10.07.2015 Views

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5 – Environmental ConsequencesTable 5-60 Summary of Potential Hazardo<strong>us</strong> Material and Hazardo<strong>us</strong> WasteImpacts from Alternative DLocationHawaii Alaska ColoradoKTA/Activity Group SBMR DMR KLOA PTA FRA DTA FTC PCMSImpacts from CantonmentConstruction N/A N/A N/A N/A ☼ N/AImpacts from RangeConstruction☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ Impacts from Live-FireTrainingImpacts from ManeuverTraining☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ = Significant + = Beneficial Impact = Significant but mitigable to less than significant N/A = Not Applicable☼ = Less than Significant = No Impact5.5.9.1.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionLess Than Significant ImpactsUnder the No Action Alternative hazardo<strong>us</strong> materials would be generated through range maintenanceactivities. Soils contaminated with lead would be properly handled and re<strong>us</strong>ed to maintain berms.Hazardo<strong>us</strong> materials and wastes would continue to be managed in accordance with existing federal,state, installation-wide hazardo<strong>us</strong> materials management plans, the current Army protocols, andSOPs.Depleted Uranium. Ongoing remediation activities associated with the DU would continue underimplementation of the No Action Alternative. A comprehensive remediation strategy is beingdeveloped and implemented in consultation with the appropriate state and federal regulators.5.5.9.1.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsAmmunition. Live-fire exercises would continue as a part of meeting the training requirements of the2/25 th ID (L). Training would occur on existing ranges. Continued <strong>us</strong>e of munitions by during trainingcould affect the training lands. Under the No Action alternative, ammunition handling, storage, anddisposal would continue at current levels. Existing weapons would continue to be <strong>us</strong>ed as part ofcurrent force training. Range contamination would continue to accumulate until range closure andremedial cleanup, but there would be no increase in ammunition <strong>us</strong>ed, so there would be onlyconsistent levels of ongoing increased contamination. It is not likely that general training would resultin any significant impacts. Current force training would continue to follow existing USAG-HIprotocol.February 2008 5-220 2/25th <strong>SBCT</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!