Conceptual Site Model - Argonne National Laboratory

Conceptual Site Model - Argonne National Laboratory Conceptual Site Model - Argonne National Laboratory

10.07.2015 Views

WVDP Phase 1 CSAPof 15 cm and analyzed for Cs-137 and Sr-90 via fast-turnaround to confirm their absence, andthen the samples will submitted for off-site analysis for all 18 ROIs. Based on the assumption thatthe analyses confirm background conditions for these soils, the scan data from this area would beused as a point of comparison for scan data collected as part of remedial action support elsewherein the excavations.When excavations have reached their design extent, a second round of remedial support surveyswill be conducted. The second round will begin with complete excavation surface coverage(floors and sloped walls) by using a FIDLER detector. If scan results for any portion of theexcavations indicate evidence of measurable impacts, either additional excavation may take placeor the area of interest will be biased sampled to a depth of 15 cm and submitted for fast turnaroundfor analyses of Cs-137 and Sr-90. If the results indicate soil activity concentrationsexceeding subsurface CG w standards, excavation in that area will continue until scans/samplingindicate the standards have been achieved or the excavation has reached its physical limits.In the case of sloped walls within the WMA 1 or 2 excavations, contamination at levels ofpotential concern may be encountered that extends beyond the practicable limits of excavation,and potentially beyond the sheet pile walls. In these instances soil sampling from the slopedsurface will take place to document the contamination status of soils adjacent to sheet pilingwithin the sloped surface. Additional subsurface soil sampling may take place outside the sheetpiling to determine and document the lateral extent of the observed contamination as part ofPhase 1 activities.If scanning of the exposed excavation surface does not indicate evidence of elevated activity thatwould be a concern and the excavation has reached its design extent, then remedial action surveysoil sampling will take place. Soil samples will be collected systematically on a random-starttriangular grid across the excavation surface (floor and sloped walls) to a depth of 15 cm at adensity of one sample per 200 m 2 . In the case of WMA 1, this will result in approximately 60samples collected from the floor and walls of the excavation. In the case of WMA 2, this willresult in approximately 90 samples from the excavation floor and walls. These samples will besubmitted for quick-turnaround analysis of Sr-90. The results from these samples will be used, inconjunction with the scan information, to determine whether additional excavation is necessary orthe excavation face is ready for FSS data collection following the FSSP protocols. If the latter, theSr-90 sample results will be used to fine-tune FSS sample numbers by providing an estimate ofRev. 1 56

WVDP Phase 1 CSAPthe lower bound of the gray region (LBGR) and variability observed. If contamination above thecleanup standards is found in the sloped soil walls of the excavation in WMA 1, the impermeablesheet piling will limit the extent to which this contamination can be pursued laterally.In the case of WMA 1, approximately 476 foundation pilings will be present that extend into thetill (and in some cases through the till). According to the Phase 1 DP, these pilings will be cut justbelow the final excavation surface. If scans identify elevated activity of potential CG exceedancesin the till material adjacent to the pilings, excavation will continue until CG exceedance concernsare no longer present. Biased soil samples with rapid Sr-90 turnaround results may be used tofurther interpret scan readings for these piles. Remedial action surveys combined with quickturnaroundSr-90 sample results will be used to segregate pilings into two groups: those thatclearly have contamination present in soils above them and those that do not. These groupingswill be used to implement Phase 1 FSS data collection protocols as described in the FSSP.7.2 HLW Transfer Trench Contamination StatusThe planned Phase 1 decommissioning activities in WMA 3 will remove the HLW transfer linesand leave behind the concrete HLW transfer trench. The assumption is that the exterior of thetrench has not been affected. Remedial action surveys will be conducted inside the empty HLWtransfer trench to establish the radiological status of the trench after removal of the transfer line.The trench is approximately 500 ft long, 6 to 20 ft wide, with a height of 6 to 9 ft.Before data collection is initiated within the trench, radiological safety surveys conducted duringthe removal of the transfer lines will be reviewed to determine whether there is any immediateevidence of elevated areas.Data collection for the trench will include two types of scans: one using an appropriately shieldedNaI detector to evaluate the potential for volumetric contamination within the concrete, and theother with a zinc sulfide (ZnS) scintillation or gas proportional detector to evaluate for thepresence of surface beta contamination. In the case of an NaI detector, shielding may be requiredto limit the field of view of the detector to the area of concrete of interest and to mitigate potentialshine effects from other portions of the trench. In both cases, surveys will be conducted toprovide 100% coverage of the trench floor and 25% coverage of the trench sides. If appropriatecoordinate/measurement logging systems are combined with the detectors, digitally recordedRev. 1 57

WVDP Phase 1 CSAPof 15 cm and analyzed for Cs-137 and Sr-90 via fast-turnaround to confirm their absence, andthen the samples will submitted for off-site analysis for all 18 ROIs. Based on the assumption thatthe analyses confirm background conditions for these soils, the scan data from this area would beused as a point of comparison for scan data collected as part of remedial action support elsewherein the excavations.When excavations have reached their design extent, a second round of remedial support surveyswill be conducted. The second round will begin with complete excavation surface coverage(floors and sloped walls) by using a FIDLER detector. If scan results for any portion of theexcavations indicate evidence of measurable impacts, either additional excavation may take placeor the area of interest will be biased sampled to a depth of 15 cm and submitted for fast turnaroundfor analyses of Cs-137 and Sr-90. If the results indicate soil activity concentrationsexceeding subsurface CG w standards, excavation in that area will continue until scans/samplingindicate the standards have been achieved or the excavation has reached its physical limits.In the case of sloped walls within the WMA 1 or 2 excavations, contamination at levels ofpotential concern may be encountered that extends beyond the practicable limits of excavation,and potentially beyond the sheet pile walls. In these instances soil sampling from the slopedsurface will take place to document the contamination status of soils adjacent to sheet pilingwithin the sloped surface. Additional subsurface soil sampling may take place outside the sheetpiling to determine and document the lateral extent of the observed contamination as part ofPhase 1 activities.If scanning of the exposed excavation surface does not indicate evidence of elevated activity thatwould be a concern and the excavation has reached its design extent, then remedial action surveysoil sampling will take place. Soil samples will be collected systematically on a random-starttriangular grid across the excavation surface (floor and sloped walls) to a depth of 15 cm at adensity of one sample per 200 m 2 . In the case of WMA 1, this will result in approximately 60samples collected from the floor and walls of the excavation. In the case of WMA 2, this willresult in approximately 90 samples from the excavation floor and walls. These samples will besubmitted for quick-turnaround analysis of Sr-90. The results from these samples will be used, inconjunction with the scan information, to determine whether additional excavation is necessary orthe excavation face is ready for FSS data collection following the FSSP protocols. If the latter, theSr-90 sample results will be used to fine-tune FSS sample numbers by providing an estimate ofRev. 1 56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!