10.07.2015 Views

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

v.The nor<strong>the</strong>rn spotted owl is associated with older coniferous <strong>for</strong>ests in <strong>the</strong>Pacific Northwest (Forsman et al. 1984, Thomas et al. 1990), and optimalhabitat <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> species can be found in <strong>for</strong>ests older than 200 years. Becauseof this association and <strong>the</strong> large home ranges of spotted owls, which vary from1,000 to 10,000 acres from Cali<strong>for</strong>nia to Washington, <strong>the</strong> species often hasbeen used as a symbol of older <strong>for</strong>est ecosystems. In addressing <strong>the</strong> conservationof <strong>the</strong> owl, it became apparent that its range overlaps <strong>the</strong> ranges of manyo<strong>the</strong>r species, some of which are listed or are candidates <strong>for</strong> listing. There<strong>for</strong>e,it is reasonable to consider <strong>the</strong> conservation needs of o<strong>the</strong>r species when thoseneeds can be accomplished at little or no additional cost to owl conservation.The outcome of such an ef<strong>for</strong>t is likely to be a more efficient and effectiveconservation strategy <strong>for</strong> older <strong>for</strong>est ecosystems in <strong>the</strong> region. It is alsoimportant <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> recovery plan to avoid actions <strong>for</strong> owl conservation that mighthave adverse effects on o<strong>the</strong>r species. There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Recovery</strong> Team wascharged with considering o<strong>the</strong>r species and older <strong>for</strong>est ecosystems in developinga recovery plan <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn spotted owl.The request to consider o<strong>the</strong>r species in <strong>the</strong> recovery plan <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> owl camefrom Secretary of <strong>the</strong> Interior Manuel Lujan, who wrote "There are o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>for</strong>estecosystem species that may be candidates <strong>for</strong> listing under <strong>the</strong> EndangeredSpecies Act which may benefit from any recovery plan <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn spottedowl. To <strong>the</strong> extent possible, <strong>the</strong> team should assess <strong>the</strong> relative benefits to<strong>the</strong>se species from <strong>the</strong> implementation of various recovery options." As aresult, <strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r Species and Ecosystems Committee of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Recovery</strong> Teamwas <strong>for</strong>med to address this directive. A principle of <strong>the</strong> committee has beenthat <strong>the</strong> plan should take advantage of opportunities to benefit o<strong>the</strong>r specieswhere possible and not impact <strong>the</strong>m negatively with a recovery strategy <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>owl.This ef<strong>for</strong>t is important because conservation ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>for</strong> each species will be toocostly and time consuming, and a species-by-species approach is not likely tocapture all <strong>the</strong> structural parts and functional relationships of older coniferous<strong>for</strong>ests.The List of Species ConsideredThe O<strong>the</strong>r Species and Ecosystems Committee considered all plants andanimals that are associated with coniferous <strong>for</strong>ests within <strong>the</strong> range of <strong>the</strong>nor<strong>the</strong>rn spotted owl. However, <strong>the</strong> committee emphasized threatened orendangered species, candidates <strong>for</strong> federal listing, state sensitive species, andspecies associated with older <strong>for</strong>ests. The committee developed a list of speciesby conducting a series of meetings; visiting with numerous scientists: acquiringlists of federal threatened and endangered species, state sensitive species,and old-growth associated species (Ruggiero et al. 1991); and reviewing reportsand published literature. The O<strong>the</strong>r Species and Ecosystems Committeesponsored a 2-day workshop to discuss <strong>the</strong> ecology and management needs ofpriority species. The administrative record <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Recovery</strong> Team provides adetailed description of <strong>the</strong>se activities (see Tables D. 1 through D.3 of <strong>the</strong>record): and Appendix D provides a more detailed description of <strong>the</strong> approach,<strong>the</strong> list of species, and <strong>the</strong> ecology of riparian ecosystems and priority species.Brown (1985:37) listed 460 species of birds, mammals, and amphibians thatinhabit plant communities west of <strong>the</strong> crest of <strong>the</strong> Cascade Mountains inOregon and Washington. A large number of plant species occur in this region,221

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!