Conceptual Site Model - Argonne National Laboratory
Conceptual Site Model - Argonne National Laboratory Conceptual Site Model - Argonne National Laboratory
WVDP Phase 1 CSAPG.4.3 Drainage Area ReleasesPotentially Affected Media: surface soil, subsurface soil, sediment, groundwaterPotentially Affected WMAs: 7, 8A drainage area located between the SDA and the NDA is believed to contain contaminated soil.Presumably, this swale has been contaminated from spills during waste burial operations by NFS,and also during leachate control activities after SDA closure.During the NDA tank removal and subsurface control period in the 1980s and 1990s, the swalearea was re-contoured to prevent erosion. An unknown amount of low-level radioactivecontamination remains in that area, evidenced by continuing elevated radioactive contaminantindicators in surface water immediately downstream. The swale area is approximately 30 feetwide and runs approximately 300 feet north, along the drainage from the NDA Hardstand. Basedupon observations during radiation surveys in 1982, the contamination appeared to havepermeated porous fill in the swale channel. Gamma readings in that area were five to seven timesbackground, not inconsistent with observed downstream gross beta contamination. Surface soilcontamination is still occasionally noted in that area.G.5 Existing DataExisting data sets for this area include:• Extensive historical record searches and modeling have been used to determine theactivity contents of the NDA (WVNSCO 1982).• In 1982 static direct exposure readings were collected across the WVDP premises(WVNSCO 1992). Only a small portion of WMA 7 was covered by these measurementson a 10-m grid. Figure G.12 shows these results color-coded by the exposure readingsencountered, with the data overlain on a 1977 aerial photograph. The data indicateelevated surface contamination associated with the two WMA 7 drainage features.Rev. 1 G-8
WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• In 1990 and 1991 a second static direct exposure measurement program was conductedacross the WVDP premises (WVNSCO 1992). In the case of WMA 7, this effortprovided systematic coverage of its entire area on a 10-m grid. This data collection useddifferent instrumentation and protocols than the 1982 study, so the results are notquantitatively comparable. Figure G.13 shows these results overlain on a 1995 aerialphotograph.• There are very little soil sampling data for WMA 7 available within ELIMS. In 1993 twosurface samples were collected and two soil cores were obtained. Figure G.14 shows theCs-137 and Sr-90 results for surface samples from these locations. The locations in thenortheastern corner showed Cs-137 and Sr-90 impacts. None of the samples were inlocations where one would expect to see the highest levels of impacts, based on thehistorical gamma measurements. Table G.1 identifies the number of locations analyzedfor each of the 18 primary radionuclides of interest.• There is a fair amount of historical groundwater sampling data available for WMA 7within ELIMS. Figure G.15 shows groundwater sampling locations color-coded byhistorical Sr-90 results. Figure G.16 shows the same for tritium results. In both cases thevarious wells displayed are screened in different geological units. The detection limits forSr-90 and tritium varied widely among ELIMS samples. 10 pCi/L and 500 pCi/L wereselected as thresholds for Sr-90 and tritium, respectively, because based on ELIMS dataresults above these activity concentrations were consistently above method detectionlimits and so indicative of contamination impacts rather than simply measurement error.As is evident from these two figures, there have been groundwater impacts in the vicinityof WMA 7, particularly to the north and northwest. Contaminated groundwater in thisarea is shallow and likely discharges via wetlands, ditches, and seeps to Erdman Brook,which runs along the north edge of WMA 7 and is fed by two drainage featuresoriginating within WMA 7.G.6 Planned Phase 1 DP ActivitiesThe remaining gravel pad associated with the NDA Hardstand will be removed along with the toptwo feet of soil (DOE 2009 Sections 3.1 and 7.8).Rev. 1 G-9
- Page 324 and 325: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure E.15 WMA 5
- Page 326 and 327: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure E.17 WMA 5
- Page 328 and 329: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPNew Cooling Tower.
- Page 330 and 331: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPPlateau although t
- Page 332 and 333: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPF.4.2North Plateau
- Page 334 and 335: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPof the Process Bui
- Page 336 and 337: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPThe New Cooling To
- Page 338 and 339: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• Verify Absence
- Page 340 and 341: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• CG w Sampling.
- Page 342 and 343: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• A minimum of t
- Page 344 and 345: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPand analyzed from
- Page 346 and 347: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPcontamination may
- Page 348 and 349: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPF.10 ReferencesDOE
- Page 350 and 351: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPTable F.2 Sample N
- Page 352 and 353: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure F.2 WMA 6 w
- Page 354 and 355: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure F.4 WMA 6 A
- Page 356 and 357: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure F.6 WMA 6 A
- Page 358 and 359: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure F.8 WMA 6 A
- Page 360 and 361: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure F.10 WMA 6
- Page 362 and 363: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPGP10208BH-19A137Cs
- Page 364 and 365: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure F.14 WMA 6
- Page 366 and 367: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure F.16 WMA 6
- Page 368 and 369: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPNFS Shallow Specia
- Page 370 and 371: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPLiquid that collec
- Page 372 and 373: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPeastern ends of th
- Page 376 and 377: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPPhase 1 will not a
- Page 378 and 379: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPG.9.3 Surface Soil
- Page 380 and 381: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPoIf any 0-15 cm in
- Page 382 and 383: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• Three location
- Page 384 and 385: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• Backfill assoc
- Page 386 and 387: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPTable G.2 Sample N
- Page 388 and 389: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure G.2 WMA 7 w
- Page 390 and 391: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure G.4 Subsurf
- Page 392 and 393: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure G.6 WMA 7 A
- Page 394 and 395: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure G.8 WMA 7 A
- Page 396 and 397: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure G.10 WMA 7
- Page 398 and 399: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure G.12 WMA 7
- Page 400 and 401: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPSS-15137Cs: 4.7 pC
- Page 402 and 403: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure G.16 WMA 7
- Page 404 and 405: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPThis page intentio
- Page 406 and 407: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPcompleted in 1990.
- Page 408 and 409: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• In 1990 and 19
- Page 410 and 411: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPH.9.1 Gamma Walkov
- Page 412 and 413: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPdepth interval, an
- Page 414 and 415: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPA select portion o
- Page 416 and 417: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPTable H.1 Historic
- Page 418 and 419: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPEmpty Waste Contai
- Page 420 and 421: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure H.3 WMA 9 A
- Page 422 and 423: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure H.5 WMA 9 A
WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• In 1990 and 1991 a second static direct exposure measurement program was conductedacross the WVDP premises (WVNSCO 1992). In the case of WMA 7, this effortprovided systematic coverage of its entire area on a 10-m grid. This data collection useddifferent instrumentation and protocols than the 1982 study, so the results are notquantitatively comparable. Figure G.13 shows these results overlain on a 1995 aerialphotograph.• There are very little soil sampling data for WMA 7 available within ELIMS. In 1993 twosurface samples were collected and two soil cores were obtained. Figure G.14 shows theCs-137 and Sr-90 results for surface samples from these locations. The locations in thenortheastern corner showed Cs-137 and Sr-90 impacts. None of the samples were inlocations where one would expect to see the highest levels of impacts, based on thehistorical gamma measurements. Table G.1 identifies the number of locations analyzedfor each of the 18 primary radionuclides of interest.• There is a fair amount of historical groundwater sampling data available for WMA 7within ELIMS. Figure G.15 shows groundwater sampling locations color-coded byhistorical Sr-90 results. Figure G.16 shows the same for tritium results. In both cases thevarious wells displayed are screened in different geological units. The detection limits forSr-90 and tritium varied widely among ELIMS samples. 10 pCi/L and 500 pCi/L wereselected as thresholds for Sr-90 and tritium, respectively, because based on ELIMS dataresults above these activity concentrations were consistently above method detectionlimits and so indicative of contamination impacts rather than simply measurement error.As is evident from these two figures, there have been groundwater impacts in the vicinityof WMA 7, particularly to the north and northwest. Contaminated groundwater in thisarea is shallow and likely discharges via wetlands, ditches, and seeps to Erdman Brook,which runs along the north edge of WMA 7 and is fed by two drainage featuresoriginating within WMA 7.G.6 Planned Phase 1 DP ActivitiesThe remaining gravel pad associated with the NDA Hardstand will be removed along with the toptwo feet of soil (DOE 2009 Sections 3.1 and 7.8).Rev. 1 G-9