Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
this prey species is an appropriate strategy for DCAs. Therefore, snagslarger than 20-inch dbh will be retained.This guideline may need to be refined for application in some physiographicprovinces. However, retention of all stems larger than 20-inchdbh is likely to provide the highest probability of long-term retention ofsnags throughout the owl's range. Management planning in areas suchas northern California may require specific guidance for hardwood snagretention, and to provide habitat for woodrats, a prey species. In allareas, however, the primary focus should be on long-term planning.4. Coarse woody debris (CWD) biomass (i.e., snags and down logs) provideshabitat for organisms that are important food of several owl prey species,as well as having other habitat-enhancing characteristics. In the first 100years after a stand-replacing disturbance, the amount of CWD added bythe new stand is not significant, so retaining remnant CWD from theprevious stand during this time is important. Following a stand-replacingdisturbance, management will provide for CWD quantities in the newstand which, after 100 years, would be similar to amounts in naturallyregenerated stands at that age. As in the case of snags, province-levelspecifications must be provided for this guideline. Since decay rates andbiomass naturally remaining at 100 years undoubtedly will vary amongprovinces and forest types, the specifications also will vary.5. Some salvage that does not meet the preceding guidelines will be allowedwhen salvage is essential to reduce the risk of fire or insect damage tosuitable owl habitat. This circumstance is most likely to occur in theeastern Oregon and eastern Washington Cascades and California Cascadesprovinces, and somewhat less likely in the Oregon and CaliforniaKlamath provinces. It is important to understand that some risk associatedwith fire and insects is acceptable because they are natural forcesinfluencing forest development where owls occur. Consequently, salvageto reduce such risks should be minimal, and considered as an exceptionalpractice.6. Small-scale removal of snags and logs may be necessary to reducehazards to humans along roads and trails and in or adjacent to campgrounds.Where materials must be removed from the site, as in a campground,a salvage sale is appropriate. In other areas, such as alongroads, leaving material on site should be considered. Also, material willbe left where available CWD is inadequate.7. Where green trees, snags, and logs are present following disturbance, theabove green tree and snag guidelines (discussed earlier in this section)will be applied first, and completely satisfied where possible. The biomassleft in snags can be credited toward the amount of CWD biomass neededto achieve management objectives.8. Since remnant CWD may be relatively small after disturbances in youngerstands, diameter and biomass retention guidelines should be consistentwith silvicultural programs designed to regenerate suitable owl habitat.9. Logs present on the forest floor before a disturbance event provide habitatbenefits which are likely to continue. It seldom will be appropriate toremove them. In addition, these logs will not be credited toward objectivesfor CWD retention developed after a disturbance event.10. The CWD retained will approximate the species composition of theoriginal stand, to help replicate preexisting suitable habitat conditions.114
The following section contains an example of the application of salvage guidelinesin the Douglas-fir/Western Hemlock Zone of the western Oregon andWashington Cascades. The example shows how specific guidelines would bedeveloped for an area where an old-growth forest stand suffered catastrophicdisturbance.Applying Salvage Guidelines in Western Washington and OregonThis example is developed for salvage of a hypothetical stand that suffered astand-replacing fire. Prior to the fire, the stand would have been classified asold-growth. Live tree densities for the original stand are in Table 3.1Snag RetentionSnag decomposition rates are related inversely to diameter. Equationsdeveloped by McComb and Ohmann (pers. comm.) predict that in westernWashington and Oregon the probability of snags less than 20-inch dbhpersisting for 100 years is near zero. Above this diameter, probabilities ofsnag survival increase rapidly for western hemlock and Douglas-fir.Snags more than 20-inch dbh are especially important for cavity-nestingbirds. Nelson (1989) found significant selection by cavity-nesters for snagsof this size. Smaller snags were not selected. Carey et al. (1991) andLundquist and Mariani (1991) also found greater use of larger snags. Sinceflying squirrels, an owl prey species, are secondary cavity users, managementfor higher densities of primary cavity-nesters will benefit squirrels and,indirectly, owls. Retention of all snags more than 20-inch dbh will maximizethe number of residual snags available to flying squirrels, while providingimportant habitat for bird species responsible for the excavation of cavitiesused by squirrels.Application of the guidelines for salvage to an old-growth forest in theOregon Cascades will provide retention of an average of 17 Douglas-fir and 9hemlock snags per acre based on mean live-tree densities (Table 3.1) forthose forests (Spies pers. comm.). Because of the diversity of initial diameters,predicting snag population survivorship is complex. However, projectionsbased on decay rate constants of Harmon et al. (1986) suggest thatabout two Douglas-fir snags per acre will remain in 100 years. The equationsof McComb and Ohmann (pers. comm.) predict that as many as four tosix Douglas-fir and one hemlock snags per acre may persist. These estimatesare within the range of densities commonly found in naturally regeneratedstands at that age (Carey et al. 1991, Huff et al. 1991, Spies andFranklin 1991).Table 3.1. Live tree densities in example old-growth western hemlock/Douglas-firstand prior to stand-replacing fire.Stem Density per Acre by Size Class2 to 4 inches 4 to 20 inches 20 to 40 inches 40 to 60 inches 60 inches+Douglas-fir 10 17 8 7 2Westernhemlock 23 33 8 1 0115
- Page 80 and 81: Sacramento River Canyon now provide
- Page 82 and 83: On January 11, 1980, there was an a
- Page 84 and 85: vation Strategy for the Northern Sp
- Page 86 and 87: transfer of one area to the Grand R
- Page 88 and 89: The BLM Spokane (Washington) Distri
- Page 90 and 91: 3. National Park ServiceThe followi
- Page 92 and 93: The results of a consultation are s
- Page 94 and 95: - Since landowners already face cut
- Page 96 and 97: 4. Cumulative Effects AssessmentThe
- Page 98 and 99: Assessment, Planning, and Monitorin
- Page 100 and 101: Spotted owl nesting sites and activ
- Page 102 and 103: Coastal Oregon Productivity Enhance
- Page 104 and 105: including wildlife. In other cases,
- Page 106 and 107: Currently, the Yakima Indian Nation
- Page 108 and 109: where timber harvest is limited to
- Page 111 and 112: III.A. Recovery Objective and Delis
- Page 113: 4. The population is unlikely to ne
- Page 116 and 117: Needs of other species should be co
- Page 118 and 119: years. The strategy of managing for
- Page 120 and 121: 't0
- Page 122 and 123: Finally, the plan recommends mainta
- Page 124 and 125: A total of 1,181 pairs of owls has
- Page 126 and 127: DKnown owlsin the OregonprovincesKn
- Page 128 and 129: mologists, and representatives of o
- Page 132 and 133: After 100 years residual snags will
- Page 134 and 135: 2. Fuelwood Gathering. If allowed,
- Page 136 and 137: The application of prescriptions A,
- Page 138 and 139: owls. (Refer to tables in section I
- Page 140 and 141: PRESCRIPTION D -RETAIN OWLS IN MANA
- Page 142 and 143: 126
- Page 144 and 145: DCA Management Plans.The recovery p
- Page 146 and 147: Endangered Species Act) or through
- Page 148 and 149: 6. Costs to landowners should be re
- Page 150 and 151: The real or perceived disincentives
- Page 152 and 153: authority of the public body to ent
- Page 154 and 155: * Use the recovery plan's recommend
- Page 156 and 157: 140
- Page 158 and 159: Supplemental pair areas - Habitat d
- Page 160 and 161: Numbers of owls currently are estim
- Page 162 and 163: Biological goals and implementation
- Page 164 and 165: ning. Also, several unsurveyed area
- Page 166 and 167: Owl pairsKnown owlsin the province3
- Page 168 and 169: - Initiate long-range planning effo
- Page 170 and 171: Table 3.8. Summary comments on the
- Page 172 and 173: from nonfederal lands are needed to
- Page 174 and 175: Eastern Washington Cascades Provinc
- Page 176 and 177: (Owl pairs140 - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- Page 178 and 179: habitat in DCA WD- 16. Approximatel
this prey species is an appropriate strategy <strong>for</strong> DCAs. There<strong>for</strong>e, snagslarger than 20-inch dbh will be retained.This guideline may need to be refined <strong>for</strong> application in some physiographicprovinces. However, retention of all stems larger than 20-inchdbh is likely to provide <strong>the</strong> highest probability of long-term retention ofsnags throughout <strong>the</strong> owl's range. Management planning in areas suchas nor<strong>the</strong>rn Cali<strong>for</strong>nia may require specific guidance <strong>for</strong> hardwood snagretention, and to provide habitat <strong>for</strong> woodrats, a prey species. In allareas, however, <strong>the</strong> primary focus should be on long-term planning.4. Coarse woody debris (CWD) biomass (i.e., snags and down logs) provideshabitat <strong>for</strong> organisms that are important food of several owl prey species,as well as having o<strong>the</strong>r habitat-enhancing characteristics. In <strong>the</strong> first 100years after a stand-replacing disturbance, <strong>the</strong> amount of CWD added by<strong>the</strong> new stand is not significant, so retaining remnant CWD from <strong>the</strong>previous stand during this time is important. Following a stand-replacingdisturbance, management will provide <strong>for</strong> CWD quantities in <strong>the</strong> newstand which, after 100 years, would be similar to amounts in naturallyregenerated stands at that age. As in <strong>the</strong> case of snags, province-levelspecifications must be provided <strong>for</strong> this guideline. Since decay rates andbiomass naturally remaining at 100 years undoubtedly will vary amongprovinces and <strong>for</strong>est types, <strong>the</strong> specifications also will vary.5. Some salvage that does not meet <strong>the</strong> preceding guidelines will be allowedwhen salvage is essential to reduce <strong>the</strong> risk of fire or insect damage tosuitable owl habitat. This circumstance is most likely to occur in <strong>the</strong>eastern Oregon and eastern Washington Cascades and Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Cascadesprovinces, and somewhat less likely in <strong>the</strong> Oregon and Cali<strong>for</strong>niaKlamath provinces. It is important to understand that some risk associatedwith fire and insects is acceptable because <strong>the</strong>y are natural <strong>for</strong>cesinfluencing <strong>for</strong>est development where owls occur. Consequently, salvageto reduce such risks should be minimal, and considered as an exceptionalpractice.6. Small-scale removal of snags and logs may be necessary to reducehazards to humans along roads and trails and in or adjacent to campgrounds.Where materials must be removed from <strong>the</strong> site, as in a campground,a salvage sale is appropriate. In o<strong>the</strong>r areas, such as alongroads, leaving material on site should be considered. Also, material willbe left where available CWD is inadequate.7. Where green trees, snags, and logs are present following disturbance, <strong>the</strong>above green tree and snag guidelines (discussed earlier in this section)will be applied first, and completely satisfied where possible. The biomassleft in snags can be credited toward <strong>the</strong> amount of CWD biomass neededto achieve management objectives.8. Since remnant CWD may be relatively small after disturbances in youngerstands, diameter and biomass retention guidelines should be consistentwith silvicultural programs designed to regenerate suitable owl habitat.9. Logs present on <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>est floor be<strong>for</strong>e a disturbance event provide habitatbenefits which are likely to continue. It seldom will be appropriate toremove <strong>the</strong>m. In addition, <strong>the</strong>se logs will not be credited toward objectives<strong>for</strong> CWD retention developed after a disturbance event.10. The CWD retained will approximate <strong>the</strong> species composition of <strong>the</strong>original stand, to help replicate preexisting suitable habitat conditions.114