Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

10.07.2015 Views

their distance from other sites. Areas within clusters that do not have owlsshould be evaluated for their potential habitat suitability. If these areas cansupport owl habitat, measures (i.e., prescriptions for certain habitat qualityand quantity, time schedule for growth, stand management requirements, andpotential management options) should be drafted to guide creation of owlhabitat. Dispersal habitat should be maintained throughout the province.Management of these clusters will be a mixture of practices because of the mixof ownerships. All sites on state and private lands need to be managed in aconservative manner to provide support for DCAs and individual owl pairsoccurring outside the DCAs. Tools for implementation include regulations thatprovide for the quality and quantity of owl habitat to be maintained.This option provides limited flexibility to private landowners, but it does allowfor some conservative management of existing suitable habitat. Extensive owlsurveys will be necessary. Attempts to combine individual sites to form mutuallysupporting clusters will enhance recovery. This option provides littleincentive for landowners to participate in landscape management or go beyondconformity with existing rules governing take.Coordinatton. Forestland ownership in this province is dominated by nationalforests and large, private, industrial landowners. Only small amounts of otherownerships would be involved in maintaining local owl populations.This option requires strong coordination among federal land managementagencies and private landowners, and the state through its forest practicesregulation mechanism. This process is ongoing and is being strengthened bythe drafting of a habitat conservation plan (HCP) by the state. This planshould assure that both suitable owl habitat and owls occur in the samegeneral area on both sides of the boundary between the two spotted owlsubspecies.198

C,.,5. CoordinationNeedfor CoordinationImplementation of the northern spotted owl recovery plan will require a level ofeffort that is without precedent in other attempts to recover species. Therecovery plan will necessitate actions over several decades at a minimum,including long-term commitments of funding and personnel from a variety ofgovernmental entities and the private sector. Activities will encompass a largeand varied geographic area, and involve intensive monitoring, evaluation,research, and management tasks. Although these activities will be integratedwith ongoing efforts in wildlife management, forestry, and silviculture to asignificant extent, they have distinct objectives that address the recovery plan'sdelisting criteria. Also, the recovery plan will require periodic updating toreflect new scientific knowledge and the results of monitoring and evaluations.Efficient and effective implementation of the recovery plan will require mechanismsto coordinate the wide variety of activities by the participating entities.In the short term, the Recovery Team should be maintained to provide thatcoordination function. Federal agencies (National Park Service, Bureau ofIndian Affairs, Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management, ForestService) and state government agencies need to be involved in the coordinationand implementation of the recovery plan. In particular, the FWS must play amajor role in assuring that the plan is implemented. This will require theFWS's commitment with respect to the consultation process and other areas.In addition, the scope and breadth of coordination clearly will require establishinga group to help facilitate recovery during the lengthy time frame contemplatedin the plan.Coordinating GroupThe Recovery Team recommends a coordinating group be established to guiderecovery activities over the long term. The coordinating group should be basedregionally and explicitly constituted to facilitate interdisciplinary and managerialcommunication among action agencies, states, and the private sector inaddressing the biological, forestry, and policy issues associated with recovery.This can be accomplished by including persons with technical expertise asmembers or, if members are management officials, by assuring the group'saccess to technical personnel. Each participant should determine an appropriatemeans of liaison with the group. For example, agencies could establishtheir own recovery implementation teams or regional advisory bodies.Scope and functions. The coordinating group must be structured and itsfunctions defined to avoid potential conflicts with the statutory mandates ofthe agencies involved. Therefore, the Recovery Team explicitly recommends nodirect regulatory function for the group. This is to avoid creating the potentialfor confusion and duplication of effort of the FWS's section 7 consultationresponsibilities under the Endangered Species Act, as well as the land managementplanning and operational mandates of action agencies. The RecoveryTeam recommends that the group be chartered to address the areas outlinedin this section. These areas encompass broad policy and programmaticconcerns that are critical to progress in the recovery effort and ultimately toachieve delisting.199

<strong>the</strong>ir distance from o<strong>the</strong>r sites. Areas within clusters that do not have owlsshould be evaluated <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir potential habitat suitability. If <strong>the</strong>se areas cansupport owl habitat, measures (i.e., prescriptions <strong>for</strong> certain habitat qualityand quantity, time schedule <strong>for</strong> growth, stand management requirements, andpotential management options) should be drafted to guide creation of owlhabitat. Dispersal habitat should be maintained throughout <strong>the</strong> province.Management of <strong>the</strong>se clusters will be a mixture of practices because of <strong>the</strong> mixof ownerships. All sites on state and private lands need to be managed in aconservative manner to provide support <strong>for</strong> DCAs and individual owl pairsoccurring outside <strong>the</strong> DCAs. Tools <strong>for</strong> implementation include regulations thatprovide <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> quality and quantity of owl habitat to be maintained.This option provides limited flexibility to private landowners, but it does allow<strong>for</strong> some conservative management of existing suitable habitat. Extensive owlsurveys will be necessary. Attempts to combine individual sites to <strong>for</strong>m mutuallysupporting clusters will enhance recovery. This option provides littleincentive <strong>for</strong> landowners to participate in landscape management or go beyondcon<strong>for</strong>mity with existing rules governing take.Coordinatton. Forestland ownership in this province is dominated by national<strong>for</strong>ests and large, private, industrial landowners. Only small amounts of o<strong>the</strong>rownerships would be involved in maintaining local owl populations.This option requires strong coordination among federal land managementagencies and private landowners, and <strong>the</strong> state through its <strong>for</strong>est practicesregulation mechanism. This process is ongoing and is being streng<strong>the</strong>ned by<strong>the</strong> drafting of a habitat conservation plan (HCP) by <strong>the</strong> state. This planshould assure that both suitable owl habitat and owls occur in <strong>the</strong> samegeneral area on both sides of <strong>the</strong> boundary between <strong>the</strong> two spotted owlsubspecies.198

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!