SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us
Share Embed Flag
Download ePaper

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

govsupport.us
from govsupport.us More from this publisher
10.07.2015 Views

Chapter 5 – Environmental Consequences5.6.3.14 FacilitiesCumulative impacts to facilities could result from the combination of Alternative C and populationgrowth near FTC. Cumulative impacts to facilities are expected to be less than significant.5.6.4 Alternative D − No ActionThe cumulative impact analysis for Alternative D focuses on impacts on the environment resultingfrom the incremental impact of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonablyforeseeable future actions. Past and present actions are accounted for in the description of the affectedenvironment for each resource.Under Alternative D, no project-related construction or training associated with the permanentstationing of the 2/25 th SBCT would occur at any of the three locations described under AlternativesA, B, or C. Current ongoing and planned projects not related to permanent stationing of the SBCTunit would continue at all of the installations to meet Army needs. As a result, Alternative D wouldnot contribute to any new cumulative impacts to any resources in the regions surrounding SBMR,DMR, KTA, KLOA, PTA, FRA, DTA, FTC, or PCMS, beyond those that are already occurring orwould occur because of implementation of the other projects that have been identified within eachrespective cumulative impact area.February 2008 5-274 2/25th SBCT Final EIS

CHAPTER 6PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORSThis EIS was prepared by ARCADIS U.S., Inc. under the direction of the U.S. Army. The followingtables present the names of individuals and their area or areas of responsibility in preparing this EIS.Table 6-1 Army StaffName Project Responsibility OrganizationAlvin Char USAG-HI Environmental Integration U.S. Army Garrison HawaiiArmor Brown HQDA Force Management Integration DAMO-FMICarrie McEnteer U.S. Army Alaska EnvironmentalU.S. Army AlaskaCoordinatorChad Henry HQDA Training Integration DAMO-TRSDavid Howlett HQDA Legal Review Environmental Law Division (ELD)Debra Owings Fort Carson Coordinator Fort Carson Environmental DivisionGary Larsen U.S. Army Alaska Facilities - DPW U.S. Army AlaskaKathy Davis U.S. Army Alaska Training Integration U.S. Army AlaskaKevin Gardner U.S. Army Alaska EnvironmentalU.S. Army AlaskaCoordinatorLaurie Lucking USAG-HI Cultural Resources Coordinator U.S. Army Garrison HawaiiLynn Schneider USACE Facilities/EnvironmentalU.S. Army Corps of EngineersCoordinatorMark Katkow USAG-HI Legal Review U.S. Army Garrison HawaiiMichael Ackerman EIS Project Manager Army Environmental CommandMichelle Mansker USAG-HI Biological Resources Coordinator U.S. Army Garrison HawaiiMike Egami USAG-HI Public Affairs U.S. Army Garrison HawaiiMead Klavetter Fort Carson Wildlife Biologist Fort Carson Environmental DivisionPam Cowen Fort Carson Cultural Resources Manager Fort Carson Environmental DivisionRobert DiMichele Public Affairs U.S. Army Environmental CommandRobin Renn Pinon Canyon Environmental Coordinator Fort Carson Environmental DivisionRonald Borne USAG-HI Transformation Coordinator U.S. Army Garrison HawaiiScott Farley Legal Review U.S. Army Environmental CommandThomas Stewart U.S. Army Pacific Integration U.S. Army Pacific CommandThomas Warren Fort Carson Environmental Integration Fort Carson Environmental DivisionTracey Gruis Corps of Engineers Integration U.S. Army Corps of EngineersWilliam Rogers U.S. Army Garrison Hawaii EnvironmentalIntegrationU.S. Army Garrison HawaiiFebruary 2008 6–1 2/25th SBCT Final EIS

Chapter 5 – Environmental Consequences5.6.3.14 FacilitiesCumulative impacts to facilities could result from the combination of Alternative C and populationgrowth near FTC. Cumulative impacts to facilities are expected to be less than significant.5.6.4 Alternative D − No ActionThe cumulative impact analysis for Alternative D foc<strong>us</strong>es on impacts on the environment resultingfrom the incremental impact of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonablyforeseeable future actions. Past and present actions are accounted for in the description of the affectedenvironment for each resource.Under Alternative D, no project-related construction or training associated with the permanentstationing of the 2/25 th <strong>SBCT</strong> would occur at any of the three locations described under AlternativesA, B, or C. Current ongoing and planned projects not related to permanent stationing of the <strong>SBCT</strong>unit would continue at all of the installations to meet Army needs. As a result, Alternative D wouldnot contribute to any new cumulative impacts to any resources in the regions surrounding SBMR,DMR, KTA, KLOA, PTA, FRA, DTA, FTC, or PCMS, beyond those that are already occurring orwould occur beca<strong>us</strong>e of implementation of the other projects that have been identified within eachrespective cumulative impact area.February 2008 5-274 2/25th <strong>SBCT</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>

logo

products

Resources

Company

Terms of service
Privacy policy
Cookie policy
Cookie settings
Imprint
Change language
Made with love in Switzerland
© 2024 Yumpu.com all rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!