Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

10.07.2015 Views

crest of the Cascade Mountains. There were approximately 163 owl pairslocated in the province between 1986 and 1990, representing about 9 percentof the known state population. The province consists primarily of federal land,including parts of the Mt. Hood, Deschutes, and Winema National Forests,Crater Lake National Park, and the Lakeview District of the BLM. Nonfederalland includes private and state lands primarily south of the Winema NationalForest. This nonfederal-land includes one area of special management emphasis.The area between OD-19 and the Califomia border. The area from DCAOD- 19 to the California border has been identified as an area for specialmanagement emphasis, where BLM, private, and state lands are intermingled.Owl habitat has been reduced and fragmented in this area,resulting in poor population connectivity with the California Cascadesprovince. A further concern is the risk of habitat loss from fire.Serious threats to the spotted owl population in the province include poordistribution as a result of low owl density and fragmented habitat, and risk ofcatastrophic habitat destruction due to wildfire (section II.B. and Appendix F).The Warm Springs Indian Reservation occurs within this province. Recoverycontributions provided by the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs aredescribed in section II.C.8.Biological goals and implementation on federal landsOne category 1 DCA and 12 category 2 DCAs are recommended in this province(Tables 3.15. and 3.16.). Approximately 62 pairs of owls have beenlocated on federal lands in these DCAs. This represents about 42 percent ofthe 146 pairs located on all federal lands in the province (Figure 3.19). Approximately26 percent of the nesting, roosting, and foraging habitat identifiedon federal lands in the province is located within the DCAs (Figure 3.20). Themajority of federal forest land outside the DCAs should be managed undermatrix prescription A (section III.C.2.). This includes establishing residualhabitat areas around activity centers in the matrix up to a maximum density ofsix areas per township. However, in the portion of the province in theDeschutes National Forest, it is recommended that reserved pair areas (matrixprescription B) be established around all currently known and future-discoveredactivity centers in the matrix.Biological goals and implementation on nonfederal landsThe recovery objective for nonfederal lands is to provide habitat to improvedispersal conditions in the area of special management emphasis.Area between OD-19 and the Califomia border. This area consists ofcheckerboard ownership, but is dominated by nonfederal lands. Nonfederalcontributions should work in conjunction with federal habitat in thisarea to provide for dispersal between the eastern Oregon Cascades andthe California Cascades. Where ecological potential exists, nestinghabitat also could be provided in this area to improve the likelihood ofdispersal among provinces. The prohibition on take is unlikely to makesubstantial contributions toward meeting these objectives because fewowl sites are known on nonfederal lands in this area.The recovery plan should be used to help guide compliance with Oregon'sEndangered Species Act programs on state lands and provide an incentive for172

conservation planning. To the extent that the recovery plan and the stateEndangered Species Act programs can be made consistent, coordinationbetween them will be improved.Oregon Klamath ProvinceProvince descriptionThe Klamath province starts in the southern third of Oregon and extendssouth about 250 miles through most of northern California. The topography ofthe province is characterized by the mountainous terrain of the Klamath andSiskiyou mountains. For the purposes of the recovery plan, the Klamath hasbeen separated into the Oregon Klamath province and the California Klamathprovince. This discussion focuses on the Oregon Klamath province.The northern spotted owl population in the province is the major populationlink between the Oregon Coast Range and western Oregon Cascades provinces.It provides the primary connection between spotted owl populations in Oregonand California. The province contains approximately 390 known pairs ofspotted owls. Approximately 360 of these are located on federal lands. Na-Table 3.15. Summary of acreage and owl pairs for designated conservation areas (DCAs)and for all lands in the eastern Oregon Cascade province. (More detailed information,including projected owl pairs on nonfederal lands, is in Appendix J, Table J.7.)AcreageOwl PairsDCA Percent NRF Current FutureIdent. Federal Habitat Known Owls 3 Projected ProjectedNumber Total Land 1 Federal 2 Federal Nonfed Federal 4 Federal 5OD-2 74,558 99 51,200 21 0 21 26OD-41 9,855 90 4,560 1 0 1 2OD-42 20,000 100 8,520 4 0 4 5OD-43 29,367 98 7,840 5 0 5 6OD-44 16,532 100 8,560 4 0 4 4OD-45 18,256 99 4,240 1 0 1 3OD-51 28,601 99 9,320 7 0 7 7OD-59 41,858 95 20,783 13 0 13 18OD-60 3,023 100 480 1 0 1 1OD-61 3,001 100 720 1 0 1 1OD-62 2,705 100 1,400 1 0 1 1OD-63 3,013 71 800 1 0 1 1OD-64 3,063 100 520 1 0 1 1OD-65 3,028 82 760 1 0 1 1Totals: 256,860 98 119,703 62 0 62 77Totals for all lands in province: 455,156 146 17'Management of nonfederal lands within the perimeter of designated conservation areas is discussed in the narrative.2 NRF = nesting, roosting, and foraging habitat for spotted owls. Habitat information was not available for nonfederal lands.3 Numbers are pairs of spotted owls verified in a 5-year period either 1986 through 1990 or 1987 through 1991.4 This is an estimate of the number of pairs of owls that the DCA would be expected to support on federal lands if the population stabilized withcurrent habitat conditions. See Appendix J for further details.5 This is an estimate of the number of pairs of owls that the DCA might support in the future on federal lands if habitat were recovered. SeeAppendix J for further details.--..........................173

crest of <strong>the</strong> Cascade Mountains. There were approximately 163 owl pairslocated in <strong>the</strong> province between 1986 and 1990, representing about 9 percentof <strong>the</strong> known state population. The province consists primarily of federal land,including parts of <strong>the</strong> Mt. Hood, Deschutes, and Winema National Forests,Crater Lake National Park, and <strong>the</strong> Lakeview District of <strong>the</strong> BLM. Nonfederalland includes private and state lands primarily south of <strong>the</strong> Winema NationalForest. This nonfederal-land includes one area of special management emphasis.The area between OD-19 and <strong>the</strong> Califomia border. The area from DCAOD- 19 to <strong>the</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia border has been identified as an area <strong>for</strong> specialmanagement emphasis, where BLM, private, and state lands are intermingled.<strong>Owl</strong> habitat has been reduced and fragmented in this area,resulting in poor population connectivity with <strong>the</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Cascadesprovince. A fur<strong>the</strong>r concern is <strong>the</strong> risk of habitat loss from fire.Serious threats to <strong>the</strong> spotted owl population in <strong>the</strong> province include poordistribution as a result of low owl density and fragmented habitat, and risk ofcatastrophic habitat destruction due to wildfire (section II.B. and Appendix F).The Warm Springs Indian Reservation occurs within this province. <strong>Recovery</strong>contributions provided by <strong>the</strong> Confederated Tribes of <strong>the</strong> Warm Springs aredescribed in section II.C.8.Biological goals and implementation on federal landsOne category 1 DCA and 12 category 2 DCAs are recommended in this province(Tables 3.15. and 3.16.). Approximately 62 pairs of owls have beenlocated on federal lands in <strong>the</strong>se DCAs. This represents about 42 percent of<strong>the</strong> 146 pairs located on all federal lands in <strong>the</strong> province (Figure 3.19). Approximately26 percent of <strong>the</strong> nesting, roosting, and <strong>for</strong>aging habitat identifiedon federal lands in <strong>the</strong> province is located within <strong>the</strong> DCAs (Figure 3.20). Themajority of federal <strong>for</strong>est land outside <strong>the</strong> DCAs should be managed undermatrix prescription A (section III.C.2.). This includes establishing residualhabitat areas around activity centers in <strong>the</strong> matrix up to a maximum density ofsix areas per township. However, in <strong>the</strong> portion of <strong>the</strong> province in <strong>the</strong>Deschutes National Forest, it is recommended that reserved pair areas (matrixprescription B) be established around all currently known and future-discoveredactivity centers in <strong>the</strong> matrix.Biological goals and implementation on nonfederal landsThe recovery objective <strong>for</strong> nonfederal lands is to provide habitat to improvedispersal conditions in <strong>the</strong> area of special management emphasis.Area between OD-19 and <strong>the</strong> Califomia border. This area consists ofcheckerboard ownership, but is dominated by nonfederal lands. Nonfederalcontributions should work in conjunction with federal habitat in thisarea to provide <strong>for</strong> dispersal between <strong>the</strong> eastern Oregon Cascades and<strong>the</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Cascades. Where ecological potential exists, nestinghabitat also could be provided in this area to improve <strong>the</strong> likelihood ofdispersal among provinces. The prohibition on take is unlikely to makesubstantial contributions toward meeting <strong>the</strong>se objectives because fewowl sites are known on nonfederal lands in this area.The recovery plan should be used to help guide compliance with Oregon'sEndangered Species Act programs on state lands and provide an incentive <strong>for</strong>172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!