SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

govsupport.us
from govsupport.us More from this publisher
10.07.2015 Views

Chapter 5 – Environmental ConsequencesTable 5-60 Summary of Potential Hazardous Material and Hazardous WasteImpacts from Alternative DLocationHawaii Alaska ColoradoKTA/Activity Group SBMR DMR KLOA PTA FRA DTA FTC PCMSImpacts from CantonmentConstruction N/A N/A N/A N/A ☼ N/AImpacts from RangeConstruction☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ Impacts from Live-FireTrainingImpacts from ManeuverTraining☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ = Significant + = Beneficial Impact = Significant but mitigable to less than significant N/A = Not Applicable☼ = Less than Significant = No Impact5.5.9.1.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionLess Than Significant ImpactsUnder the No Action Alternative hazardous materials would be generated through range maintenanceactivities. Soils contaminated with lead would be properly handled and reused to maintain berms.Hazardous materials and wastes would continue to be managed in accordance with existing federal,state, installation-wide hazardous materials management plans, the current Army protocols, andSOPs.Depleted Uranium. Ongoing remediation activities associated with the DU would continue underimplementation of the No Action Alternative. A comprehensive remediation strategy is beingdeveloped and implemented in consultation with the appropriate state and federal regulators.5.5.9.1.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsAmmunition. Live-fire exercises would continue as a part of meeting the training requirements of the2/25 th ID (L). Training would occur on existing ranges. Continued use of munitions by during trainingcould affect the training lands. Under the No Action alternative, ammunition handling, storage, anddisposal would continue at current levels. Existing weapons would continue to be used as part ofcurrent force training. Range contamination would continue to accumulate until range closure andremedial cleanup, but there would be no increase in ammunition used, so there would be onlyconsistent levels of ongoing increased contamination. It is not likely that general training would resultin any significant impacts. Current force training would continue to follow existing USAG-HIprotocol.February 2008 5-220 2/25th SBCT Final EIS

Chapter 5 – Environmental ConsequencesUnexploded Ordnance. The quantity of ammunition used during training would remain roughly thesame as was analyzed in the 2004 EIS for Transformation of the 2/25 th ID (L). Therefore, no increasesin potential impacts from the presence of UXO are expected.Contaminated Sites. Training would continue at all existing training sites. The IRP investigations onSBMR, SBER, and WAAF would continue under existing USAG-HI protocol.Lead. Current force would continue live-fire training with lead-containing ammunition. Continuedammunition use could increase the volume of soil that needs to be remediated for lead in the future.All live-fire activities that could present a source of lead contamination to the soils would becontained in the existing ordnance impact area, and no new ordnance impact areas would beintroduced. Ordnance clearance and cleanup would follow existing federal, state, and Army protocols.There would be no change to training operations at these installations.5.5.9.1.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsPetroleum, Oils, and Lubricants. The Army would continue to follow federal, state, and Armyprotocol. Wheeled vehicles would continue to be used by current forces in maneuver training onSBMR, DMR, KTA, and PTA. Consequently, the potential exists for spills of these products duringmaneuver training. However, continued implementation of regulatory and administrative mitigationmeasures is expected to limit the potential impacts to human health and safety to less than significant.5.5.9.2 Alaska5.5.9.2.1 Impacts from Cantonment ConstructionNo ImpactsNo change in the Soldier population would occur. Although construction of any required projectswould proceed as needed, no projects are currently planned. Consequently, no impacts are expected tohuman health and safety.No impacts would be expected from asbestos, LBP, PCBs, pesticides/herbicides, biomedical waste, orradon under the No Action. Overall, impacts to human health and safety are expected to be less thansignificant. Continued implementation of regulatory and administrative mitigation measures isexpected to reduce the potential impacts to human health and safety to less than significant.5.5.9.2.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionNo ImpactsNo change in the Soldier population would occur. No range construction projects are currentlyplanned. Consequently, no impacts are expected to human health and safety.5.5.9.2.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsAmmunition. Live-fire exercises would continue at current levels as a part of current force training.Continued use of munitions by current forces during training could affect the training lands. UnderFebruary 2008 5-221 2/25th SBCT Final EIS

Chapter 5 – Environmental ConsequencesUnexploded Ordnance. The quantity of ammunition <strong>us</strong>ed during training would remain roughly thesame as was analyzed in the 2004 <strong>EIS</strong> for Transformation of the 2/25 th ID (L). Therefore, no increasesin potential impacts from the presence of UXO are expected.Contaminated Sites. Training would continue at all existing training sites. The IRP investigations onSBMR, SBER, and WAAF would continue under existing USAG-HI protocol.Lead. Current force would continue live-fire training with lead-containing ammunition. Continuedammunition <strong>us</strong>e could increase the volume of soil that needs to be remediated for lead in the future.All live-fire activities that could present a source of lead contamination to the soils would becontained in the existing ordnance impact area, and no new ordnance impact areas would beintroduced. Ordnance clearance and cleanup would follow existing federal, state, and Army protocols.There would be no change to training operations at these installations.5.5.9.1.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsPetroleum, Oils, and Lubricants. The Army would continue to follow federal, state, and Armyprotocol. Wheeled vehicles would continue to be <strong>us</strong>ed by current forces in maneuver training onSBMR, DMR, KTA, and PTA. Consequently, the potential exists for spills of these products duringmaneuver training. However, continued implementation of regulatory and administrative mitigationmeasures is expected to limit the potential impacts to human health and safety to less than significant.5.5.9.2 Alaska5.5.9.2.1 Impacts from Cantonment ConstructionNo ImpactsNo change in the Soldier population would occur. Although construction of any required projectswould proceed as needed, no projects are currently planned. Consequently, no impacts are expected tohuman health and safety.No impacts would be expected from asbestos, LBP, PCBs, pesticides/herbicides, biomedical waste, orradon under the No Action. Overall, impacts to human health and safety are expected to be less thansignificant. Continued implementation of regulatory and administrative mitigation measures isexpected to reduce the potential impacts to human health and safety to less than significant.5.5.9.2.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionNo ImpactsNo change in the Soldier population would occur. No range construction projects are currentlyplanned. Consequently, no impacts are expected to human health and safety.5.5.9.2.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsAmmunition. Live-fire exercises would continue at current levels as a part of current force training.Continued <strong>us</strong>e of munitions by current forces during training could affect the training lands. UnderFebruary 2008 5-221 2/25th <strong>SBCT</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!