Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
2. Fuelwood Gathering. If allowed, fuelwood gathering will be restricted toexisting cull decks, blowdown blocking roads, or green trees marked bysilviculturists to thin overstocked unsuitable habitat. These areas will bemapped during preparation of the DCA management plan and mitigationrecommendations will be included.3. Mining. The impacts of proposed mining actions should be assessed,and mineral activity permits will include appropriate conditions (e.g.,seasonal or other restrictions) related to all phases of mineral activity.4. Developments. In general, construction or development of new facilitiesthat may adversely affect owl habitat or reproductive success will notoccur within DCAs. Proposals that address public needs or providesignificant public benefits, such as powerlines, pipelines, or other publicworks projects, will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis and may beapproved when adverse effects can be minimized and mitigated. Wheneverpossible, such projects should be anticipated and addressed in DCAmanagement plans.5. Trail Development. New trail construction will be planned to have theleast possible adverse effect on owls. Trails will be located at least onequartermile from owl activity centers and otherwise avoid adverse modificationof suitable owl habitat.6. Land Exchanges. Land exchanges in DCAs will be considered when theywill either promote owl recovery or provide owl benefits equal to currentconditions at a lower cost.7. Habitat Improvement Projects. Projects designed to improve conditionsfor fish, wildlife, watershed, range, or recreation will be considered if theyprovide owl habitat benefits or enhance the likelihood of reproductivesuccess. Other projects will be considered if their effect on owls or owlhabitat is negligible. These may include small projects required forrecovery of other threatened or endangered species. In all cases, appropriateproject management will be provided. For example, watershedrehabilitation projects, such as felling trees along streams, will be coordinatedwith a wildlife biologist and include seasonal restrictions.8. Range Facilities. Range-related facilities that do not affect owls or owlhabitat adversely will be developed in coordination with wildlife biologists.Existing grazing activities which have an adverse effect on owl habitat orowl use of the area will be modified.9. Fire Suppression and Prevention. Fuels management within the DCAwill be in accordance with guidelines for reducing risks of large-scaledisturbances. Plans for wildfire suppression will emphasize maintainingowl habitat within the DCA. During actual fire suppression activities, aresource specialist familiar with the area and the DCA management planwill be included to assure that habitat damage is minimized.10. Christmas Tree Sales. Christmas tree sales will be allowed in areaswhere trees are removed in accordance with the objective of acceleratingthe development of suitable habitat conditions in areas that currently areunsuitable. The guidelines for silvicultural activities will be used asappropriate.11. Minor Forest Products. Minor commercial uses, such as the collectionof ferns, mosses, and mushrooms, generally will be allowed. Where theseactivities are extensive (e.g., collection of Pacific yew bark), it will be118
appropriate to evaluate whether they have significant effects on owlhabitat. Restrictions may be appropriate in some cases.12. Recreational Uses. Dispersed recreational uses, including hunting,generally are consistent with the objectives of DCAs, except as specificallynoted elsewhere in the draft recovery plan.13. Research. A variety of wildlife and other research activities (e.g., waterquality) may be proposed in DCAs. These activities must be assessed todetermine if they are consistent with DCA management guidelines. Ifagencies address the range of these activities explicitly in DCA managementplans, disruption of existing research or disincentives for proposedresearch may be avoided, particularly in the case of small and widelydispersed experimental forestlands.14. Rights-of-Way, Contracted Rights, Easements. Existing and proposedagreements will be evaluated and revised where feasible. In some cases,preexisting agreements may pose legal issues or raise other concerns thatrequire consideration in the DCA management plan.b. Other Federal LandsFor the purposes of the recovery plan, the "matrix" is defined as lands withinthe range of northern spotted owls which are outside DCAs. This discussion isspecific to federal matrix lands. Recovery contributions from nonfederal matrixlands are described in section III.C.4.Federal matrix lands will make several essential contributions to recovery.Their most basic function is to help maintain adequate habitat conditions toallow movement of owls among DCAs. As described in section III.B., thisinterchange among DCAs is necessary to allow functioning of the whole spottedowl population. The second function of the matrix is to maintain reproductiveowl pairs, where possible, in areas where DCAs cannot fully meet the criteria(section III.C.2) established by the recovery plan. These pairs will help supplementDCAs where owl populations or habitat are deficient until those deficienciescan be corrected. In some cases, population deficiencies in DCAs may notbe corrected for a long period of time and owl pairs in the matrix will remain apart of the recovery strategy for the foreseeable future. In other areas, thematrix will be required to support pairs of breeding owls as a safeguard againstthe possibility of large-scale loss of habitat in DCAs from fire, insects, anddisease. Finally, the matrix will contain areas of nesting habitat that willpreserve options to reestablish owls throughout the landscape.Since habitat conditions and owl populations vary across the range, specificobjectives for matrix forests also will vary. Four matrix management prescriptionshave been identified. Criteria were developed to determine where theseprescriptions will be applied. Those criteria and the implementation guidelinesare described in this section. The province narratives (section III.C.4) identifythe locations where the prescriptions will be applied and the approximateacreages involved.Recommendations for federal matrix management provide for a broader mix ofactivities than the recommendations for the DCAs. It is expected that a widevariety of commercial timber activities will occur within the matrix, with theirtiming and location designed to meet the conditions specified for the matrix.For several matrix management prescriptions, the acres on which habitat goalsare met may shift through time. For other prescriptions, such as the reservedpair areas, tighter controls on activities are recommended.119
- Page 84 and 85: vation Strategy for the Northern Sp
- Page 86 and 87: transfer of one area to the Grand R
- Page 88 and 89: The BLM Spokane (Washington) Distri
- Page 90 and 91: 3. National Park ServiceThe followi
- Page 92 and 93: The results of a consultation are s
- Page 94 and 95: - Since landowners already face cut
- Page 96 and 97: 4. Cumulative Effects AssessmentThe
- Page 98 and 99: Assessment, Planning, and Monitorin
- Page 100 and 101: Spotted owl nesting sites and activ
- Page 102 and 103: Coastal Oregon Productivity Enhance
- Page 104 and 105: including wildlife. In other cases,
- Page 106 and 107: Currently, the Yakima Indian Nation
- Page 108 and 109: where timber harvest is limited to
- Page 111 and 112: III.A. Recovery Objective and Delis
- Page 113: 4. The population is unlikely to ne
- Page 116 and 117: Needs of other species should be co
- Page 118 and 119: years. The strategy of managing for
- Page 120 and 121: 't0
- Page 122 and 123: Finally, the plan recommends mainta
- Page 124 and 125: A total of 1,181 pairs of owls has
- Page 126 and 127: DKnown owlsin the OregonprovincesKn
- Page 128 and 129: mologists, and representatives of o
- Page 130 and 131: this prey species is an appropriate
- Page 132 and 133: After 100 years residual snags will
- Page 136 and 137: The application of prescriptions A,
- Page 138 and 139: owls. (Refer to tables in section I
- Page 140 and 141: PRESCRIPTION D -RETAIN OWLS IN MANA
- Page 142 and 143: 126
- Page 144 and 145: DCA Management Plans.The recovery p
- Page 146 and 147: Endangered Species Act) or through
- Page 148 and 149: 6. Costs to landowners should be re
- Page 150 and 151: The real or perceived disincentives
- Page 152 and 153: authority of the public body to ent
- Page 154 and 155: * Use the recovery plan's recommend
- Page 156 and 157: 140
- Page 158 and 159: Supplemental pair areas - Habitat d
- Page 160 and 161: Numbers of owls currently are estim
- Page 162 and 163: Biological goals and implementation
- Page 164 and 165: ning. Also, several unsurveyed area
- Page 166 and 167: Owl pairsKnown owlsin the province3
- Page 168 and 169: - Initiate long-range planning effo
- Page 170 and 171: Table 3.8. Summary comments on the
- Page 172 and 173: from nonfederal lands are needed to
- Page 174 and 175: Eastern Washington Cascades Provinc
- Page 176 and 177: (Owl pairs140 - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- Page 178 and 179: habitat in DCA WD- 16. Approximatel
- Page 180 and 181: Table 3.12. Summary comments on the
- Page 182 and 183: Ttllwrnook/Astoria area. Provide su
appropriate to evaluate whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y have significant effects on owlhabitat. Restrictions may be appropriate in some cases.12. Recreational Uses. Dispersed recreational uses, including hunting,generally are consistent with <strong>the</strong> objectives of DCAs, except as specificallynoted elsewhere in <strong>the</strong> draft recovery plan.13. Research. A variety of wildlife and o<strong>the</strong>r research activities (e.g., waterquality) may be proposed in DCAs. These activities must be assessed todetermine if <strong>the</strong>y are consistent with DCA management guidelines. Ifagencies address <strong>the</strong> range of <strong>the</strong>se activities explicitly in DCA managementplans, disruption of existing research or disincentives <strong>for</strong> proposedresearch may be avoided, particularly in <strong>the</strong> case of small and widelydispersed experimental <strong>for</strong>estlands.14. Rights-of-Way, Contracted Rights, Easements. Existing and proposedagreements will be evaluated and revised where feasible. In some cases,preexisting agreements may pose legal issues or raise o<strong>the</strong>r concerns thatrequire consideration in <strong>the</strong> DCA management plan.b. O<strong>the</strong>r Federal LandsFor <strong>the</strong> purposes of <strong>the</strong> recovery plan, <strong>the</strong> "matrix" is defined as lands within<strong>the</strong> range of nor<strong>the</strong>rn spotted owls which are outside DCAs. This discussion isspecific to federal matrix lands. <strong>Recovery</strong> contributions from nonfederal matrixlands are described in section III.C.4.Federal matrix lands will make several essential contributions to recovery.Their most basic function is to help maintain adequate habitat conditions toallow movement of owls among DCAs. As described in section III.B., thisinterchange among DCAs is necessary to allow functioning of <strong>the</strong> whole spottedowl population. The second function of <strong>the</strong> matrix is to maintain reproductiveowl pairs, where possible, in areas where DCAs cannot fully meet <strong>the</strong> criteria(section III.C.2) established by <strong>the</strong> recovery plan. These pairs will help supplementDCAs where owl populations or habitat are deficient until those deficienciescan be corrected. In some cases, population deficiencies in DCAs may notbe corrected <strong>for</strong> a long period of time and owl pairs in <strong>the</strong> matrix will remain apart of <strong>the</strong> recovery strategy <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>eseeable future. In o<strong>the</strong>r areas, <strong>the</strong>matrix will be required to support pairs of breeding owls as a safeguard against<strong>the</strong> possibility of large-scale loss of habitat in DCAs from fire, insects, anddisease. Finally, <strong>the</strong> matrix will contain areas of nesting habitat that willpreserve options to reestablish owls throughout <strong>the</strong> landscape.Since habitat conditions and owl populations vary across <strong>the</strong> range, specificobjectives <strong>for</strong> matrix <strong>for</strong>ests also will vary. Four matrix management prescriptionshave been identified. Criteria were developed to determine where <strong>the</strong>seprescriptions will be applied. Those criteria and <strong>the</strong> implementation guidelinesare described in this section. The province narratives (section III.C.4) identify<strong>the</strong> locations where <strong>the</strong> prescriptions will be applied and <strong>the</strong> approximateacreages involved.Recommendations <strong>for</strong> federal matrix management provide <strong>for</strong> a broader mix ofactivities than <strong>the</strong> recommendations <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> DCAs. It is expected that a widevariety of commercial timber activities will occur within <strong>the</strong> matrix, with <strong>the</strong>irtiming and location designed to meet <strong>the</strong> conditions specified <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> matrix.For several matrix management prescriptions, <strong>the</strong> acres on which habitat goalsare met may shift through time. For o<strong>the</strong>r prescriptions, such as <strong>the</strong> reservedpair areas, tighter controls on activities are recommended.119