SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us
SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us
Chapter 5 – Environmental Consequences5.5.7.1.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingNo ImpactsLive fire range use would not affect traffic or transportation resources away from the training areas.Consequently, impacts to traffic and transportation resources caused by live-fire training would not beexpected.5.5.7.1.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsUnder No Action, there would continue to be traffic impacts on public roadways associated withcurrent force activities. This would include convoy traffic on public roads that may periodically causetraffic congestion. Traffic conditions are currently operating at acceptable levels (LOS C). However,during certain periods, traffic congestion occurs on roads to WAAF and SBMR. Under thisalternative, the traffic volumes along the public roadways would remain at current levels, and theLOS would not change.Military vehicles traveling between the Army installations would continue to cross public roadways.Convoy frequency would not increase compared to current conditions. Because some of the trafficwould affect regional roadways that are currently operating at acceptable levels, impacts to traffic onpublic roadways are expected to be less than significant.5.5.7.2 Alaska5.5.7.2.1 Impacts from Cantonment ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers stationed at FRA would remain the same. Therefore, no additionalcantonment facilities would be constructed. Consequently, there would be no impacts to traffic ortransportation resources.5.5.7.2.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers training at FRA and DTA would remain the same and no additionalranges would be constructed. Consequently, there would be no new impacts to traffic ortransportation resources.5.5.7.2.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsThe number of required live-fire user days per year at FRA would continue at current levels. Thus,impacts to transportation resources and traffic caused by live-fire training would remain at less thansignificant levels.February 2008 5-214 2/25th SBCT Final EIS
Chapter 5 – Environmental Consequences5.5.7.2.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsManeuver training intensity and frequency at FRA and DTA would remain at levels seen today. Thus,impacts to transportation resources and traffic caused by maneuver training would remain at less thansignificant levels.5.5.7.3 Colorado5.5.7.3.1 Impacts from Cantonment ConstructionLess Than Significant ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers stationed and training at FTC and PCMS would remain the same.However, some additional cantonment facilities would be constructed to meet the needs of theunaccompanied Soldiers that are currently housed off post. Construction of these projects wouldgenerate additional traffic from worker vehicles and trucks, but construction traffic would betemporary. The impacts are expected to be less than significant and no mitigation would be required.5.5.7.3.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers stationed and training at FTC and PCMS would remain the same.Therefore, no additional range facilities would be constructed. Consequently, there would be noimpacts to traffic or transportation resources.5.5.7.3.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsThe number of required live-fire user days per year at FTC would continue at current levels. Noadditional impacts to traffic or transportation resources would occur. Consequently, impacts to trafficand transportation resources would be less than significant. No live-fire training occurs at PCMS, sono impacts would occur at PCMS.5.5.7.3.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingSignificant Impacts Mitigable To Less Than SignificantImpact 1: Intersection and Roadway Segment Operations. Maneuver training intensity and frequencyat FTC and PCMS would remain at levels seen today. Some of the traffic would affect regionalroadways that are currently operating at or near capacity. In particular, traffic from trainingdeployments could adversely affect traffic on I-25 through Pueblo. Impacts to traffic on publicroadways are expected to be significant, but mitigable to less than significant.Regulatory and Administrative Mitigation 1: Impacts to the regional roadway network from trainingdeployment convoys would be mitigated by scheduling all movements to occur during off-peak trafficperiods through Pueblo and staggering convoy vehicles into groups of no more than 24 vehicles eachthat are spaced at least 15 minutes apart. Improvements to the SH 16/I-25 interchange (currentlyunderway) and the addition of passing lanes on U.S. 160 and U.S. 350 were recommended in theFebruary 2008 5-215 2/25th SBCT Final EIS
- Page 478 and 479: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 480 and 481: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 482 and 483: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 484 and 485: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 486 and 487: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 488 and 489: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 490 and 491: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 492 and 493: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 494 and 495: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 496 and 497: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 498 and 499: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 500 and 501: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 502 and 503: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 504 and 505: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 506 and 507: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 508 and 509: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 510 and 511: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 512 and 513: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 514 and 515: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 516 and 517: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 518 and 519: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 520 and 521: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 522 and 523: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 524 and 525: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 526 and 527: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 530 and 531: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 532 and 533: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 534 and 535: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 536 and 537: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 538 and 539: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 540 and 541: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 542 and 543: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 544 and 545: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 546 and 547: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 548 and 549: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 550 and 551: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 552 and 553: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 554 and 555: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 556 and 557: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 558 and 559: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 560 and 561: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 562 and 563: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 564 and 565: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 566 and 567: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 568 and 569: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 570 and 571: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 572 and 573: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 574 and 575: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 576 and 577: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
Chapter 5 – Environmental Consequences5.5.7.1.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingNo ImpactsLive fire range <strong>us</strong>e would not affect traffic or transportation resources away from the training areas.Consequently, impacts to traffic and transportation resources ca<strong>us</strong>ed by live-fire training would not beexpected.5.5.7.1.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsUnder No Action, there would continue to be traffic impacts on public roadways associated withcurrent force activities. This would include convoy traffic on public roads that may periodically ca<strong>us</strong>etraffic congestion. Traffic conditions are currently operating at acceptable levels (LOS C). However,during certain periods, traffic congestion occurs on roads to WAAF and SBMR. Under thisalternative, the traffic volumes along the public roadways would remain at current levels, and theLOS would not change.Military vehicles traveling between the Army installations would continue to cross public roadways.Convoy frequency would not increase compared to current conditions. Beca<strong>us</strong>e some of the trafficwould affect regional roadways that are currently operating at acceptable levels, impacts to traffic onpublic roadways are expected to be less than significant.5.5.7.2 Alaska5.5.7.2.1 Impacts from Cantonment ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers stationed at FRA would remain the same. Therefore, no additionalcantonment facilities would be constructed. Consequently, there would be no impacts to traffic ortransportation resources.5.5.7.2.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers training at FRA and DTA would remain the same and no additionalranges would be constructed. Consequently, there would be no new impacts to traffic ortransportation resources.5.5.7.2.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsThe number of required live-fire <strong>us</strong>er days per year at FRA would continue at current levels. Th<strong>us</strong>,impacts to transportation resources and traffic ca<strong>us</strong>ed by live-fire training would remain at less thansignificant levels.February 2008 5-214 2/25th <strong>SBCT</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>