Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
crest of the Cascade Mountains. There were approximately 163 owl pairslocated in the province between 1986 and 1990, representing about 9 percentof the known state population. The province consists primarily of federal land,including parts of the Mt. Hood, Deschutes, and Winema National Forests,Crater Lake National Park, and the Lakeview District of the BLM. Nonfederalland includes private and state lands primarily south of the Winema NationalForest. This nonfederal-land includes one area of special management emphasis.The area between OD-19 and the Califomia border. The area from DCAOD- 19 to the California border has been identified as an area for specialmanagement emphasis, where BLM, private, and state lands are intermingled.Owl habitat has been reduced and fragmented in this area,resulting in poor population connectivity with the California Cascadesprovince. A further concern is the risk of habitat loss from fire.Serious threats to the spotted owl population in the province include poordistribution as a result of low owl density and fragmented habitat, and risk ofcatastrophic habitat destruction due to wildfire (section II.B. and Appendix F).The Warm Springs Indian Reservation occurs within this province. Recoverycontributions provided by the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs aredescribed in section II.C.8.Biological goals and implementation on federal landsOne category 1 DCA and 12 category 2 DCAs are recommended in this province(Tables 3.15. and 3.16.). Approximately 62 pairs of owls have beenlocated on federal lands in these DCAs. This represents about 42 percent ofthe 146 pairs located on all federal lands in the province (Figure 3.19). Approximately26 percent of the nesting, roosting, and foraging habitat identifiedon federal lands in the province is located within the DCAs (Figure 3.20). Themajority of federal forest land outside the DCAs should be managed undermatrix prescription A (section III.C.2.). This includes establishing residualhabitat areas around activity centers in the matrix up to a maximum density ofsix areas per township. However, in the portion of the province in theDeschutes National Forest, it is recommended that reserved pair areas (matrixprescription B) be established around all currently known and future-discoveredactivity centers in the matrix.Biological goals and implementation on nonfederal landsThe recovery objective for nonfederal lands is to provide habitat to improvedispersal conditions in the area of special management emphasis.Area between OD-19 and the Califomia border. This area consists ofcheckerboard ownership, but is dominated by nonfederal lands. Nonfederalcontributions should work in conjunction with federal habitat in thisarea to provide for dispersal between the eastern Oregon Cascades andthe California Cascades. Where ecological potential exists, nestinghabitat also could be provided in this area to improve the likelihood ofdispersal among provinces. The prohibition on take is unlikely to makesubstantial contributions toward meeting these objectives because fewowl sites are known on nonfederal lands in this area.The recovery plan should be used to help guide compliance with Oregon'sEndangered Species Act programs on state lands and provide an incentive for172
conservation planning. To the extent that the recovery plan and the stateEndangered Species Act programs can be made consistent, coordinationbetween them will be improved.Oregon Klamath ProvinceProvince descriptionThe Klamath province starts in the southern third of Oregon and extendssouth about 250 miles through most of northern California. The topography ofthe province is characterized by the mountainous terrain of the Klamath andSiskiyou mountains. For the purposes of the recovery plan, the Klamath hasbeen separated into the Oregon Klamath province and the California Klamathprovince. This discussion focuses on the Oregon Klamath province.The northern spotted owl population in the province is the major populationlink between the Oregon Coast Range and western Oregon Cascades provinces.It provides the primary connection between spotted owl populations in Oregonand California. The province contains approximately 390 known pairs ofspotted owls. Approximately 360 of these are located on federal lands. Na-Table 3.15. Summary of acreage and owl pairs for designated conservation areas (DCAs)and for all lands in the eastern Oregon Cascade province. (More detailed information,including projected owl pairs on nonfederal lands, is in Appendix J, Table J.7.)AcreageOwl PairsDCA Percent NRF Current FutureIdent. Federal Habitat Known Owls 3 Projected ProjectedNumber Total Land 1 Federal 2 Federal Nonfed Federal 4 Federal 5OD-2 74,558 99 51,200 21 0 21 26OD-41 9,855 90 4,560 1 0 1 2OD-42 20,000 100 8,520 4 0 4 5OD-43 29,367 98 7,840 5 0 5 6OD-44 16,532 100 8,560 4 0 4 4OD-45 18,256 99 4,240 1 0 1 3OD-51 28,601 99 9,320 7 0 7 7OD-59 41,858 95 20,783 13 0 13 18OD-60 3,023 100 480 1 0 1 1OD-61 3,001 100 720 1 0 1 1OD-62 2,705 100 1,400 1 0 1 1OD-63 3,013 71 800 1 0 1 1OD-64 3,063 100 520 1 0 1 1OD-65 3,028 82 760 1 0 1 1Totals: 256,860 98 119,703 62 0 62 77Totals for all lands in province: 455,156 146 17'Management of nonfederal lands within the perimeter of designated conservation areas is discussed in the narrative.2 NRF = nesting, roosting, and foraging habitat for spotted owls. Habitat information was not available for nonfederal lands.3 Numbers are pairs of spotted owls verified in a 5-year period either 1986 through 1990 or 1987 through 1991.4 This is an estimate of the number of pairs of owls that the DCA would be expected to support on federal lands if the population stabilized withcurrent habitat conditions. See Appendix J for further details.5 This is an estimate of the number of pairs of owls that the DCA might support in the future on federal lands if habitat were recovered. SeeAppendix J for further details.--..........................173
- Page 138 and 139: owls. (Refer to tables in section I
- Page 140 and 141: PRESCRIPTION D -RETAIN OWLS IN MANA
- Page 142 and 143: 126
- Page 144 and 145: DCA Management Plans.The recovery p
- Page 146 and 147: Endangered Species Act) or through
- Page 148 and 149: 6. Costs to landowners should be re
- Page 150 and 151: The real or perceived disincentives
- Page 152 and 153: authority of the public body to ent
- Page 154 and 155: * Use the recovery plan's recommend
- Page 156 and 157: 140
- Page 158 and 159: Supplemental pair areas - Habitat d
- Page 160 and 161: Numbers of owls currently are estim
- Page 162 and 163: Biological goals and implementation
- Page 164 and 165: ning. Also, several unsurveyed area
- Page 166 and 167: Owl pairsKnown owlsin the province3
- Page 168 and 169: - Initiate long-range planning effo
- Page 170 and 171: Table 3.8. Summary comments on the
- Page 172 and 173: from nonfederal lands are needed to
- Page 174 and 175: Eastern Washington Cascades Provinc
- Page 176 and 177: (Owl pairs140 - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- Page 178 and 179: habitat in DCA WD- 16. Approximatel
- Page 180 and 181: Table 3.12. Summary comments on the
- Page 182 and 183: Ttllwrnook/Astoria area. Provide su
- Page 184 and 185: connectivity between key DCAs. This
- Page 186 and 187: ITable 3.14. Summary comments on th
- Page 190 and 191: ITable 3.16. Summary comments on th
- Page 192 and 193: sites on federal lands (figure 3.21
- Page 194 and 195: Owl pairsL I 350- _ _ . ...........
- Page 196 and 197: DCAs, often combined with adjacent
- Page 198 and 199: Owl pairsLiKnown owlsin the provinc
- Page 200 and 201: nesting and roosting habitat until
- Page 202 and 203: Option 3: Management of clusters: g
- Page 204 and 205: Table 3.21. Summary of acreage and
- Page 206 and 207: Owl pairs -Known owlsin the provinc
- Page 208 and 209: and to within 0.5 miles of the acti
- Page 210 and 211: Spotted owls have been found at 86
- Page 212 and 213: ITable 3.24. Summary comments on th
- Page 214 and 215: their distance from other sites. Ar
- Page 216 and 217: * Recommend population and habitat
- Page 218 and 219: away in some or all of the range. D
- Page 220 and 221: 4. What are the population dynamics
- Page 222 and 223: If the monitoring and research prog
- Page 224 and 225: lowlands, eastern Oregon Cascades,
- Page 226 and 227: 210
- Page 228 and 229: Stepdown Outline1. Management Tasks
- Page 230 and 231: Table 4.1 Abbreviated Cost TableThe
- Page 232 and 233: continued-TaskPriorityResp. PartyCo
- Page 234 and 235: 218
- Page 236 and 237: 220
crest of <strong>the</strong> Cascade Mountains. There were approximately 163 owl pairslocated in <strong>the</strong> province between 1986 and 1990, representing about 9 percentof <strong>the</strong> known state population. The province consists primarily of federal land,including parts of <strong>the</strong> Mt. Hood, Deschutes, and Winema National Forests,Crater Lake National Park, and <strong>the</strong> Lakeview District of <strong>the</strong> BLM. Nonfederalland includes private and state lands primarily south of <strong>the</strong> Winema NationalForest. This nonfederal-land includes one area of special management emphasis.The area between OD-19 and <strong>the</strong> Califomia border. The area from DCAOD- 19 to <strong>the</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia border has been identified as an area <strong>for</strong> specialmanagement emphasis, where BLM, private, and state lands are intermingled.<strong>Owl</strong> habitat has been reduced and fragmented in this area,resulting in poor population connectivity with <strong>the</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Cascadesprovince. A fur<strong>the</strong>r concern is <strong>the</strong> risk of habitat loss from fire.Serious threats to <strong>the</strong> spotted owl population in <strong>the</strong> province include poordistribution as a result of low owl density and fragmented habitat, and risk ofcatastrophic habitat destruction due to wildfire (section II.B. and Appendix F).The Warm Springs Indian Reservation occurs within this province. <strong>Recovery</strong>contributions provided by <strong>the</strong> Confederated Tribes of <strong>the</strong> Warm Springs aredescribed in section II.C.8.Biological goals and implementation on federal landsOne category 1 DCA and 12 category 2 DCAs are recommended in this province(Tables 3.15. and 3.16.). Approximately 62 pairs of owls have beenlocated on federal lands in <strong>the</strong>se DCAs. This represents about 42 percent of<strong>the</strong> 146 pairs located on all federal lands in <strong>the</strong> province (Figure 3.19). Approximately26 percent of <strong>the</strong> nesting, roosting, and <strong>for</strong>aging habitat identifiedon federal lands in <strong>the</strong> province is located within <strong>the</strong> DCAs (Figure 3.20). Themajority of federal <strong>for</strong>est land outside <strong>the</strong> DCAs should be managed undermatrix prescription A (section III.C.2.). This includes establishing residualhabitat areas around activity centers in <strong>the</strong> matrix up to a maximum density ofsix areas per township. However, in <strong>the</strong> portion of <strong>the</strong> province in <strong>the</strong>Deschutes National Forest, it is recommended that reserved pair areas (matrixprescription B) be established around all currently known and future-discoveredactivity centers in <strong>the</strong> matrix.Biological goals and implementation on nonfederal landsThe recovery objective <strong>for</strong> nonfederal lands is to provide habitat to improvedispersal conditions in <strong>the</strong> area of special management emphasis.Area between OD-19 and <strong>the</strong> Califomia border. This area consists ofcheckerboard ownership, but is dominated by nonfederal lands. Nonfederalcontributions should work in conjunction with federal habitat in thisarea to provide <strong>for</strong> dispersal between <strong>the</strong> eastern Oregon Cascades and<strong>the</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Cascades. Where ecological potential exists, nestinghabitat also could be provided in this area to improve <strong>the</strong> likelihood ofdispersal among provinces. The prohibition on take is unlikely to makesubstantial contributions toward meeting <strong>the</strong>se objectives because fewowl sites are known on nonfederal lands in this area.The recovery plan should be used to help guide compliance with Oregon'sEndangered Species Act programs on state lands and provide an incentive <strong>for</strong>172