Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

10.07.2015 Views

4. What are the population dynamics patterns of principal prey species, andhow are they influenced by habitat?5. What are movement and dispersal patterns of prey species?6. How do different habitat conditions affect competitive relationships betweenbarred owls and spotted owls?To facilitate the validation monitoring/research needed for adaptive management,the Recovery Team recommends that additional research areas be set-upnear established demographic study areas within the federal matrix. Thedemographic study areas are described later. One research area per provincewould be desirable, and its area should be equivalent to its companion demographicstudy area. The Recovery Team recommends that these research areashave as their goal replicated experiments to evaluate 1) the response of owls totimber harvest, 2) the utility of various silvicultural prescriptions in producinghabitat for owls, 3) emigration and immigration rates in response to a changinglandscape, and 4) the demographic response of the owl population within thearea. Experiments in these research areas can occur in currently suitablehabitat, and will contribute to the objective of the recovery plan to delist theowl across its range and to achieve forest silviculture that is compatible withowls across the landscape. Inferences regarding the compatibility of timberharvest with owls can be achieved only through the execution of controlled,replicated experiments. It is essential that the principle investigators of thecompanion demography and experimental research areas agree to full cooperationbefore establishing the research protocol on the experimental areas.The Recovery Team also recommends that research continue on the YakimaIndian Nation land and on private land throughout the range of the owl.Ongoing research on Yakima land is a unique study of owl population responsesto a forested landscape that has been managed through an unevenagedsilvicultural regime.Adaptive Management ProceduresTo realize the objectives of the monitoring and research program, there mustbe a process in place that will guide how the results of the program will beused. This process must include agreement on specific monitoring and researchresults that will trigger review and possible revision of the recoveryplan. Such reviews could take place as part of a review cycle for the recoveryplan or at any other time. The Recovery Team strongly recommends that suchtrigger points be developed for at least the following potential actions:1. Determine when it would be appropriate to modify DCA boundaries basedon owl numbers or suitable habitat availability that fall below or aboveprojections.If numbers of owls or amounts of suitable habitat are found to be abovepredicted levels in one or more DCAs, it may be appropriate to either reducethe size of those DCAs or to allow greater flexibility of management within them(see the next potential action). However, it first should be determined that thehigh populations are not the result of "packing" phenomena Thomas et al.1990) and that the proposed management has been demonstrated to producedesired habitat conditions for owls. Review of any individual DCA should bedone within the context of an entire province to ensure that a key source areais not weakened. If one or more DCAs are below objective levels, it may benecessary to modify DCA boundaries and possibly increase their size or thequality of habitat within the DCA boundary. In this case, it first should bedetermined that the low numbers of owls are not related to short-term demographicresponses. Finally, it may be appropriate to eliminate DCA boundaries204

when the population of owls in the matrix is at the level of those found in theDCA, their demographic rates are similar to those in DCAs, and forest managementhas been demonstrated to be compatible with the owls.2. Determine when it would be appropriate to broaden management recommendationswithin DCAs based on 1) achievement of stable, self-sustainingnumbers of owls or amounts of suitable habitat that exceed predictions, 2)demonstrated success of management activities in providing for owls, or 3)demonstrated need to reduce likelihood of large-scale disturbances.The recovery plan recommends that some forms of salvage be allowed withinDCAs and that some limited attempts begin to use management to improvehabitat and to decrease the risk of disturbance. Monitoring both the implementationand effectiveness of these activities is crucial because they willinfluence the capability of the DCAs to support owls. As monitoring adds toknowledge about the use of management practices in DCAs, it may be useful toincrease and broaden application of those practices. If management is demonstratedto be useful in developing younger, currently unsuitable stands, theuse of such management should be encouraged beyond the levels establishedin this plan. If management is shown to be useful in older stands, recommendationsmay be broadened to include those stands. If owl numbers oramounts of suitable habitat exceed predictions, it may be useful to define acore area of the DCA that would continue to be managed under current guidelinesand additional areas that would be managed with fewer restrictions onthe use of silviculture, salvage, and other management options. Finally, if theability to maintain suitable habitat while reducing the risk of large-scaledisturbance is demonstrated, such activities should be encouraged withinDCAs that are at high risk.3. Determine when it would be appropriate to end special management forreserved pair areas based on improved conditions in individual DCAs orgroups of DCAs.The recovery plan recommends that additional pair areas be established wherethe DCA system is currently deficient. If those deficiencies are corrected, itmay be appropriate to modify management within those pair areas.4. Determine when it would be appropriate to supplement or modify the DCAsystem based on unexpectedly poor performance of owl populations (i.e.,survival rates, fecundity rates, and immigration rates).The monitoring and research program will provide data on the populationdynamics of owls within the DCA system. If it becomes clear that populationsare not replacing themselves within these areas, or that immigration is notoccurring as expected among areas, one of the following actions may be appropriate:a. Modify DCAs where possible to include any contiguous areas of highowl concentrations and habitat with low levels of fragmentation.b. Add new DCAs to the system, emphasizing areas of high owl concentrationand high quality habitat.c. Add new DCAs to the system with the primary objective of reducing thedispersal distance among DCAs.d. Modify the recommendations for management within DCAs.5. Determine when it would be appropriate to modify matrix managementrecommendations based on impending isolation of DCA subpopulationsdetermined through unexpectedly low rates of movement among DCAs.205

when <strong>the</strong> population of owls in <strong>the</strong> matrix is at <strong>the</strong> level of those found in <strong>the</strong>DCA, <strong>the</strong>ir demographic rates are similar to those in DCAs, and <strong>for</strong>est managementhas been demonstrated to be compatible with <strong>the</strong> owls.2. Determine when it would be appropriate to broaden management recommendationswithin DCAs based on 1) achievement of stable, self-sustainingnumbers of owls or amounts of suitable habitat that exceed predictions, 2)demonstrated success of management activities in providing <strong>for</strong> owls, or 3)demonstrated need to reduce likelihood of large-scale disturbances.The recovery plan recommends that some <strong>for</strong>ms of salvage be allowed withinDCAs and that some limited attempts begin to use management to improvehabitat and to decrease <strong>the</strong> risk of disturbance. Monitoring both <strong>the</strong> implementationand effectiveness of <strong>the</strong>se activities is crucial because <strong>the</strong>y willinfluence <strong>the</strong> capability of <strong>the</strong> DCAs to support owls. As monitoring adds toknowledge about <strong>the</strong> use of management practices in DCAs, it may be useful toincrease and broaden application of those practices. If management is demonstratedto be useful in developing younger, currently unsuitable stands, <strong>the</strong>use of such management should be encouraged beyond <strong>the</strong> levels establishedin this plan. If management is shown to be useful in older stands, recommendationsmay be broadened to include those stands. If owl numbers oramounts of suitable habitat exceed predictions, it may be useful to define acore area of <strong>the</strong> DCA that would continue to be managed under current guidelinesand additional areas that would be managed with fewer restrictions on<strong>the</strong> use of silviculture, salvage, and o<strong>the</strong>r management options. Finally, if <strong>the</strong>ability to maintain suitable habitat while reducing <strong>the</strong> risk of large-scaledisturbance is demonstrated, such activities should be encouraged withinDCAs that are at high risk.3. Determine when it would be appropriate to end special management <strong>for</strong>reserved pair areas based on improved conditions in individual DCAs orgroups of DCAs.The recovery plan recommends that additional pair areas be established where<strong>the</strong> DCA system is currently deficient. If those deficiencies are corrected, itmay be appropriate to modify management within those pair areas.4. Determine when it would be appropriate to supplement or modify <strong>the</strong> DCAsystem based on unexpectedly poor per<strong>for</strong>mance of owl populations (i.e.,survival rates, fecundity rates, and immigration rates).The monitoring and research program will provide data on <strong>the</strong> populationdynamics of owls within <strong>the</strong> DCA system. If it becomes clear that populationsare not replacing <strong>the</strong>mselves within <strong>the</strong>se areas, or that immigration is notoccurring as expected among areas, one of <strong>the</strong> following actions may be appropriate:a. Modify DCAs where possible to include any contiguous areas of highowl concentrations and habitat with low levels of fragmentation.b. Add new DCAs to <strong>the</strong> system, emphasizing areas of high owl concentrationand high quality habitat.c. Add new DCAs to <strong>the</strong> system with <strong>the</strong> primary objective of reducing <strong>the</strong>dispersal distance among DCAs.d. Modify <strong>the</strong> recommendations <strong>for</strong> management within DCAs.5. Determine when it would be appropriate to modify matrix managementrecommendations based on impending isolation of DCA subpopulationsdetermined through unexpectedly low rates of movement among DCAs.205

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!