SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

govsupport.us
from govsupport.us More from this publisher
10.07.2015 Views

Chapter 5 – Environmental Consequences5.5.7.1.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingNo ImpactsLive fire range use would not affect traffic or transportation resources away from the training areas.Consequently, impacts to traffic and transportation resources caused by live-fire training would not beexpected.5.5.7.1.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsUnder No Action, there would continue to be traffic impacts on public roadways associated withcurrent force activities. This would include convoy traffic on public roads that may periodically causetraffic congestion. Traffic conditions are currently operating at acceptable levels (LOS C). However,during certain periods, traffic congestion occurs on roads to WAAF and SBMR. Under thisalternative, the traffic volumes along the public roadways would remain at current levels, and theLOS would not change.Military vehicles traveling between the Army installations would continue to cross public roadways.Convoy frequency would not increase compared to current conditions. Because some of the trafficwould affect regional roadways that are currently operating at acceptable levels, impacts to traffic onpublic roadways are expected to be less than significant.5.5.7.2 Alaska5.5.7.2.1 Impacts from Cantonment ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers stationed at FRA would remain the same. Therefore, no additionalcantonment facilities would be constructed. Consequently, there would be no impacts to traffic ortransportation resources.5.5.7.2.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers training at FRA and DTA would remain the same and no additionalranges would be constructed. Consequently, there would be no new impacts to traffic ortransportation resources.5.5.7.2.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsThe number of required live-fire user days per year at FRA would continue at current levels. Thus,impacts to transportation resources and traffic caused by live-fire training would remain at less thansignificant levels.February 2008 5-214 2/25th SBCT Final EIS

Chapter 5 – Environmental Consequences5.5.7.2.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsManeuver training intensity and frequency at FRA and DTA would remain at levels seen today. Thus,impacts to transportation resources and traffic caused by maneuver training would remain at less thansignificant levels.5.5.7.3 Colorado5.5.7.3.1 Impacts from Cantonment ConstructionLess Than Significant ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers stationed and training at FTC and PCMS would remain the same.However, some additional cantonment facilities would be constructed to meet the needs of theunaccompanied Soldiers that are currently housed off post. Construction of these projects wouldgenerate additional traffic from worker vehicles and trucks, but construction traffic would betemporary. The impacts are expected to be less than significant and no mitigation would be required.5.5.7.3.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers stationed and training at FTC and PCMS would remain the same.Therefore, no additional range facilities would be constructed. Consequently, there would be noimpacts to traffic or transportation resources.5.5.7.3.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsThe number of required live-fire user days per year at FTC would continue at current levels. Noadditional impacts to traffic or transportation resources would occur. Consequently, impacts to trafficand transportation resources would be less than significant. No live-fire training occurs at PCMS, sono impacts would occur at PCMS.5.5.7.3.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingSignificant Impacts Mitigable To Less Than SignificantImpact 1: Intersection and Roadway Segment Operations. Maneuver training intensity and frequencyat FTC and PCMS would remain at levels seen today. Some of the traffic would affect regionalroadways that are currently operating at or near capacity. In particular, traffic from trainingdeployments could adversely affect traffic on I-25 through Pueblo. Impacts to traffic on publicroadways are expected to be significant, but mitigable to less than significant.Regulatory and Administrative Mitigation 1: Impacts to the regional roadway network from trainingdeployment convoys would be mitigated by scheduling all movements to occur during off-peak trafficperiods through Pueblo and staggering convoy vehicles into groups of no more than 24 vehicles eachthat are spaced at least 15 minutes apart. Improvements to the SH 16/I-25 interchange (currentlyunderway) and the addition of passing lanes on U.S. 160 and U.S. 350 were recommended in theFebruary 2008 5-215 2/25th SBCT Final EIS

Chapter 5 – Environmental Consequences5.5.7.1.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingNo ImpactsLive fire range <strong>us</strong>e would not affect traffic or transportation resources away from the training areas.Consequently, impacts to traffic and transportation resources ca<strong>us</strong>ed by live-fire training would not beexpected.5.5.7.1.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsUnder No Action, there would continue to be traffic impacts on public roadways associated withcurrent force activities. This would include convoy traffic on public roads that may periodically ca<strong>us</strong>etraffic congestion. Traffic conditions are currently operating at acceptable levels (LOS C). However,during certain periods, traffic congestion occurs on roads to WAAF and SBMR. Under thisalternative, the traffic volumes along the public roadways would remain at current levels, and theLOS would not change.Military vehicles traveling between the Army installations would continue to cross public roadways.Convoy frequency would not increase compared to current conditions. Beca<strong>us</strong>e some of the trafficwould affect regional roadways that are currently operating at acceptable levels, impacts to traffic onpublic roadways are expected to be less than significant.5.5.7.2 Alaska5.5.7.2.1 Impacts from Cantonment ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers stationed at FRA would remain the same. Therefore, no additionalcantonment facilities would be constructed. Consequently, there would be no impacts to traffic ortransportation resources.5.5.7.2.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers training at FRA and DTA would remain the same and no additionalranges would be constructed. Consequently, there would be no new impacts to traffic ortransportation resources.5.5.7.2.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsThe number of required live-fire <strong>us</strong>er days per year at FRA would continue at current levels. Th<strong>us</strong>,impacts to transportation resources and traffic ca<strong>us</strong>ed by live-fire training would remain at less thansignificant levels.February 2008 5-214 2/25th <strong>SBCT</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!