SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

Chapter 5 – Environmental Consequences5.5.13.1.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingNo ImpactsManeuver training would continue at all current training areas using existing equipment and trainingmethods. Maneuver training, which would occur at SBMR, DMR, KTA, and PTA, would not includeflights by UAVs of the 2/25 th ID (Light) as the unit did not possess UAVs prior to its conversion.5.5.13.2 Alaska5.5.13.2.1 Impacts from Cantonment ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers stationed at FRA would remain the same. Therefore, no additionalcantonment facilities would be constructed. Consequently, there would be no impacts to airspaceresources.5.5.13.2.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers training at FRA and DTA would remain the same and no additionalranges would be constructed. Consequently, there would be no new impacts to airspace resources.5.5.13.2.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingNo ImpactsThe number of required live-fire user days per year at FRA and DTA would continue at currentlevels. Thus, impacts to airspace resources caused by live-fire training would remain at current levels.5.5.13.2.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers stationed and training at FRA and DTA would remain the same.Maneuver training intensity and frequency at FRA and DTA would remain at levels seen today.Airspace restrictions and UAV flights in support of maneuver training would continue in their currentconditions.5.5.13.3 Colorado5.5.13.3.1 Impacts from Cantonment ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers stationed and training at FTC and PCMS would remain the same.However, some additional cantonment facilities would be constructed to meet the needs of theunaccompanied Soldiers that are currently housed off post. Construction of these projects would notcause any impacts to airspace resources.February 2008 5-238 2/25th SBCT Final EIS