Conceptual Site Model - Argonne National Laboratory
Conceptual Site Model - Argonne National Laboratory Conceptual Site Model - Argonne National Laboratory
WVDP Phase 1 CSAPA.4.3.6Interceptor System Operational ReleasesPotentially Affected Media: surface soil, subsurface soil, groundwaterPotentially Affected WMAs: 1, 2During NFS operations, several incidents such as inadvertent transfers of higher-than-intendedactivity occurred in the Interceptor system (in WMA 2), upstream of the Lagoons (also inWMA 2). Documented accounts of leakage and spills in the Interceptor area corroborate thegenerally elevated observed subsurface soil contamination in the area between Lagoon 1 and theProcess Building. Localized subsurface soil contamination can be attributed to these unintendedoperational releases.A.4.3.7Waste Tank Farm Condensate Line LeakPotentially Affected Media: subsurface soil, groundwaterPotentially Affected WMAs: 1, 3Several leaks occurred between 1968 and 1977 that were associated with a condensate line (Line8P-46-6-A5) from Tank 8D-2. The leaks occurred in the section of the line between theEquipment Shelter (in WMA 3) and the Process Building acid recovery pump room (in WMA 1).This line was maintained under vacuum. An unexpected 16,400-gallon liquid volume increase inTank 8D-2 was attributed to groundwater leaking into the line and being drawn into the tank.There is no surface evidence of out-leakage, but the possibility exists of localized groundwatereffects (DOE 2009 Table 2-17; DOE 2010 Section 3.11.5).A.4.3.8Process Building Stack ReleasePotentially Affected Media: surface soilPotentially Affected WMAs: 1, 3In 2001, airborne particulate was released in droplet form from the stack of the Process Building.Excess moisture appears to have become entrained in the ventilation system, and was emittedfrom the stack as droplets containing radioactive particulates. The release occurred over a periodof two months (September – October 2001). The radioactivity release rate was too low to result inRev. 1 A-8
WVDP Phase 1 CSAPany stack monitoring alarms. The release was discovered during routine radiation surveysconducted in November 2001 when workers found fixed radioactivity in unexpected locationsnear the Process Building stack. Total releases were less than 0.5% of the administrative releaselimits. Measurements of 4.8E-04 uCi gross beta were recorded. The fallout was confined to thearea several hundred feet from the Process Building, in WMA 1 and WMA 3. Accessible abovebackgroundspots were decontaminated (DOE 2009 Table 2-18; DOE 2010 Section 3.11.5).A.5 Existing DataExisting data sets for this area include:• In 1982, static direct exposure readings were collected across the WVDP premises(WVNSCO 1982). A portion of WMA 1 was covered by these measurements on a 10-mgrid. Figure A.12 shows these results color-coded by the exposure readings encountered.These data indicated the potential for significant surface contamination within the WMA1 boundary; their interpretation, however, is complicated by potential shine from theProcess Building.• In 1990 and 1991, a second static direct exposure measurement program was conductedacross the WVDP premises, including the accessible portions of WMA 1(WVNSCO 1992). This data collection used different instrumentation and protocols thanthe 1982 study, so the results are not quantitatively comparable. Figure A.13 shows theseresults. These data show a significant change for the western and southern portions ofWMA 1, with significantly lower measured gross activity than the 1982 study. There area couple of possible explanations for the decrease: (1) this could reflect the removal ofcontaminated surface soil associated with maintenance and construction activities aroundWMA 1; or (2) it could reflect the placement of surface material (e.g., gravel orpavement) on top of contaminated soils; or (3) it could be that the 1982 readings wereaffected by shine from Process Building and associated structures whose sources weremitigated by decommissioning activities in the intervening years.• There is some soil sampling data for WMA 1 available within ELIMS. Figure A.14shows the locations of soil cores with subsurface soil samples. There are no sediment orsurface soil results for WMA 1. The bulk of the data were collected either in 1993, 1994,Rev. 1 A-9
- Page 74 and 75: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPscans will be empl
- Page 76 and 77: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPThis page intentio
- Page 78 and 79: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPperformance for th
- Page 80 and 81: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPThis page intentio
- Page 82 and 83: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP3. Utility Surveys
- Page 84 and 85: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPField notebooks wi
- Page 86 and 87: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP10.2 Groundwater S
- Page 88 and 89: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPphotographs are ta
- Page 90 and 91: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPthe course of fiel
- Page 92 and 93: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP10.6.2 Additional
- Page 94 and 95: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPplan will identify
- Page 96 and 97: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure 7 WVDP Radi
- Page 98 and 99: Table 5: Estimated Scanning Minimum
- Page 100 and 101: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPpotentially exceed
- Page 102 and 103: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• Each detector
- Page 104 and 105: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPThis page intentio
- Page 106 and 107: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP12.2 Standard Labo
- Page 108 and 109: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPThis page intentio
- Page 110 and 111: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPThis page intentio
- Page 112 and 113: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• The data compl
- Page 114 and 115: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPThis page intentio
- Page 116 and 117: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPThis page intentio
- Page 118 and 119: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPVitrification Faci
- Page 120 and 121: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPA.4 Known and Susp
- Page 122 and 123: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPthe sanitary sewer
- Page 126 and 127: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP1998, or 2008, and
- Page 128 and 129: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPcontaminated surfa
- Page 130 and 131: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPdata collection is
- Page 132 and 133: WVDP Phase 1 CSAParranged on a tria
- Page 134 and 135: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• Slurry Wall Fo
- Page 136 and 137: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• If contaminati
- Page 138 and 139: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPappears to extend
- Page 140 and 141: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPTable A.2 Sample N
- Page 142 and 143: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure A.2 WMA 1 w
- Page 144 and 145: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure A.4 North P
- Page 146 and 147: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure A.6 WMA 1 A
- Page 148 and 149: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure A.8 WMA 1 A
- Page 150 and 151: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure A.10 WMA 1
- Page 152 and 153: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure A.12 WMA 1
- Page 154 and 155: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPGP-10108GP-10308BH
- Page 156 and 157: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure A.16 WMA 1
- Page 158 and 159: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure A.18 Phase
- Page 160 and 161: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure A.20 Initia
- Page 162 and 163: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure A.22 Initia
- Page 164 and 165: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPThis page intentio
- Page 166 and 167: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• Lagoon 1 was a
- Page 168 and 169: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPSolvent Dike. The
- Page 170 and 171: WVDP Phase 1 CSAP• An exception t
- Page 172 and 173: WVDP Phase 1 CSAPFigure B.8 shows W
WVDP Phase 1 CSAPA.4.3.6Interceptor System Operational ReleasesPotentially Affected Media: surface soil, subsurface soil, groundwaterPotentially Affected WMAs: 1, 2During NFS operations, several incidents such as inadvertent transfers of higher-than-intendedactivity occurred in the Interceptor system (in WMA 2), upstream of the Lagoons (also inWMA 2). Documented accounts of leakage and spills in the Interceptor area corroborate thegenerally elevated observed subsurface soil contamination in the area between Lagoon 1 and theProcess Building. Localized subsurface soil contamination can be attributed to these unintendedoperational releases.A.4.3.7Waste Tank Farm Condensate Line LeakPotentially Affected Media: subsurface soil, groundwaterPotentially Affected WMAs: 1, 3Several leaks occurred between 1968 and 1977 that were associated with a condensate line (Line8P-46-6-A5) from Tank 8D-2. The leaks occurred in the section of the line between theEquipment Shelter (in WMA 3) and the Process Building acid recovery pump room (in WMA 1).This line was maintained under vacuum. An unexpected 16,400-gallon liquid volume increase inTank 8D-2 was attributed to groundwater leaking into the line and being drawn into the tank.There is no surface evidence of out-leakage, but the possibility exists of localized groundwatereffects (DOE 2009 Table 2-17; DOE 2010 Section 3.11.5).A.4.3.8Process Building Stack ReleasePotentially Affected Media: surface soilPotentially Affected WMAs: 1, 3In 2001, airborne particulate was released in droplet form from the stack of the Process Building.Excess moisture appears to have become entrained in the ventilation system, and was emittedfrom the stack as droplets containing radioactive particulates. The release occurred over a periodof two months (September – October 2001). The radioactivity release rate was too low to result inRev. 1 A-8