducted. However, some reasonably accurate statements can made.Designated Conservation Areas (DCAs)The size, spacing, and management of DCAs will provide considerable benefitsfor other species throughout the owl's range, particularly species associatedwith older forests. As a result of DCA placement, benefits to other species willbe attained with little or no additional cost. For example, two category 2 DCAswere established in the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest to include sevenpairs of owls and a wild and scenic river corridor along the South Fork of theStillaguamish River. These DCAs also include marbled murrelet locations andimportant stream sections for native fishes. The additional area was offset byreductions in the size of the habitat conservation areas (HCAs) recommendedby the ISC report (Thomas et al. 1990). In Oregon, a DCA was established inthe Suislaw National Forest (Lincoln County) along the coastal area near Rock,Cummins, and Tenmile Creeks. This DCA includes eight owl pairs and eightsingle owls as well as 60 sites for marbled murrelets and three streams withfish stocks at risk. This addition also was offset by reductions in the size oftwo of the HCAs that were recommended by the ISC report.The benefit of DCAs to priority species can be quantified by totaling the numberof occurrences (occupied nest sites for birds, trap locations or observationsfor mammals) of these species within DCAs for each province (Table 5.2). TheDCA network incorporates a total of 486 known sites of priority species acrossthe range of the owl, including 227 occupied murrelet sites, 122 goshawk nestsites, 60 marten sites, 37 fisher sites, and 40 bald eagle nest sites. The DCAsalso include 2,047 miles of streams with stocks of fish that are considered atrisk. The greatest benefits to fish will be achieved in the Klamath physiographicprovince and the Oregon Coast Range where 696 and 267 miles ofstreams, respectively, were included in DCAs. The greatest benefits to otherspecies will be achieved for marbled murrelets in the Oregon Coast Rangewhere 146 occupied sites are included in DCAs. Forty-seven goshawk sites inthe western Washington Cascades and 32 murrelet sites on the OlympicPeninsula were included in DCAs. These are known sites and probably do notrepresent all sites for these species in DCAs. Inclusion of these sites in DCAs,along with the conservation of older forests for owl habitat, will provide significantbenefits to these species within the range of the spotted owl.Management guidelines for DCAs on federal lands are key elements of therecovery plan (see section III.C.2.). These guidelines focus on the maintenanceof suitable habitat for owls and development of suitable habitat in stands223
- Page 188 and 189: crest of the Cascade Mountains. The
- Page 190 and 191: ITable 3.16. Summary comments on th
- Page 192 and 193: sites on federal lands (figure 3.21
- Page 194 and 195: Owl pairsL I 350- _ _ . ...........
- Page 196 and 197: DCAs, often combined with adjacent
- Page 198 and 199: Owl pairsLiKnown owlsin the provinc
- Page 200 and 201: nesting and roosting habitat until
- Page 202 and 203: Option 3: Management of clusters: g
- Page 204 and 205: Table 3.21. Summary of acreage and
- Page 206 and 207: Owl pairs -Known owlsin the provinc
- Page 208 and 209: and to within 0.5 miles of the acti
- Page 210 and 211: Spotted owls have been found at 86
- Page 212 and 213: ITable 3.24. Summary comments on th
- Page 214 and 215: their distance from other sites. Ar
- Page 216 and 217: * Recommend population and habitat
- Page 218 and 219: away in some or all of the range. D
- Page 220 and 221: 4. What are the population dynamics
- Page 222 and 223: If the monitoring and research prog
- Page 224 and 225: lowlands, eastern Oregon Cascades,
- Page 226 and 227: 210
- Page 228 and 229: Stepdown Outline1. Management Tasks
- Page 230 and 231: Table 4.1 Abbreviated Cost TableThe
- Page 232 and 233: continued-TaskPriorityResp. PartyCo
- Page 234 and 235: 218
- Page 236 and 237: 220
- Page 240 and 241: Table 5.2. Numbers of other species
- Page 242 and 243: Amphibians and Reptiles: Larch Moun
- Page 244 and 245: 228
- Page 246 and 247: 230
- Page 248 and 249: Barrows, C. W. 1980. Feeding ecolog
- Page 250 and 251: Clark, R. J., D. G. Smith, and L. H
- Page 252 and 253: Franklin, A. B., J. A. Blakesley, a
- Page 254 and 255: Harestad, A. S., and F. L. Bunnell.
- Page 256 and 257: Lundquist, R. W. and J. M. Mariani.
- Page 258 and 259: O'Halloran, K. 1989. Spotted owl in
- Page 260 and 261: Solis, D. M. 1980. Habitat use by n
- Page 262 and 263: Young, K. D., A. B. Franklin, and J
- Page 264 and 265: 248
- Page 266 and 267: 250
- Page 268 and 269: Table A.1. General approaches for e
- Page 270 and 271: complete count of the territorial b
- Page 272 and 273: Table A.3. Powera for various desig
- Page 274 and 275: Table A.4. Illustration of a Markov
- Page 276 and 277: Obviously, these statements hold on
- Page 278 and 279: Table A.6. Reliability of trend est
- Page 280 and 281: Demographic AnalysisAs noted earlie
- Page 282 and 283: the estimate (using the simple equa
- Page 284 and 285: however, we know little about the b
- Page 286 and 287: Table A.8. Summary of information n
and <strong>the</strong> number of invertebrate animals is believed to be large, but cannot beestimated accurately because many of <strong>the</strong> arthropods (Lattin pers. comm.) andmolluscs (Frest and Johannes 1991) have not been surveyed or describedadequately. The biota of coniferous <strong>for</strong>ests in <strong>the</strong> Pacific Northwest is extremelyrich in numbers of species and possesses numerous species that occuronly in <strong>the</strong> region (endemic) and are unique among <strong>the</strong>ir taxonomic relatives(see Appendix D).Species considered <strong>for</strong> incorporation into <strong>the</strong> recovery plan <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> owl include361 species of plants and animals (Table 5. 1). Of those, five are listed federallyas threatened or endangered, 155 are candidates <strong>for</strong> listing, and approximately100 are species of special concern in one or more of <strong>the</strong> three states. Approximately100 of <strong>the</strong> species are narrowly or broadly endemic to <strong>the</strong> PacificNorthwest, and 194 are associated with older <strong>for</strong>ests. In addition, <strong>the</strong> 28 fishspecies include approximately 766 stocks that are considered at risk (Nehlsenet al. 199 1), and many of <strong>the</strong>se may become candidates <strong>for</strong> federal listing in <strong>the</strong>future. The large number of candidates <strong>for</strong> federal listing, species of specialconcern, endemic species, and older <strong>for</strong>est associates (Table 5. 1) in <strong>the</strong> PacificNorthwest emphasizes <strong>the</strong> importance of considering o<strong>the</strong>r species in <strong>the</strong> owlrecovery plan. The large number of species associated with rivers, creeks,ponds, and marshes and <strong>the</strong>ir associated vegetation (riparian areas) plus <strong>the</strong>number of fish stocks at risk, are indicative of <strong>the</strong> importance of consideringriparian ecosystems. Most riparian ecosystems west of <strong>the</strong> crest of <strong>the</strong> CascadeMountains in Oregon, Washington, and in northwest Cali<strong>for</strong>nia areassociated with coniferous <strong>for</strong>ests, used by nor<strong>the</strong>rn spotted owls <strong>for</strong> nesting or<strong>for</strong>aging (see Appendix D), and influenced by land use practices. The individualspecies considered by <strong>the</strong> committee, plus <strong>the</strong>ir status and associationwith riparian areas and older <strong>for</strong>ests, are listed in Appendix D, Tables D. 1through D.8.From <strong>the</strong> large list of species, <strong>the</strong> committee identified 18 priority species(marbled murrelet, bald eagle, goshawk, marten, fisher, grizzly bear, gray wolf,Oregon slender salamander, Siskiyou Mountain salamander, Larch MountainTable 5.1. Summary of 361 plants and animals considered in <strong>the</strong> recoveprocess <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn spotted owl (from Appendix D: Tables D.1-D.83.planningFederally Candidate State Species Endemica Older RiparianListed <strong>for</strong> Listing Listed of Special Forest AssociateConcernAssociateBirds (23) 1 2 4 8 4 20 3Mammals (18) 2 2 3 9 8 12 4Amphibiansb (23) 0 7 3 16 20 12 12Fish (28) 1 7 3 25 N/A N/A 28Molluscs (58) 0 10 1 29 47 43 45Insects (59) 0 34 0 ? ? 23 34Vascular <strong>Plan</strong>ts (146) 1 93 16 42 23 76 6Fungi and Lichens (8) 0 0 ? 2 ? 8 0Total (N=361) 5 155 30 131 102 194 132aLocally or broadly endemic.blncludes two reptiles, <strong>the</strong> sharptail snake and western pond turtle.N/A = not applicable? = unknown, undetermined/222