Conceptual Site Model - Argonne National Laboratory
Conceptual Site Model - Argonne National Laboratory Conceptual Site Model - Argonne National Laboratory
WVDP Phase 1 CSAPThe limited Cs-137 data that are available are, in general, consistent with the historicaldirect reading data for this area. The same spatial pattern observed in direct readings forErdman Brook is replicated in sediment samples, with the highest Cs-137 activityconcentrations occurring at the northern fence line and coincident with the highest directreadings. Erdman Brook sediment Cs-137 activity concentrations drop as one moves upthe stream channel, mirroring the direct exposure readings.• A hot spot was identified in 1990 about 75 feet below the confluence of Erdman Brookand Franks Creek. As described in the footnote on page 4-49 of the Phase 1 DP, in 1990,a sample from a hot spot in Erdman Brook that measured 3000 μR/h during the groundlevelsurvey showed 0.01 μCi/g (10,000 pCi/g) Cs-137. This was a screening analysisthat may have been performed on a wet sample; it was not validated. This area oflocalized contamination was described as about six inches by six inches located onemeter from the edge of the water. Limited investigation indicated that the contaminationextended more than seven inches below the streambed surface (WVDP-EIS-007,Appendix C).• There are sixteen historical groundwater sampling locations within WMA 12 South(Figure J.11) that have historical sample results within ELIMS. These include eight alongthe WMA 2 border on the north side of WMA 12 South, and another six along the WMA7/WMA 8 border on the south side of WMA 12 South. The detection limits for Sr-90 andtritium varied widely among ELIMS samples. 10 pCi/L and 500 pCi/L were selected asthresholds for Sr-90 and tritium, respectively, because based on ELIMS data resultsabove these activity concentrations were consistently above method detection limits andso indicative of contamination impacts rather than simply measurement error.All of the shallow groundwater sampling locations along the WMA 2 boundary showtritium impacts, and most show low levels of Sr-90 as well (although not all wereanalyzed for Sr-90). In general, Sr-90 activity concentrations increase as one moves eastalong the border. Likely sources of this contamination are the lagoons and the NorthPlateau Groundwater Plume. Along the southern boundary, one well, WNNDADR, hadelevated Sr-90 impacts. Shallow groundwater movement within WMA 12 South is likelycontrolled by surface topography and Franks Creek and Erdman Brook. In general oneRev. 1 J-6
WVDP Phase 1 CSAPwould expect groundwater to move from the northern and southern boundaries towardsthe center of the WMA, and from west to east.J.6 Planned Phase 1 DP ActivitiesThere are no planned Phase 1 decommissioning activities for WMA 12 South.J.7 Conceptual Site ModelBased on the available information, the conceptual site model (CSM) for WMA 12 South is asfollows. No environmental releases of contamination within WMA 12 South are believed to haveoccurred. However, environmental media within WMA 12 South have been affected to somedegree by releases elsewhere at the WVDP site. This has resulted in surface soil contaminationfor at least portions of WMA 12 South (as evidenced by historical direct gamma surveys andlimited soil samples), potential subsurface contamination along the northeastern boundary ofWMA 12 South along WMA 2, and also in more significant streambed sediment contaminationresulting in releases of contaminated water from the Lagoon 3 discharge weir. In the case of thelatter, Erdman Brook has the bulk of these impacts. The impacts increase as one movesdownstream to the WVDP fence line, likely due to historical releases from WMA 2.Contamination in stream sediments is significant enough that eastern portions of Erdman Brookhave been designated radiological control areas by WVDP (see Figure J.1)In addition, historical activities within WMA 7 may have led to the release of contaminated soilsinto drainage features that crossed into WMA 12 South. The radiological control area defined forWMA 7 does currently extend into WMA 12 South (see Figure J.1).Because there have not been significant historical soil disturbance activities for the majority ofWMA 12 South, subsurface soil contamination is not expected to be present in most of the area.The exceptions to this is an area immediately adjacent to WMA 2 that appears to have been apush-out area active in 1960s, and that exhibited elevated gamma readings in 1990-1991. Anysoil contamination present is expected to be limited to surface soils (i.e., top one meter of soils)with the possible exception of soils immediately adjacent to WMA 2 along the historical wastestorage lagoons. Also, within WMA 2, Lagoons 2 and 3 are unlined. Contaminated groundwatermay have migrated through the subsurface with discharge via seeps to Erdman Brook, potentiallyRev. 1 J-7
- Page 422 and 423: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure H.5 WMA 9 A
- Page 424 and 425: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure H.7 WMA 9 A
- Page 426 and 427: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure H.9 WMA 9 A
- Page 428 and 429: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure H.11 WMA 9
- Page 430 and 431: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure H.13 Histor
- Page 432 and 433: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure H.15 WMA 9
- Page 434 and 435: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPA steel security f
- Page 436 and 437: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure I.4 shows W
- Page 438 and 439: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPshine from facilit
- Page 440 and 441: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPI.7 Conceptual Sit
- Page 442 and 443: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPA complete (100%)
- Page 444 and 445: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPgross activity lev
- Page 446 and 447: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• If a sample in
- Page 448 and 449: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPI.9.8Required Labo
- Page 450 and 451: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPTable I.1 Historic
- Page 452 and 453: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPContractor Fab Sho
- Page 454 and 455: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure I.3 WMA 10
- Page 456 and 457: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure I.5 WMA 10
- Page 458 and 459: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure I.7 WMA 10
- Page 460 and 461: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure I.9 WMA 10
- Page 462 and 463: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure I.11 WMA 10
- Page 464 and 465: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure I.13 WMA 10
- Page 466 and 467: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure I.15 Initia
- Page 468 and 469: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPBrook northwest of
- Page 470 and 471: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• Lagoon 3 (in W
- Page 474 and 475: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPcontaminating subs
- Page 476 and 477: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPdistribution of su
- Page 478 and 479: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPoIf GWS results in
- Page 480 and 481: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPon historical info
- Page 482 and 483: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPA select portion o
- Page 484 and 485: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPTable J.1 Historic
- Page 486 and 487: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure J.1 WMA 12
- Page 488 and 489: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure J.3 WMA 12
- Page 490 and 491: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure J.5 1982 WM
- Page 492 and 493: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPWMA 12 NorthWMA 12
- Page 494 and 495: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure J.9 WMA 12
- Page 496 and 497: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure J.11 WMA 12
- Page 498 and 499: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure J.13 WMA 12
- Page 500 and 501: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPlater in this sect
- Page 502 and 503: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• Direct measure
- Page 504 and 505: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPK.9.2 Surface Soil
- Page 506 and 507: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPpurpose is to reso
- Page 508 and 509: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• If a portion o
- Page 510 and 511: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure K.1 WMA 12
- Page 512 and 513: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure K.3 WMA 12
- Page 514 and 515: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure K.5 WMA 12
- Page 516 and 517: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure K.7 WMA 12
- Page 518 and 519: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure K.9 Initial
WVDP Phase 1 CSAPThe limited Cs-137 data that are available are, in general, consistent with the historicaldirect reading data for this area. The same spatial pattern observed in direct readings forErdman Brook is replicated in sediment samples, with the highest Cs-137 activityconcentrations occurring at the northern fence line and coincident with the highest directreadings. Erdman Brook sediment Cs-137 activity concentrations drop as one moves upthe stream channel, mirroring the direct exposure readings.• A hot spot was identified in 1990 about 75 feet below the confluence of Erdman Brookand Franks Creek. As described in the footnote on page 4-49 of the Phase 1 DP, in 1990,a sample from a hot spot in Erdman Brook that measured 3000 μR/h during the groundlevelsurvey showed 0.01 μCi/g (10,000 pCi/g) Cs-137. This was a screening analysisthat may have been performed on a wet sample; it was not validated. This area oflocalized contamination was described as about six inches by six inches located onemeter from the edge of the water. Limited investigation indicated that the contaminationextended more than seven inches below the streambed surface (WVDP-EIS-007,Appendix C).• There are sixteen historical groundwater sampling locations within WMA 12 South(Figure J.11) that have historical sample results within ELIMS. These include eight alongthe WMA 2 border on the north side of WMA 12 South, and another six along the WMA7/WMA 8 border on the south side of WMA 12 South. The detection limits for Sr-90 andtritium varied widely among ELIMS samples. 10 pCi/L and 500 pCi/L were selected asthresholds for Sr-90 and tritium, respectively, because based on ELIMS data resultsabove these activity concentrations were consistently above method detection limits andso indicative of contamination impacts rather than simply measurement error.All of the shallow groundwater sampling locations along the WMA 2 boundary showtritium impacts, and most show low levels of Sr-90 as well (although not all wereanalyzed for Sr-90). In general, Sr-90 activity concentrations increase as one moves eastalong the border. Likely sources of this contamination are the lagoons and the NorthPlateau Groundwater Plume. Along the southern boundary, one well, WNNDADR, hadelevated Sr-90 impacts. Shallow groundwater movement within WMA 12 South is likelycontrolled by surface topography and Franks Creek and Erdman Brook. In general oneRev. 1 J-6