10.07.2015 Views

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Implementation tools are defined as:1. Existing reserves. State, county, or local parks, known conservationeasements, or o<strong>the</strong>r areas that have binding, en<strong>for</strong>ceable restrictions on<strong>the</strong> level of timber harvest and o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>for</strong>est management activities that arelikely to alter <strong>the</strong> amount of suitable owl habitat. Existing reserves mustbe evaluated on 1) <strong>the</strong> level of current habitat within <strong>the</strong>m, 2) size, 3)number, 4) spacing, and 5) timing of future habitat achieving owl suitabilitycharacteristics.2. Private voluntary actions. Actions that are not required by statute orregulation, but that landowners voluntarily undertake. Actions caninclude, <strong>for</strong> example, long-term management plans, commitments to longrotations per uneven-aged management, or easements. Such actions mustbe evaluated on 1) how binding <strong>the</strong> actions are over time, 2) effectiveness inproviding <strong>the</strong> conservation measures (number of owls, amount and configurationof habitat) stated in <strong>the</strong> recovery objective, 3) timing of <strong>the</strong>contribution of suitable habitat, and 4) how attractive <strong>the</strong>y are to landownersto undertake.3. Forest practices statute and regulations. Statutes and rules en<strong>for</strong>ced bystate or local government that require certain practices be used or certainhabitat conditions be maintained. Depending on <strong>the</strong> definition of differenttypes of owl habitat, <strong>the</strong>se requirements can contribute to certain habitatobjectives. Statutes and regulations must be evaluated on 1) currentrequirements <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> provision of conservation measures detailed in <strong>the</strong>recovery objective, 2) whe<strong>the</strong>r current state statutes authorize promulgationand en<strong>for</strong>cement of additional regulations, and 3) ability, ease, andtiming requirements of passing new state legislation.4. Prohibition on taking. Refers to <strong>the</strong> Endangered Species Act prohibition oftake of individuals, as implemented and en<strong>for</strong>ced by <strong>the</strong> FWS. The relativeease of implementing an option will be increased to <strong>the</strong> extent that protectionof individuals (on a case-by-case approach) implements <strong>the</strong> conservationmeasures in a recovery objective. The current take prohibition doesnot provide a long-term contribution to recovery. The success of <strong>the</strong>prohibition in contributing to recovery is variable, and dependent upon <strong>the</strong>province and existing conditions within owl home ranges. Application oftake prohibition guidelines must be evaluated <strong>for</strong> consistency of results,fairness, uni<strong>for</strong>mity of en<strong>for</strong>cement, and adequacy of protection.5. Landscape management as a basis<strong>for</strong> modifying <strong>the</strong> take prohibition.Refers to providing suitable habitat adequate to meet <strong>the</strong> conservationobjective, without necessarily focusing on <strong>the</strong> location of individuals orpairs. Landscape management may provide a basis <strong>for</strong> allowing an increasedlevel of take. The potential role of landscape management mustbe assessed relative to <strong>the</strong> current number of known owl sites contributingto recovery objectives and <strong>the</strong> current burden of surveys (see ProtectiveManagement Guidelines, point #5). The Endangered Species Act providesmechanisms <strong>for</strong> landscape habitat management, including <strong>the</strong> habitatconservation plan (HCP) or section 4(d) rules.6. Critical habitat. See description under Federal Implementation in sectionIII.C.7. Land exchange. Exchanging public land (fee title) <strong>for</strong> state and privatelands to secure a particular location and/or management. This tool mustbe evaluated on 1) <strong>the</strong> availability of public land of equal value <strong>for</strong> exchange,2) <strong>the</strong> ownership of <strong>the</strong> public land (federal, state, county), 3) <strong>the</strong>135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!