Conceptual Site Model - Argonne National Laboratory
Conceptual Site Model - Argonne National Laboratory Conceptual Site Model - Argonne National Laboratory
WVDP Phase 1 CSAPThe New Cooling Tower will be removed down to its underground structure prior to the initiationof Phase 1 decommissioning activities.The Sewage Treatment Plant, the South Waste Tank Farm Test Tower, the two DemineralizerSludge Ponds, the Equalization Basin, the Equalization Tank, and the remaining concrete floorslabs, foundations, and hardstands will be removed.The Phase 1 work does not include the Rail Spur.F.7 Conceptual Site ModelWMA 6 potentially has impacts from a variety of releases. Some of these are surface, and someare subsurface. In addition, surface soil reworking in specific areas of WMA 6 has possiblyresulted in subsurface soil contamination. Specifically:• WMA 6 surface soils were likely affected by the 1968 airborne releases of radioactivityfrom the Process Building stack in WMA 1. These impacts would have originally beengreatest proximal to the Process Building and decreased as one moved south in WMA 6.Since 1968, however, there has been significant surface soil reworking in the northernportion of WMA 6. These activities could have removed contaminated soil layers, buriedthose layers under clean backfill, and/or redistributed/mixed contamination in surfacesoils.• Activities and buried infrastructure associated with the Old Sewage Treatment Facilityare known to have resulted in significant soil contamination that likely remains and thatmay be buried. The exact location of these infrastructure footprints is currently unknown.• The original old sewage treatment plant discharge channel that traversed the centralportion of WMA 6 was contaminated and then buried with clean soil. Subsurface soilcontamination likely remains associated with that original footprint. There are indicationsthat there may low level groundwater impacts associated with this contamination as well.Rev. 1 F-10
WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• Subsurface releases from the Process Building have impacted subsurface soils andgroundwater in WMA 6 along the WMA 1 boundary. The lateral extent of these impactsis currently unknown.• GPBG0408, a “background” soil bore completed adjacent to the WMA 6 boundarywithin WMA 10 just south of the New Warehouse and the Sewage Treatment Plantencountered tritium soil contamination at a depth of approximately five feet. While theexact source is unknown and tritium was the only radionuclide above background, it doesraise potential subsurface concerns for this area, assuming that the original release pointwas within WMA 6 and not WMA 10. The cluster of wells directly south of the SewageTreatment Plant showed some indications of elevated gross beta and tritium activityabove background levels in the 1990s. The soils and groundwater data suggest that thereis the potential for very low level impacts of soils/groundwater in this vicinity.• Sediments within the Demineralizer Sludge Ponds are known to be contaminated,although the depth of contamination is not known.• There is evidence of low levels of contamination in the sediments for the ditch thatcurrently drains WMA 10 in a southeasterly fashion along the Rail Spur beforeconnecting with Erdman Brook.Because the Old Warehouse pre-dates the 1968 airborne releases of radioactivity from theProcess Building stack, the assumption is that soils beneath the Old Warehouse slab are unimpacted.Figure F.15 shows the current Conceptual Site Model (CSM) for WMA 6 surface soils. FigureF.16 shows the same for soils deeper than 1 m. Particularly for subsurface soils, the CSM is basedon very little data and is primarily conjecture at this stage. Figures F.15 and F.16 also show thefootprints of the planned deep excavations for WMA 1 and WMA 2. Note that the plannedexcavations for WMA 1 and WMA 2 extend into portions of the northern part of WMA 6.F.8 WMA 6-Specific Characterization Goals• Evaluate Appropriateness of the Current List of Radionuclides of Interest (ROI)Rev. 1 F-11
- Page 286 and 287: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure D.16 Initia
- Page 288 and 289: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPcoat, application
- Page 290 and 291: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPWMA 5 is underlain
- Page 292 and 293: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFinally, other rel
- Page 294 and 295: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPIn 1987, water fro
- Page 296 and 297: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPE.6 Planned Phase
- Page 298 and 299: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPis most likely ass
- Page 300 and 301: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPsample. If biased
- Page 302 and 303: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPsoils and a draina
- Page 304 and 305: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPE.9.6Buried Infras
- Page 306 and 307: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPE.9.9Decision-Maki
- Page 308 and 309: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPTable E.1 Historic
- Page 310 and 311: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPWMA 12Chemical Pro
- Page 312 and 313: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure E.3 WMA 5 1
- Page 314 and 315: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure E.5 WMA 5 1
- Page 316 and 317: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure E.7 WMA 5 1
- Page 318 and 319: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure E.9 WMA 5 2
- Page 320 and 321: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure E.11 WMA 5
- Page 322 and 323: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure E.13 Histor
- Page 324 and 325: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure E.15 WMA 5
- Page 326 and 327: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure E.17 WMA 5
- Page 328 and 329: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPNew Cooling Tower.
- Page 330 and 331: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPPlateau although t
- Page 332 and 333: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPF.4.2North Plateau
- Page 334 and 335: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPof the Process Bui
- Page 338 and 339: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• Verify Absence
- Page 340 and 341: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• CG w Sampling.
- Page 342 and 343: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• A minimum of t
- Page 344 and 345: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPand analyzed from
- Page 346 and 347: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPcontamination may
- Page 348 and 349: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPF.10 ReferencesDOE
- Page 350 and 351: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPTable F.2 Sample N
- Page 352 and 353: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure F.2 WMA 6 w
- Page 354 and 355: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure F.4 WMA 6 A
- Page 356 and 357: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure F.6 WMA 6 A
- Page 358 and 359: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure F.8 WMA 6 A
- Page 360 and 361: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure F.10 WMA 6
- Page 362 and 363: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPGP10208BH-19A137Cs
- Page 364 and 365: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure F.14 WMA 6
- Page 366 and 367: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure F.16 WMA 6
- Page 368 and 369: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPNFS Shallow Specia
- Page 370 and 371: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPLiquid that collec
- Page 372 and 373: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPeastern ends of th
- Page 374 and 375: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPG.4.3 Drainage Are
- Page 376 and 377: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPPhase 1 will not a
- Page 378 and 379: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPG.9.3 Surface Soil
- Page 380 and 381: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPoIf any 0-15 cm in
- Page 382 and 383: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• Three location
- Page 384 and 385: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• Backfill assoc
WVDP Phase 1 CSAPThe New Cooling Tower will be removed down to its underground structure prior to the initiationof Phase 1 decommissioning activities.The Sewage Treatment Plant, the South Waste Tank Farm Test Tower, the two DemineralizerSludge Ponds, the Equalization Basin, the Equalization Tank, and the remaining concrete floorslabs, foundations, and hardstands will be removed.The Phase 1 work does not include the Rail Spur.F.7 <strong>Conceptual</strong> <strong>Site</strong> <strong>Model</strong>WMA 6 potentially has impacts from a variety of releases. Some of these are surface, and someare subsurface. In addition, surface soil reworking in specific areas of WMA 6 has possiblyresulted in subsurface soil contamination. Specifically:• WMA 6 surface soils were likely affected by the 1968 airborne releases of radioactivityfrom the Process Building stack in WMA 1. These impacts would have originally beengreatest proximal to the Process Building and decreased as one moved south in WMA 6.Since 1968, however, there has been significant surface soil reworking in the northernportion of WMA 6. These activities could have removed contaminated soil layers, buriedthose layers under clean backfill, and/or redistributed/mixed contamination in surfacesoils.• Activities and buried infrastructure associated with the Old Sewage Treatment Facilityare known to have resulted in significant soil contamination that likely remains and thatmay be buried. The exact location of these infrastructure footprints is currently unknown.• The original old sewage treatment plant discharge channel that traversed the centralportion of WMA 6 was contaminated and then buried with clean soil. Subsurface soilcontamination likely remains associated with that original footprint. There are indicationsthat there may low level groundwater impacts associated with this contamination as well.Rev. 1 F-10