10.07.2015 Views

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl - DRAFT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>the</strong>y may have under federal law. Several hundred permit applications wereaffected in some way during 1990 by Washington regulatory requirementsrelated to <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn spotted owl. The regulations also provide protection tonontimber resources, including wildlife habitat, within designated riparianareas.Washington Environmental Policy Act. This law is similar to <strong>the</strong> NationalEnvironmental Policy Act. Implementing regulations require environmentalanalysis and public review, and set substantive environmental goals <strong>for</strong> allagencies.Local Zoning and Land Use Control. Local government permits are required<strong>for</strong> land use conversion, clearing and grading, and building construction.Permits generally are subject to SEPA analysis.Wildlife Laws. Pursuant to Washington's wildlife laws, <strong>the</strong> state WildlifeCommission may by rule designate a species of wildlife as endangered. Huntingof or trafficking in endangered wildlife species is prohibited. The nor<strong>the</strong>rnspotted owl is listed as endangered under Washington law.Land ManagementState Lands-Federally Granted Trusts. These lands were granted toWashington by <strong>the</strong> federal government to be managed in trust <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> financialbenefit of schools and o<strong>the</strong>r legally designated beneficiaries. About 1.3 millionacres of <strong>for</strong>estland are currently in this ownership. Common law requires <strong>the</strong>state, acting through <strong>the</strong> Department of Natural Resources, to exercise <strong>the</strong>same prudence a private person would exercise in managing his or her ownland. Case law requires undivided loyalty to <strong>the</strong> trust beneficiaries. Forestedtrust lands are managed on a sustained-yield basis. Trust lands are subject to<strong>the</strong> same regulatory requirements as those of o<strong>the</strong>r landowners. Beyondregulatory requirements, wildlife habitat objectives are incorporated intomanagement, consistent with trust requirements.State Lands-Forest Board. State statute created this state ownership ofapproximately 620,000 acres. These lands, mostly second-growth, are dedicatedto perpetuate <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>est resource. Revenues from management benefitcounty junior taxing districts and <strong>the</strong> state general fund. Case law indicatesthat <strong>the</strong> state has a trust relationship to county beneficiaries.Commission on Old-Growth Alternatives. In June 1989, this broad-basedcitizens' commission made consensus recommendations to <strong>the</strong> Department ofNatural Resources on management of old-growth <strong>for</strong>est on state lands on <strong>the</strong>western Olympic Peninsula. Recommendations included a 15-year harvestdeferral on 15,000 acres of <strong>the</strong> most critical owl habitat, acquisition from <strong>the</strong>trusts of 3,000 acres of land with high ecological value, creation of a 260,000-acre experimental <strong>for</strong>est and a <strong>for</strong>est research center, and calculation of asustained-yield level <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>se lands distinct from o<strong>the</strong>r state lands. Theseproposals are in various stages of consideration and implementation.Industrial Lands. This is <strong>the</strong> largest nonfederal <strong>for</strong>estland ownership categoryin Washington, responsible <strong>for</strong> more than half of <strong>the</strong> total state timbersupply in recent years. Although managed to provide economic returns,industrial lands are subject to <strong>the</strong> state <strong>for</strong>est practices regulations describedearlier. In some cases, relatively large contiguous ownership blocks areconducive to effective voluntary management <strong>for</strong> some nontimber values,87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!