SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us
SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us
Chapter 5 – Environmental ConsequencesTable 5-60 Summary of Potential Hazardous Material and Hazardous WasteImpacts from Alternative DLocationHawaii Alaska ColoradoKTA/Activity Group SBMR DMR KLOA PTA FRA DTA FTC PCMSImpacts from CantonmentConstruction N/A N/A N/A N/A ☼ N/AImpacts from RangeConstruction☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ Impacts from Live-FireTrainingImpacts from ManeuverTraining☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ = Significant + = Beneficial Impact = Significant but mitigable to less than significant N/A = Not Applicable☼ = Less than Significant = No Impact5.5.9.1.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionLess Than Significant ImpactsUnder the No Action Alternative hazardous materials would be generated through range maintenanceactivities. Soils contaminated with lead would be properly handled and reused to maintain berms.Hazardous materials and wastes would continue to be managed in accordance with existing federal,state, installation-wide hazardous materials management plans, the current Army protocols, andSOPs.Depleted Uranium. Ongoing remediation activities associated with the DU would continue underimplementation of the No Action Alternative. A comprehensive remediation strategy is beingdeveloped and implemented in consultation with the appropriate state and federal regulators.5.5.9.1.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsAmmunition. Live-fire exercises would continue as a part of meeting the training requirements of the2/25 th ID (L). Training would occur on existing ranges. Continued use of munitions by during trainingcould affect the training lands. Under the No Action alternative, ammunition handling, storage, anddisposal would continue at current levels. Existing weapons would continue to be used as part ofcurrent force training. Range contamination would continue to accumulate until range closure andremedial cleanup, but there would be no increase in ammunition used, so there would be onlyconsistent levels of ongoing increased contamination. It is not likely that general training would resultin any significant impacts. Current force training would continue to follow existing USAG-HIprotocol.February 2008 5-220 2/25th SBCT Final EIS
Chapter 5 – Environmental ConsequencesUnexploded Ordnance. The quantity of ammunition used during training would remain roughly thesame as was analyzed in the 2004 EIS for Transformation of the 2/25 th ID (L). Therefore, no increasesin potential impacts from the presence of UXO are expected.Contaminated Sites. Training would continue at all existing training sites. The IRP investigations onSBMR, SBER, and WAAF would continue under existing USAG-HI protocol.Lead. Current force would continue live-fire training with lead-containing ammunition. Continuedammunition use could increase the volume of soil that needs to be remediated for lead in the future.All live-fire activities that could present a source of lead contamination to the soils would becontained in the existing ordnance impact area, and no new ordnance impact areas would beintroduced. Ordnance clearance and cleanup would follow existing federal, state, and Army protocols.There would be no change to training operations at these installations.5.5.9.1.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsPetroleum, Oils, and Lubricants. The Army would continue to follow federal, state, and Armyprotocol. Wheeled vehicles would continue to be used by current forces in maneuver training onSBMR, DMR, KTA, and PTA. Consequently, the potential exists for spills of these products duringmaneuver training. However, continued implementation of regulatory and administrative mitigationmeasures is expected to limit the potential impacts to human health and safety to less than significant.5.5.9.2 Alaska5.5.9.2.1 Impacts from Cantonment ConstructionNo ImpactsNo change in the Soldier population would occur. Although construction of any required projectswould proceed as needed, no projects are currently planned. Consequently, no impacts are expected tohuman health and safety.No impacts would be expected from asbestos, LBP, PCBs, pesticides/herbicides, biomedical waste, orradon under the No Action. Overall, impacts to human health and safety are expected to be less thansignificant. Continued implementation of regulatory and administrative mitigation measures isexpected to reduce the potential impacts to human health and safety to less than significant.5.5.9.2.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionNo ImpactsNo change in the Soldier population would occur. No range construction projects are currentlyplanned. Consequently, no impacts are expected to human health and safety.5.5.9.2.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsAmmunition. Live-fire exercises would continue at current levels as a part of current force training.Continued use of munitions by current forces during training could affect the training lands. UnderFebruary 2008 5-221 2/25th SBCT Final EIS
- Page 484 and 485: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 486 and 487: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 488 and 489: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 490 and 491: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 492 and 493: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 494 and 495: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 496 and 497: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 498 and 499: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 500 and 501: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 502 and 503: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 504 and 505: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 506 and 507: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 508 and 509: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 510 and 511: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 512 and 513: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 514 and 515: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 516 and 517: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 518 and 519: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 520 and 521: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 522 and 523: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 524 and 525: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 526 and 527: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 528 and 529: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 530 and 531: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 532 and 533: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 536 and 537: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 538 and 539: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 540 and 541: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 542 and 543: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 544 and 545: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 546 and 547: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 548 and 549: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 550 and 551: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 552 and 553: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 554 and 555: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 556 and 557: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 558 and 559: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 560 and 561: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 562 and 563: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 564 and 565: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 566 and 567: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 568 and 569: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 570 and 571: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 572 and 573: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 574 and 575: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 576 and 577: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 578 and 579: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 580 and 581: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 582 and 583: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
Chapter 5 – Environmental ConsequencesUnexploded Ordnance. The quantity of ammunition <strong>us</strong>ed during training would remain roughly thesame as was analyzed in the 2004 <strong>EIS</strong> for Transformation of the 2/25 th ID (L). Therefore, no increasesin potential impacts from the presence of UXO are expected.Contaminated Sites. Training would continue at all existing training sites. The IRP investigations onSBMR, SBER, and WAAF would continue under existing USAG-HI protocol.Lead. Current force would continue live-fire training with lead-containing ammunition. Continuedammunition <strong>us</strong>e could increase the volume of soil that needs to be remediated for lead in the future.All live-fire activities that could present a source of lead contamination to the soils would becontained in the existing ordnance impact area, and no new ordnance impact areas would beintroduced. Ordnance clearance and cleanup would follow existing federal, state, and Army protocols.There would be no change to training operations at these installations.5.5.9.1.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsPetroleum, Oils, and Lubricants. The Army would continue to follow federal, state, and Armyprotocol. Wheeled vehicles would continue to be <strong>us</strong>ed by current forces in maneuver training onSBMR, DMR, KTA, and PTA. Consequently, the potential exists for spills of these products duringmaneuver training. However, continued implementation of regulatory and administrative mitigationmeasures is expected to limit the potential impacts to human health and safety to less than significant.5.5.9.2 Alaska5.5.9.2.1 Impacts from Cantonment ConstructionNo ImpactsNo change in the Soldier population would occur. Although construction of any required projectswould proceed as needed, no projects are currently planned. Consequently, no impacts are expected tohuman health and safety.No impacts would be expected from asbestos, LBP, PCBs, pesticides/herbicides, biomedical waste, orradon under the No Action. Overall, impacts to human health and safety are expected to be less thansignificant. Continued implementation of regulatory and administrative mitigation measures isexpected to reduce the potential impacts to human health and safety to less than significant.5.5.9.2.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionNo ImpactsNo change in the Soldier population would occur. No range construction projects are currentlyplanned. Consequently, no impacts are expected to human health and safety.5.5.9.2.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsAmmunition. Live-fire exercises would continue at current levels as a part of current force training.Continued <strong>us</strong>e of munitions by current forces during training could affect the training lands. UnderFebruary 2008 5-221 2/25th <strong>SBCT</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>