21.11.2012 Views

the IHS Ballast Water Guide - RWO Marine Water Technology

the IHS Ballast Water Guide - RWO Marine Water Technology

the IHS Ballast Water Guide - RWO Marine Water Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sponsored by <strong>IHS</strong> Fairplay Solutions <strong>Guide</strong> to <strong>Ballast</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Treatment Systems<br />

Sampling<br />

and port state control<br />

<strong>Ballast</strong> water sampling and analysis<br />

procedures and <strong>the</strong> implementation<br />

protocol for port state control (PSC) were<br />

re-examined and planned to be fi nalised<br />

at MEPC 63, which was held from 27<br />

February to 2 March. Two sets of draft<br />

guidance were submitted to <strong>the</strong> IMO<br />

Sub-Committee on Bulk Liquids and<br />

Gases (BLG).<br />

One draft covered guidance on sampling and<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r off ered advice on PSC issues. The<br />

result was a split between a group including<br />

<strong>the</strong> large fl ag states – including Panama and <strong>the</strong><br />

Bahamas – and an EU-led group.<br />

The ICS has highlighted <strong>the</strong> chaotic state of<br />

ballast water treatment rules after <strong>the</strong> IMO<br />

BLG Sub-Committee agreed to alterations in<br />

<strong>the</strong> draft ballast water sampling and analysis<br />

guidelines that will be used by PSC.<br />

Effect of BWT on coatings<br />

This might be damaging to shipowners<br />

were it to be adopted by IMO contrary to what<br />

had previously been agreed by <strong>the</strong> MEPC.<br />

Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> ICS issued a strong statement<br />

at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> BLG meeting in January<br />

about <strong>the</strong> direction that had been taken. Now,<br />

with <strong>the</strong> support of many fl ag states, <strong>the</strong> draft<br />

guidelines will be reconsidered.<br />

This means, however, that <strong>the</strong> guidelines<br />

associated with sampling and analysis will<br />

not be approved until 2013 at <strong>the</strong> earliest,<br />

which is expected to delay <strong>the</strong> additional<br />

ratifi cations needed to bring <strong>the</strong> IMO<br />

<strong>Ballast</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Management Convention<br />

into force. The delay creates o<strong>the</strong>r problems<br />

for shipowners, because of <strong>the</strong> fi xed dates<br />

by which existing ships have to install <strong>the</strong><br />

potentially expensive treatment equipment<br />

required by <strong>the</strong> convention.<br />

A potential consequence of ballast water treatment – at least for those systems that make use of an<br />

active substance – is <strong>the</strong> potential for damage to be caused to <strong>the</strong> wider ballast system. Coatings suppliers<br />

have expressed concern about <strong>the</strong> effect of treated water on paint and <strong>the</strong> risk of corrosion of ballast<br />

water tanks.<br />

The confl ict has arisen because <strong>the</strong> paint, as <strong>the</strong> last layer on, is traditionally considered accountable<br />

for <strong>the</strong> effect on <strong>the</strong> tank and <strong>the</strong> water it holds. Coating manufacturers argue that BWT systems<br />

appeared after coatings were developed, so <strong>the</strong> onus is on <strong>the</strong> system-makers to test <strong>the</strong>ir products<br />

against existing coatings. With no offi cial regulatory decision, <strong>the</strong> dispute rumbles on, but it is something<br />

that owners selecting ei<strong>the</strong>r a tank coating or a ballast water treatment system should consider before<br />

coming to a fi nal decision.<br />

One of <strong>the</strong> main elements of a ballast system is its piping. Seawater is highly corrosive and pipes often<br />

need repair or replacement. Some new suppliers are promoting <strong>the</strong> advantages of composites over steel<br />

and <strong>the</strong>re do appear to be more benefi ts than downsides to <strong>the</strong> idea. Claimed advantages include lightness,<br />

absence of corrosion and <strong>the</strong>ir potential for use in repairing damage to existing steel systems.<br />

© <strong>IHS</strong> Global Limited 2012 43<br />

042_043_BW1204.indd 43 21/03/2012 18:49:56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!