Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT
Needs of other species should be considered.Secretary Lujan directed the Recovery Team to consider "effects on otherthreatened and endangered species and those species which might be listed inthe future." The Recovery Team attempted to identify these species and therequirements of a select group of priority species. Efforts then were made toensure that the recovery plan provided this protection to the maximum extentpractical without increasing the overall cost. The plan also contains additionalinformation on the status of these species. The Recovery Team believes thatlandowners and managers may want to consider these other species in aneffort to reduce the long-term costs of protecting species in these ecosystems.The plan should be responsive to new information.2. Biological PrinciplesAs new information is produced by the monitoring and research program, moreefficient ways to bring about recovery may be developed. New data mayindicate that DCAs need to be larger or smaller; modification of the monitoringprogram may be required; improved silvicultural methods may be demonstratedto create and maintain owl habitat, or for integrating timber productionwith owl protection; and new, more effective administrative procedures may bedevised. The Recovery Team wants to encourage the development and implementationof these improvements. Specific recommendations are included forrevising the plan periodically and for assuring that proposed modifications tothe plan are considered fully and implemented as appropriate.This recovery plan is based on biological principles that are accepted widely byconservation biologists. The application of these principles to northern spottedowls first was described in the Conservation Strategy of the Interagency ScientificCommittee (Thomas et al. 1990). The most important of these principlesare that 1) species are more secure from extinction if habitat and local populationsare distributed across their entire range, 2) providing for species in largehabitat blocks is superior to providing small blocks; and 3) movement ofindividuals throughout the landscape is vital to the maintenance of all localpopulations within the range. A summary of the reasons behind each of theseprinciples and their application to northern spotted owls follows.The risk of local or widespread extirpation of northernspotted owls will be reduced by managingfor owls acrosstheir entire range and the variety of ecological conditionswithin that range.Four primary reasons can be cited for the importance of maintaining the fullrange of the species. First, any significant range reduction most likely wouldreduce the total number of local populations in the species' metapopulation.The security of the metapopulation is related directly to the number of localpopulations. A reduction in local populations increases the risk of extinction forthe whole metapopulation. Second, a reduction in range also would reduce theoverall range of environments occupied by the species, making the species morevulnerable to environmental stochasticity. Habitats at different elevations, indifferent forest types, in different ownerships, and in different parts of the owl'sgeographic range may act as refugia for the species in the face of catastrophes,rapid environmental change, chronic degradation of habitat from causes suchas forest diseases, or unforseen changes in interactions among species. Populationsdistributed across the geographic and ecological conditions within therange provide a higher likelihood that the subspecies will survive such events.100
For these two reasons, Thomas et al. (1990) concluded that species welldistributedacross their range are less prone to extinction than species confinedto smaller portions of their range. Third, range reduction around thefringes of a species' geographic or elevational range could have serious consequencesbecause these areas are often the sites of the most rapid adaptationswithin a species. Eliminating the fringes of the range might reduce the evolutionarycapability of the species. Fourth, the elimination of the geographic orelevational fringe portions of a species' range might be considered unwise inthe face of possible widespread climatic changes, especially where the directionand magnitude of those changes are uncertain. For example, some scientistsbelieve that global warming could result in some local cooling points in thePacific Northwest rather than a universal warming effect (Smith 1990). If theclimate cooled, it could place increasing importance on the southern parts ofthe range and on low elevation habitats. If the climate warmed, it could placeincreasing importance on the northern extent of the range.Emphasis should be placed on managementfor clusters,or local population centers, of owls in large habitat blocksrather than for individual pairs.Empirical evidence and modeling show that clusters of 15 to 20 breeding pairshave much higher persistence rates than small, isolated clusters. Theseclusters, or local population centers, can be defined as groups of breeding owlswhere pairs have overlapping or nearly overlapping territories. The evidenceand rationale supporting this principle are described in detail in Thomas et al.(1990).One of the advantages of local population clusters is that they can provide for apopulation structure that can sustain itself for many generations. This contrastswith extremely small local populations, composed of two or fewer pairs,that are highly susceptible to local extinction (Diamond 1984). In order torealize this advantage, the local populations must be large enough to holdmultiple breeding pairs, and also support juveniles, subadults, and "floaters."Floaters are nonbreeding individuals without established territories. It isthought that they serve as ready replacements for birds that die or vacate theirterritories for other reasons (Thomas et al. 1990). This ready replacement ofbirds in breeding territories should help maintain the populations within thelocal population centers.Within each local population center, it is critical to provide for stable or improvinghabitat conditions. This will reverse the trend of increasing fragmentationof habitat which has been experienced in most areas across the range. Fragmentationof habitat is associated with lowered spotted owl densities, decreasedproductivity of spotted owl populations (Bart and Forsman 1992),increasing susceptibility of forest stands to windthrow, decreasing success ofjuvenile dispersal, and possibly increased competition with barred owls andpredation by great horned owls (Thomas et al. 1990).For a strategy based on local populations to be successful, those local populationsmust be capable of acting as sources of surplus owls for the species'metapopulation. A source area is one that has a positive rate of populationincrease and is capable of contributing individuals to the metapopulation.Local populations might cease to act as sources if they are too small or if theyoccupy highly fragmented habitat (Thomas et al. 1990). It is important to notethat each local population does not have to act as a source each year. It isexpected that there will be some variation across populations and across years,and that a portion of the local populations would not act as sources in some101
- Page 66 and 67: were in suitable habitat condition.
- Page 68 and 69: Estimated acres of forest landbase:
- Page 70 and 71: owned and contain little suitable h
- Page 72 and 73: Vulnerability to Natural Disturbanc
- Page 74 and 75: Douglas-fir/hardwood types, the lat
- Page 76 and 77: miles from the contiguous populatio
- Page 78 and 79: In comparison, the southern part of
- Page 80 and 81: Sacramento River Canyon now provide
- Page 82 and 83: On January 11, 1980, there was an a
- Page 84 and 85: vation Strategy for the Northern Sp
- Page 86 and 87: transfer of one area to the Grand R
- Page 88 and 89: The BLM Spokane (Washington) Distri
- Page 90 and 91: 3. National Park ServiceThe followi
- Page 92 and 93: The results of a consultation are s
- Page 94 and 95: - Since landowners already face cut
- Page 96 and 97: 4. Cumulative Effects AssessmentThe
- Page 98 and 99: Assessment, Planning, and Monitorin
- Page 100 and 101: Spotted owl nesting sites and activ
- Page 102 and 103: Coastal Oregon Productivity Enhance
- Page 104 and 105: including wildlife. In other cases,
- Page 106 and 107: Currently, the Yakima Indian Nation
- Page 108 and 109: where timber harvest is limited to
- Page 111 and 112: III.A. Recovery Objective and Delis
- Page 113: 4. The population is unlikely to ne
- Page 118 and 119: years. The strategy of managing for
- Page 120 and 121: 't0
- Page 122 and 123: Finally, the plan recommends mainta
- Page 124 and 125: A total of 1,181 pairs of owls has
- Page 126 and 127: DKnown owlsin the OregonprovincesKn
- Page 128 and 129: mologists, and representatives of o
- Page 130 and 131: this prey species is an appropriate
- Page 132 and 133: After 100 years residual snags will
- Page 134 and 135: 2. Fuelwood Gathering. If allowed,
- Page 136 and 137: The application of prescriptions A,
- Page 138 and 139: owls. (Refer to tables in section I
- Page 140 and 141: PRESCRIPTION D -RETAIN OWLS IN MANA
- Page 142 and 143: 126
- Page 144 and 145: DCA Management Plans.The recovery p
- Page 146 and 147: Endangered Species Act) or through
- Page 148 and 149: 6. Costs to landowners should be re
- Page 150 and 151: The real or perceived disincentives
- Page 152 and 153: authority of the public body to ent
- Page 154 and 155: * Use the recovery plan's recommend
- Page 156 and 157: 140
- Page 158 and 159: Supplemental pair areas - Habitat d
- Page 160 and 161: Numbers of owls currently are estim
- Page 162 and 163: Biological goals and implementation
- Page 164 and 165: ning. Also, several unsurveyed area
Needs of o<strong>the</strong>r species should be considered.Secretary Lujan directed <strong>the</strong> <strong>Recovery</strong> Team to consider "effects on o<strong>the</strong>rthreatened and endangered species and those species which might be listed in<strong>the</strong> future." The <strong>Recovery</strong> Team attempted to identify <strong>the</strong>se species and <strong>the</strong>requirements of a select group of priority species. Ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>the</strong>n were made toensure that <strong>the</strong> recovery plan provided this protection to <strong>the</strong> maximum extentpractical without increasing <strong>the</strong> overall cost. The plan also contains additionalin<strong>for</strong>mation on <strong>the</strong> status of <strong>the</strong>se species. The <strong>Recovery</strong> Team believes thatlandowners and managers may want to consider <strong>the</strong>se o<strong>the</strong>r species in anef<strong>for</strong>t to reduce <strong>the</strong> long-term costs of protecting species in <strong>the</strong>se ecosystems.The plan should be responsive to new in<strong>for</strong>mation.2. Biological PrinciplesAs new in<strong>for</strong>mation is produced by <strong>the</strong> monitoring and research program, moreefficient ways to bring about recovery may be developed. New data mayindicate that DCAs need to be larger or smaller; modification of <strong>the</strong> monitoringprogram may be required; improved silvicultural methods may be demonstratedto create and maintain owl habitat, or <strong>for</strong> integrating timber productionwith owl protection; and new, more effective administrative procedures may bedevised. The <strong>Recovery</strong> Team wants to encourage <strong>the</strong> development and implementationof <strong>the</strong>se improvements. Specific recommendations are included <strong>for</strong>revising <strong>the</strong> plan periodically and <strong>for</strong> assuring that proposed modifications to<strong>the</strong> plan are considered fully and implemented as appropriate.This recovery plan is based on biological principles that are accepted widely byconservation biologists. The application of <strong>the</strong>se principles to nor<strong>the</strong>rn spottedowls first was described in <strong>the</strong> Conservation Strategy of <strong>the</strong> Interagency ScientificCommittee (Thomas et al. 1990). The most important of <strong>the</strong>se principlesare that 1) species are more secure from extinction if habitat and local populationsare distributed across <strong>the</strong>ir entire range, 2) providing <strong>for</strong> species in largehabitat blocks is superior to providing small blocks; and 3) movement ofindividuals throughout <strong>the</strong> landscape is vital to <strong>the</strong> maintenance of all localpopulations within <strong>the</strong> range. A summary of <strong>the</strong> reasons behind each of <strong>the</strong>seprinciples and <strong>the</strong>ir application to nor<strong>the</strong>rn spotted owls follows.The risk of local or widespread extirpation of nor<strong>the</strong>rnspotted owls will be reduced by managing<strong>for</strong> owls across<strong>the</strong>ir entire range and <strong>the</strong> variety of ecological conditionswithin that range.Four primary reasons can be cited <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> importance of maintaining <strong>the</strong> fullrange of <strong>the</strong> species. First, any significant range reduction most likely wouldreduce <strong>the</strong> total number of local populations in <strong>the</strong> species' metapopulation.The security of <strong>the</strong> metapopulation is related directly to <strong>the</strong> number of localpopulations. A reduction in local populations increases <strong>the</strong> risk of extinction <strong>for</strong><strong>the</strong> whole metapopulation. Second, a reduction in range also would reduce <strong>the</strong>overall range of environments occupied by <strong>the</strong> species, making <strong>the</strong> species morevulnerable to environmental stochasticity. Habitats at different elevations, indifferent <strong>for</strong>est types, in different ownerships, and in different parts of <strong>the</strong> owl'sgeographic range may act as refugia <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> species in <strong>the</strong> face of catastrophes,rapid environmental change, chronic degradation of habitat from causes suchas <strong>for</strong>est diseases, or un<strong>for</strong>seen changes in interactions among species. Populationsdistributed across <strong>the</strong> geographic and ecological conditions within <strong>the</strong>range provide a higher likelihood that <strong>the</strong> subspecies will survive such events.100