SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us
SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us
Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Proposed Action and AlternativesTable 2–14 Unit Equipment Comparisons — 4/25 th IBCT and 2/25 th SBCTParameterFort Richardson4/25 th IBCT 2/25 th SBCTSoldiers 3,538 4,105Intelligence, Surveillance, & ReconnaissanceUnmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) 19 4VehiclesWheeled Support Vehicles 926 588Combat Vehicles 0 317 Strykers (27 MGS incl.)Tracked Vehicles 0 0Direct Fire SystemsMobile Gun Systems 0 27Javelins 80 121Anti-Tank Guided Missile 0 9Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ITAS) 28 0Indirect Fire SystemsMortars: 120 mm/81 mm/60 mm 12/8/14 36/12/18Howitzers: M119 (105 mm) 16 0Howitzers M777 0 18Cantonment Infrastructure: Facilities vacated by the 4/25 th would initially support a majority of thecritical facilities for the 2/25 th SBCT, including office space, housing, and parking and maintenancespace. Fort Richardson currently has administrative office buildings and temporary relocatable facilitiesthat are being used to support the 4/25 th . Although these facilities are outdated and smaller thanthe square footage of standard BCT space required, they would support the near-term administrativegarrison operations of the 31 companies that comprise the 2/25 th until they could be renovated andnew ones constructed where necessary in the 2012 time frame. Currently, the construction of new unitoffice space for the 4/25 th is programmed and planned. Stationing of the SBCT at Fort Richardsonwould require the programming of one to two additional administrative office buildings, above whatis currently planned.Fort Richardson currently possesses the extra enlisted barracks space initially required to accommodatethe 200 to 300 extra single enlisted Soldiers of the 2/25 th SBCT requiring barracks space as partof this alternative. The existing facilities are outdated and smaller than standard facilities, but theywould meet the initial stationing requirements of the 2/25 th until new facilities could be programmedin 2012. Due to a lack of on-post Family housing to support the additional Families of the 2/25 th , itwould be anticipated that a majority of single officers and married enlisted Soldiers would live offpostwhere there is adequate housing available in the surrounding community for the 300 to 400 additionalSoldiers and their Families. Currently, the renovation of barracks for the 4/25 th is programmedand planned. The stationing of the SBCT would require the construction of a larger barracks spaceabove what is currently planned.At Fort Richardson, the 4/25 th uses a combination of improved surface military vehicle parking spaceand graveled parking space (Figure 2–7). There is a plan to construct an additional 1,086,516 squarefeet of improved parking space in 2012 and space is available next to the existing military vehicleparking area to build the additional combat vehicle parking space. Until this time, however, two ormore battalions of the SBCT would be required to park on unimproved surface. In addition, some ofthe units of the 2/25 th would be required to conduct maintenance activities on unimproved surface forFebruary 2008 2–31 2/25th SBCT Final EIS
Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Proposed Action and AlternativesFigure 2–7Existing Configuration of Garrison Infrastructure to Support the 2/25thSBCTseveral years until an extension of the motor pool facility could be completed. In the interim, vehiclemaintenance operations and parking would be constrained, particularly given the extended coldweather of the Alaskan winter. The construction of indoor vehicle maintenance facilities would needto be expedited to support the 2/25 th SBCT’s fleet of Stryker vehicles. In implementing Alternative B,SBCT vehicles would need to be winterized, receiving chains and other winter equipment as well asadding heavier weight engine oil, transmission fluid, brake fluid, and other petroleum and lubricantsto the vehicles.Training Range and Training Support Infrastructure Construction: Fort Richardson currentlypossesses a majority of the training ranges and facilities required to support the live-fire training activitiesof the 2/25 th SBCT. Fort Richardson training infrastructure includes the full suite of trainingranges required to maintain SBCT training readiness standards, with the exception of the BAX,MPMG, and UAC. Fort Richardson would use its MPTR as a substitute for the anti-armor trackingrange, which is an acceptable substitute under Army training doctrine (TC 25–8 Training Ranges).Because Fort Richardson does not have the required training space to accommodate construction of aBAX, the 2/25 th would use the BAX at DTA that has already been programmed to support the trainingof the 1/25 th SBCT stationed at Fort Wainwright. A CACTF is also being constructed at DTA.Construction of the BAX and CACTF are slated for completion in 2008 and should be available foruse by the 2/25 th SBCT when it completes its deployment in 2009. The BAX and CACTF ranges havethe capacity to support the training requirements of both the 1/25 th and 2/25 th SBCT. To accommodatethe full measure of SBCT training requirements of the 2/25 th SBCT, an MPMG range and anUAC would be constructed at Fort Richardson to implement the Proposed Action under AlternativeFebruary 2008 2–32 2/25th SBCT Final EIS
- Page 35 and 36: ContentsTable 5-13 Summary of Poten
- Page 37 and 38: ContentsAppendicesAppendix A Screen
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and Needstruc
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and Needports
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and NeedACP t
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and Needtions
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and NeedAt th
- Page 49 and 50: Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and Needclose
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and Needpermi
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and Need• E
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and NeedThe r
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 59 and 60: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 61 and 62: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 65 and 66: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 73 and 74: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 85: !!( 3 !( 1 !( 1!(UAC!(AnchorageMPMG
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 95 and 96: ModelRes.OTERO CO.LAS ANIMAS CO.£
- Page 97 and 98: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 99 and 100: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 101 and 102: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 105 and 106: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 107 and 108: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 109 and 110: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 111 and 112: CHAPTER 3AFFECTED ENVIRONMENTThis c
- Page 113 and 114: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentE
- Page 115 and 116: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environments
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentM
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentT
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentR
- Page 123 and 124: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environment8
- Page 125 and 126: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentT
- Page 127 and 128: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environment1
- Page 129 and 130: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmentm
- Page 131 and 132: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentS
- Page 133 and 134: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmentt
- Page 135 and 136: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentT
Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Proposed Action and AlternativesTable 2–14 Unit Equipment Comparisons — 4/25 th IBCT and 2/25 th <strong>SBCT</strong>ParameterFort Richardson4/25 th IBCT 2/25 th <strong>SBCT</strong>Soldiers 3,538 4,105Intelligence, Surveillance, & ReconnaissanceUnmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) 19 4VehiclesWheeled Support Vehicles 926 588Combat Vehicles 0 317 Strykers (27 MGS incl.)Tracked Vehicles 0 0Direct Fire SystemsMobile Gun Systems 0 27Javelins 80 121Anti-Tank Guided Missile 0 9Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ITAS) 28 0Indirect Fire SystemsMortars: 120 mm/81 mm/60 mm 12/8/14 36/12/18Howitzers: M119 (105 mm) 16 0Howitzers M777 0 18Cantonment Infrastructure: Facilities vacated by the 4/25 th would initially support a majority of thecritical facilities for the 2/25 th <strong>SBCT</strong>, including office space, ho<strong>us</strong>ing, and parking and maintenancespace. Fort Richardson currently has administrative office buildings and temporary relocatable facilitiesthat are being <strong>us</strong>ed to support the 4/25 th . Although these facilities are outdated and smaller thanthe square footage of standard BCT space required, they would support the near-term administrativegarrison operations of the 31 companies that comprise the 2/25 th until they could be renovated andnew ones constructed where necessary in the 2012 time frame. Currently, the construction of new unitoffice space for the 4/25 th is programmed and planned. Stationing of the <strong>SBCT</strong> at Fort Richardsonwould require the programming of one to two additional administrative office buildings, above whatis currently planned.Fort Richardson currently possesses the extra enlisted barracks space initially required to accommodatethe 200 to 300 extra single enlisted Soldiers of the 2/25 th <strong>SBCT</strong> requiring barracks space as partof this alternative. The existing facilities are outdated and smaller than standard facilities, but theywould meet the initial stationing requirements of the 2/25 th until new facilities could be programmedin 2012. Due to a lack of on-post Family ho<strong>us</strong>ing to support the additional Families of the 2/25 th , itwould be anticipated that a majority of single officers and married enlisted Soldiers would live offpostwhere there is adequate ho<strong>us</strong>ing available in the surrounding community for the 300 to 400 additionalSoldiers and their Families. Currently, the renovation of barracks for the 4/25 th is programmedand planned. The stationing of the <strong>SBCT</strong> would require the construction of a larger barracks spaceabove what is currently planned.At Fort Richardson, the 4/25 th <strong>us</strong>es a combination of improved surface military vehicle parking spaceand graveled parking space (Figure 2–7). There is a plan to construct an additional 1,086,516 squarefeet of improved parking space in 2012 and space is available next to the existing military vehicleparking area to build the additional combat vehicle parking space. Until this time, however, two ormore battalions of the <strong>SBCT</strong> would be required to park on unimproved surface. In addition, some ofthe units of the 2/25 th would be required to conduct maintenance activities on unimproved surface forFebruary 2008 2–31 2/25th <strong>SBCT</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>