10.07.2015 Views

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Supplemental pair areas - Habitat delineated <strong>for</strong> pairs or territorialsingle spotted owls on nonfederal lands. Such habitat is managed orreserved, depending on agreements made. These areas are intended tosupplement population deficiencies in <strong>the</strong> federal DCA network. The sizeof <strong>the</strong>se areas will vary by province.Nortfederal clusters - Habitat provided to support a localized cluster ofsupplemental spotted owl pair areas intended to contribute to owl populationneeds as described in <strong>the</strong> province narratives.Protective management - Measures taken by nonfederal entities toconserve spotted owls and/or <strong>the</strong>ir habitat; measures may includeparticipation in conservation planning (as defined in Endangered SpeciesAct section 10) or o<strong>the</strong>r actions that benefit owls; entities may be states,private landowners, Indian tribes, or o<strong>the</strong>rs.The biological recommendations <strong>for</strong> nonfederal lands take several <strong>for</strong>ms. Thestatus of local owl populations and habitat conditions determines whe<strong>the</strong>rrecommendations are made <strong>for</strong> specific areas, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>m of those recommendations.The biological principles underlying <strong>the</strong>se recommendations arediscussed in section III.B.2. Specific recommendations <strong>for</strong> each province arediscussed in <strong>the</strong> province narratives. They generally can be described in one of<strong>the</strong> following ways.1. Nonfederal lands within DCAs - Provide adequate nesting, roosting, and<strong>for</strong>aging habitat, in conjunction with federal lands, to achieve <strong>the</strong> DCAs'target <strong>for</strong> owl numbers and demographic stability. This could apply tocheckerboard and non-checkerboard ownership patterns. It may include<strong>the</strong> provision of supplemental pair areas. This habitat may be ei<strong>the</strong>r managedor reserved from timber harvest, depending on <strong>the</strong> protective managementagreements <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> area.2. Nonfederal population clusters - Establishing large clusters of owls isrecommended in some areas where federal lands cannot support <strong>the</strong> recoveryobjective without contribution from o<strong>the</strong>r ownerships (e.g., southwestWashington, nor<strong>the</strong>ast Oregon, and coastal Cali<strong>for</strong>nia). This would requirethat habitat be provided <strong>for</strong> a cluster of breeding owl pairs with contiguousor nearly contiguous home ranges, and <strong>for</strong> floater owls and dispersingjuveniles. Clusters would include 15 or more owl pairs to provide at leastshort-term population stability. The size of an area provided <strong>for</strong> a clusterwill depend on <strong>the</strong> current suitability and natural potential of habitat, <strong>the</strong>possibility of natural disturbance, and <strong>the</strong> type and level of <strong>for</strong>est managementproposed within <strong>the</strong> area. Clusters provide <strong>the</strong> opportunity to exploreand test hypo<strong>the</strong>ses about owl response to <strong>for</strong>est management that may notbe tested within <strong>the</strong> federal DCA network. Generally, a large cluster of owlpairs would require 30,000 to 100,000 acres of habitat managed <strong>for</strong> owls.As with supplemental pair areas, habitat <strong>for</strong> a population cluster may beei<strong>the</strong>r managed or reserved from timber harvest, depending on <strong>the</strong> protectivemanagement agreements <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> area.In areas of low owl density, where goals <strong>for</strong> large clusters cannot be metfully, this recommendation may be modified to provide <strong>for</strong> smaller owlclusters. Small clusters have a lower assurance of population stability thanlarge clusters.142Alternatively, in some areas a recommendation is made <strong>for</strong> supplementalpair areas distributed across <strong>the</strong> landscape at a density lower than thatdescribed <strong>for</strong> clusters. This may provide <strong>for</strong> a self-sustaining local populationbut with considerably less long-term population stability than clusters.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!