legislation is so fond of claiming that it exists to protector preserve?The e-mail petitionThe following section of text has been taken from thee-petitions website and explains what these petitionsare and how they are managed. The source of the textis formally acknowledged.“Downing Street is working in partnership with the nonpartisancharitable project ‘mySociety’ to provide a serviceto allow citizens, charities and campaign groups to set uppetitions that are hosted on the Downing Street website,enabling anyone to address and deliver a petition directlyto the Prime Minister.‘mySociety’ is a charitable project that runs many ofthe UK’s best-known non-partisan political websites,like HearFromYourMP.com and TheyWorkForYou.com.‘mySociety’ is strictly neutral on party political issues, andthe e-petition service is within its remit to build websiteswhich give people simple, tangible benefits in the civic andcommunity aspects of their lives. For more informationabout ‘mySociety’ and its work, visit its website.The e-petition system has been designed to be transparentand trustworthy. For legal and anti-spam reasons thissite cannot host every petition submitted, but the rule isto accept everything that meets the terms and conditionsof use.No petition will be rejected unless it violates these terms.And even when petitions cannot be hosted No10 will stillpublish as much of rejected petitions as is consistent withlegal and anti-spam requirements, including the reason whyit could not be hosted.If you have any questions about the service, you can emaileither the Downing Street web team at webmaster@pmo.gov.uk or ‘mySociety’ atteam@mysociety.org.”It should be noted that the rules for submissions of e-petitions are quite stringent. For example, the petitionmust be no longer than 1000 characters – not words!- and it must be acceptable to the team of peoplemanaging the site. That meant that we could not sayexactly what we wanted to say in our petition and besure that it would be accepted for publication on thewebsite. We also thought that we had better get thispetition onto the site as soon as possible because wehad been informed that only one petition per topicwould be accepted.The actual petition is reproduced below:“The Sportsman’s <strong>Association</strong> of Great Britain & NorthernIreland, acting on behalf of all legitimate shooting sportsmenand women who were affected by the so-called ‘handgun ban’in 1997, calls upon the Government to take the necessaryaction to comply with the Olympic Charter by enablingtarget shooters to participate in the demanding and difficultsport of target pistol shooting at the Olympic Games andelsewhere.This can be done without any danger to public safety astarget pistol shooting, wherever it is practised, has alwayshad an excellent safety record. Target pistols to be keptunder suitable security conditions, as they always hadbeen, and be available for use by members of Home OfficeApproved Clubs.”It will be seen that this petition is intended to call forthe restoration of target pistol shooting for all, not justfor an Olympic elite, but we felt that our most effectivelever was the Olympic Charter.It is, perhaps, appropriate to reflect upon the pastachievements of our pistol shooting greats. Thepistol shooters from the Home Countries performedextremely well at the Melbourne CommonwealthGames last year and Mick Gault, our most prolificmedal winner for any sport at this level of competition,was among them!The fact that they did so well, despite the currentrestrictions imposed on the sport, is a tribute to thededication of the current team members but doesraise the question: Where will the next generationof pistol shooters come from to represent us at theLondon Olympic Games in 2012 and beyond? Ageis the inevitable destroyer of sporting ability and ourpresent top-level shooters cannot continue at that levelindefinitely. They will need to be replaced with newblood that should now be undergoing the necessarytraining.The two Firearms (Amendment) Acts, 1997, asdescribed above, effectively destroyed the sport oftarget pistol shooting for the vast majority of peopleand, taken in conjunction with the Home OfficeApproval Criteria for target shooting Clubs, madeit harder for newcomers to gain access to such clubsand to the sport.Most of the clubs suffered a significant loss ofmembership when pistols were banned (in manycases the loss was of the order of fifty percent). Suchlosses reduce the options for possible selection forour teams – be it at local or international level - andthis must augur ill for our chances in future majorcompetitions.The pistol ban was introduced, to make us all ‘safer,’by politicians who were only interested in electoraladvantage. The present Government has shown thatit has little or no interest in shooting apart from whenmedals are won by our people. Even then, Governmentrepresentatives tend to ignore the shooting medallistswhen seeking photo opportunities.Gun crime has actually increased significantly sincethe ban – what more evidence of the futility of the bando we need?It is time for the ban to be lifted and for the sportof target shooting with pistols to be resurrected forall, not just the competitive elite. The Sportsman’s34
<strong>Association</strong> calls on all sports men and women tosupport this cause.Whatever one may think of the effectiveness of petitionsin general, we understand that the Government ispaying close attention to the progress of these petitionsand I urge all of you who have an interest in pistolshooting or, indeed, in personal freedom of choice, totake the time to visit the website and, if you can agreewith it, sign the SAGBNI petition.Our petition may be found by going to:http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/TargetPistolsPlease spread the word and get as many people aspossible to sign this petition too and let us make thebest possible use of what may be our last opportunityto persuade the Government of the justice of ourcause.The Olympic Charter issue could be a powerful factorin our campaign and could even be gratefully seizedupon by the Government as a mechanism to employ,without too much loss of face, to make the necessaryarrangements that would also be to its own advantageas 2012 approaches.LETTERS FROM SHANGHAI – 1864 TO 1872by Tim KidnerIn 1864 one of my distant relatives William Kidnerset up business in Shanghai as an architect; in 1866he was joined by one of his younger brothers James.During their time in Shanghai they both wrote lettershome, mainly to their sister Ann, some of which havesurvived; they contain a number of references to theVolunteer Force and target shooting in Shanghai, HongKong and also Wimbledon when William was homeon leave in 1872. The letters also cover the changeoverfrom Enfield muzzle loaders to Snider conversionsand then replacement by the Martini Henry rifle – inthe letters they are referred to as the Henri Martinirifles!The earliest letter is dated 13 February 1864; it waswritten by William on his way to Shanghai, and wasposted from Malta. In this letter he mentions hisstopover at Gibraltar:I was quite surprised to see on the neutral groundbetween Gibraltar and the Spanish ground a huntingparty in full chase. The horsemen dressed in scarletjust as you would see them in England. I supposethey were officers of the garrison.William wrote again on 25 February on his arrival atSuez on the Red Sea relating his progress across thedesert - the Suez Canal did not open until 1869 - andcommented:. . . the journey across the desert to Suez is asmiserable as you can imagine, one vast sandy plainin every direction only relieved every now and thenby an Arab encampment and string of camels.William set up business as an architect in Shanghai;in 1866 his brother James travelled out to join him,arriving in Shanghai on 26 June 1866. James wasimpressed by what he saw in Shanghai and wrotehome:Shanghai is a very nice place, very much nicer thanI expected to find it. It is very much like a Europeantown.James wrote of his progress in October 1866 andcommented:. . . the rifle shooting for prizes takes place on the11 th , 12 th and 13 th next. I hope to win something, Ifind I cannot shoot nearly so well as I could at home,the climate affects one so. The intense heat scathesone and shakes the nerves.In the same letter he requests:. . . 1000 rounds of bullets and wads for myself andWilliam for our smallbores.James wrote again in November confirming thatthe prize meeting had taken place, organised by theShanghai Volunteer Corps, at which William won twoprizes and James won a prize of £40 which he usedfor ordering a new breech-loading rifle from Harveyof Exeter. In this letter he also comments on theforthcoming change to Snider breech loading rifles:. . . our rifles are smooth bores or nearly so and thesun and the glaring light which we get here is veryunfavourable to good shooting. Sometimes at about400 or 500 yards the sun is so bad that you canscarcely see the target. We are now talking aboutgetting Snider breech loaders from England in placeof the gas pipes which we have at present.By the 1860s there were already French and Americanas well as British settlements in Shanghai and theattitude of the Europeans to the local population was‘Victorian’. In one of his early letters James commentsthat:. . . the Chinese settlement is very dirty but not asbad as I had imagined – the Chinese themselves area very barbarous looking set, especially the lowerclasses. The servants here seem to be the greatestnuisance, one of William’s has this morning boltedwith his cash box but I do not think he had much init. Two or three days ago he caught one of his cooliescarrying off 5 bottles of wine.35