Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
and to within 0.5 miles of the activity center), and rules that would ensure thatthe appropriate quantity and quality of habitat be maintained. Dispersalhabitat also would be designated throughout the province. A 20-pair cluster ineastern Trinity County would be managed with fixed boundaries and locationsof sites.Extensive surveying for owls would be necessary to implement this option andmonitor it over time. Fixed boundaries and site locations increase the certaintyduring the short term that owls will be found, but may raise issues of equitybetween landowners. Unless the area has been extensively surveyed, the useof existing known sites as the basis for restricting management may effectivelypenalize those owners who have conducted surveys and are engaged in activeresearch. This option limits the flexibility of landowners with the responsibilityof providing for owl sites.Option 2: Management of owl sites at the watershed levelThis option would provide a management strategy to maintain dispersalhabitat on private inholdings within federal DCAs in the western zone, butwould create incentives for consolidating the inholdings with DCA management.It would provide nonfederal support for category 2 DCAs and reservedpair areas in the eastern and southern zone, using lands within the generalwatershed areas containing the DCA. Sites would be distributed based onknown owl occurrence. Owl sites within the major watersheds currentlyencompassed by the DCA would be recommended to provide support for theDCA. These sites would be managed to ensure that the appropriate quantityand quality of suitable habitat would be maintained and that the locationwould be maintained (e.g., similar to current state forest practices rulesregarding take, and confine the site activity center to a 3,000-acre area withina specific drainage). Dispersal habitat would be maintained throughout theprovince. A cluster of 10 pairs is an objective for eastern Trinity County.This option provides somewhat more flexibility to private landowners. It is stillbased on managing for individual activity centers, so extensive owl surveyswould be required. The location of sites is more flexible than under option 1,and fewer sites are likely to be required throughout the province. Higher risksmay be associated with maintaining only dispersal habitat on inholdingswithin DCAs in the western zone. Implementing this option, which is based oncurrently known activity centers, may effectively penalize landowners who havesurveyed extensively for owls, unless the area has been extensively surveyed.Option 3: Management of all known owl sitesThis option would maintain dispersal habitat on private inholdings withinDCAs in the western zone, but would create incentives for consolidating theinholdings with DCA management. Nonfederal land would support category 2DCAs and reserved pair areas in the eastern and southern zone, using allknown sites. Habitat requirements for individual activity centers could beidentified and managed by implementing minimum stand structure provisionsfor each habitat type within province. Additionally, guidelines would beprovided at the cluster level to maintain such characteristics as the percentageof suitable habitat in the cluster, the minimum stand size and distribution ofthat suitable habitat, and the presence of high-value habitat at the activitycenter. Dispersal habitat would be designated throughout the province.This option also would include establishing a new cluster on state, private, andBLM lands in northeastern Trinity County. This cluster has the potential for20 activity centers. Habitat would be provided by prescriptive managementrules controlling the quantity and quality of habitat to be maintained. It would192
confine site location to a specific drainage and would be within 0.5 miles of theactivity center.This option would provide the best demographic support for the populations inthese areas where habitat conditions preclude maintaining large enoughclusters to provide a good chance of maintaining a viable population over time.Over time this might result in forming larger clusters than currently possibleand in increasing local population stability.This option would require extensive owl surveys to identify owl sites and tomonitor implementation. The option creates a disincentive to locate owl sitesand an incentive to harvest suitable but unoccupied habitat. Managementstrategies for areas where spatial distribution of known locations do not.match" with needs to support DCAs.Option 4: Landscape-based habitat managementThis option would require maintaining dispersal habitat on inholdings withinDCA boundaries in the western zone, but would provide incentives for maintainingnesting, foraging, and roosting habitat. Category 2 DCAs and reservedpair areas in the eastern and southern zones would be supported by providingsuitable habitat in areas within major watersheds included within DCA boundaries.Specific location of suitable habitat for activity centers would not bespecified, but quantity and quality would be ensured at the watershed level.Suitable habitat to support 10 pairs of owls would be maintained in easternTrinity County, using existing federal lands as the basis. Specific owl sitelocations and cluster boundaries would not be designated.This option provides greater flexibility to the private landowner. It would notrequire owl surveys to the extent of other options. The option provides incentivesfor landowners to participate in landscape level management, and tolocate owls or manage habitat in desirable locations.Coordination. Land ownership is dominated by the national forests. Privatelands in the province are primarily large industrial forest holdings. BLM landsconstitute a small but relatively important portion of the area where managementof a cluster is proposed among multiple owners.This option requires coordination between large industrial forest landownersand the state and its forest practices regulation mechanism. A state-sponsoredhabitat conservation plan (HCP) for the northern spotted owl in California isbeing drafted that will provide the coordination necessary to accomplishmanagement suggested by this option.California Cascades ProvinceProvince descriptionThe California Cascades province is located in the center of the north end ofthe state, between the Oregon Cascades province, the Klamath provinces, andthe range of the California spotted owl at the north end of the Sierra Nevada.Suitable owl habitat generally is fragmented on a broad scale by the ShastaValley, Mt. Shasta, and other high elevation areas, areas of unsuitable soils,and areas of marginal, low elevation habitats. Suitable forest habitat is predominatelyon two national forests although there are significant blocks andcheckerboard ownership areas where forests occur on mostly industrial privatelands. This area forms the linkage between the range of the northern spottedowl and the range of the California spotted owl.193
- Page 158 and 159: Supplemental pair areas - Habitat d
- Page 160 and 161: Numbers of owls currently are estim
- Page 162 and 163: Biological goals and implementation
- Page 164 and 165: ning. Also, several unsurveyed area
- Page 166 and 167: Owl pairsKnown owlsin the province3
- Page 168 and 169: - Initiate long-range planning effo
- Page 170 and 171: Table 3.8. Summary comments on the
- Page 172 and 173: from nonfederal lands are needed to
- Page 174 and 175: Eastern Washington Cascades Provinc
- Page 176 and 177: (Owl pairs140 - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- Page 178 and 179: habitat in DCA WD- 16. Approximatel
- Page 180 and 181: Table 3.12. Summary comments on the
- Page 182 and 183: Ttllwrnook/Astoria area. Provide su
- Page 184 and 185: connectivity between key DCAs. This
- Page 186 and 187: ITable 3.14. Summary comments on th
- Page 188 and 189: crest of the Cascade Mountains. The
- Page 190 and 191: ITable 3.16. Summary comments on th
- Page 192 and 193: sites on federal lands (figure 3.21
- Page 194 and 195: Owl pairsL I 350- _ _ . ...........
- Page 196 and 197: DCAs, often combined with adjacent
- Page 198 and 199: Owl pairsLiKnown owlsin the provinc
- Page 200 and 201: nesting and roosting habitat until
- Page 202 and 203: Option 3: Management of clusters: g
- Page 204 and 205: Table 3.21. Summary of acreage and
- Page 206 and 207: Owl pairs -Known owlsin the provinc
- Page 210 and 211: Spotted owls have been found at 86
- Page 212 and 213: ITable 3.24. Summary comments on th
- Page 214 and 215: their distance from other sites. Ar
- Page 216 and 217: * Recommend population and habitat
- Page 218 and 219: away in some or all of the range. D
- Page 220 and 221: 4. What are the population dynamics
- Page 222 and 223: If the monitoring and research prog
- Page 224 and 225: lowlands, eastern Oregon Cascades,
- Page 226 and 227: 210
- Page 228 and 229: Stepdown Outline1. Management Tasks
- Page 230 and 231: Table 4.1 Abbreviated Cost TableThe
- Page 232 and 233: continued-TaskPriorityResp. PartyCo
- Page 234 and 235: 218
- Page 236 and 237: 220
- Page 238 and 239: and the number of invertebrate anim
- Page 240 and 241: Table 5.2. Numbers of other species
- Page 242 and 243: Amphibians and Reptiles: Larch Moun
- Page 244 and 245: 228
- Page 246 and 247: 230
- Page 248 and 249: Barrows, C. W. 1980. Feeding ecolog
- Page 250 and 251: Clark, R. J., D. G. Smith, and L. H
- Page 252 and 253: Franklin, A. B., J. A. Blakesley, a
- Page 254 and 255: Harestad, A. S., and F. L. Bunnell.
- Page 256 and 257: Lundquist, R. W. and J. M. Mariani.
confine site location to a specific drainage and would be within 0.5 miles of <strong>the</strong>activity center.This option would provide <strong>the</strong> best demographic support <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> populations in<strong>the</strong>se areas where habitat conditions preclude maintaining large enoughclusters to provide a good chance of maintaining a viable population over time.Over time this might result in <strong>for</strong>ming larger clusters than currently possibleand in increasing local population stability.This option would require extensive owl surveys to identify owl sites and tomonitor implementation. The option creates a disincentive to locate owl sitesand an incentive to harvest suitable but unoccupied habitat. Managementstrategies <strong>for</strong> areas where spatial distribution of known locations do not.match" with needs to support DCAs.Option 4: Landscape-based habitat managementThis option would require maintaining dispersal habitat on inholdings withinDCA boundaries in <strong>the</strong> western zone, but would provide incentives <strong>for</strong> maintainingnesting, <strong>for</strong>aging, and roosting habitat. Category 2 DCAs and reservedpair areas in <strong>the</strong> eastern and sou<strong>the</strong>rn zones would be supported by providingsuitable habitat in areas within major watersheds included within DCA boundaries.Specific location of suitable habitat <strong>for</strong> activity centers would not bespecified, but quantity and quality would be ensured at <strong>the</strong> watershed level.Suitable habitat to support 10 pairs of owls would be maintained in easternTrinity County, using existing federal lands as <strong>the</strong> basis. Specific owl sitelocations and cluster boundaries would not be designated.This option provides greater flexibility to <strong>the</strong> private landowner. It would notrequire owl surveys to <strong>the</strong> extent of o<strong>the</strong>r options. The option provides incentives<strong>for</strong> landowners to participate in landscape level management, and tolocate owls or manage habitat in desirable locations.Coordination. Land ownership is dominated by <strong>the</strong> national <strong>for</strong>ests. Privatelands in <strong>the</strong> province are primarily large industrial <strong>for</strong>est holdings. BLM landsconstitute a small but relatively important portion of <strong>the</strong> area where managementof a cluster is proposed among multiple owners.This option requires coordination between large industrial <strong>for</strong>est landownersand <strong>the</strong> state and its <strong>for</strong>est practices regulation mechanism. A state-sponsoredhabitat conservation plan (HCP) <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn spotted owl in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia isbeing drafted that will provide <strong>the</strong> coordination necessary to accomplishmanagement suggested by this option.Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Cascades ProvinceProvince descriptionThe Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Cascades province is located in <strong>the</strong> center of <strong>the</strong> north end of<strong>the</strong> state, between <strong>the</strong> Oregon Cascades province, <strong>the</strong> Klamath provinces, and<strong>the</strong> range of <strong>the</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia spotted owl at <strong>the</strong> north end of <strong>the</strong> Sierra Nevada.Suitable owl habitat generally is fragmented on a broad scale by <strong>the</strong> ShastaValley, Mt. Shasta, and o<strong>the</strong>r high elevation areas, areas of unsuitable soils,and areas of marginal, low elevation habitats. Suitable <strong>for</strong>est habitat is predominatelyon two national <strong>for</strong>ests although <strong>the</strong>re are significant blocks andcheckerboard ownership areas where <strong>for</strong>ests occur on mostly industrial privatelands. This area <strong>for</strong>ms <strong>the</strong> linkage between <strong>the</strong> range of <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn spottedowl and <strong>the</strong> range of <strong>the</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia spotted owl.193