SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

Chapter 5 – Environmental Consequencescontinue. Continuing noise, dust, or other indirect effects outside the installation boundaries couldpreclude locating residences or other sensitive receptors in these areas in the future. Consequently,impacts to land use and recreation caused by live-fire training would be less than significant.5.5.7 Traffic and TransportationTable 5-58 lists the potential impacts associated with traffic and transportation resource underimplementation of Alternative D. Under the No Action Alternative, the 2/25 th SBCT would not bestationed at any of the alternative locations, and therefore no SBCT-specific impacts to traffic andtransportation resources would occur. Impacts are summarized in the following subsections for eachlocation.Table 5-58 Summary of Potential Traffic and Transportation Impacts fromAlternative DLocationHawaii Alaska ColoradoKTA/Activity Group SBMR DMR KLOA PTA FRA DTA FTC PCMSImpacts from CantonmentConstruction N/A N/A N/A N/A ☼ N/AImpacts from RangeConstruction N/A N/A Impacts from Live-FireTraining ☼ ☼ ☼ Impacts from ManeuverTraining☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ = Significant + = Beneficial Impact = Significant but mitigable to less than significant N/A = Not Applicable☼ = Less than Significant= No Impact5.5.7.1 Hawaii5.5.7.1.1 Impacts from Cantonment ConstructionSome non-Stryker construction such as barracks renovations and maintenance activities would occuras planned. These activities are not anticipated to affect traffic patterns or volume of traffic flow, andthey would not require adjustments to existing roadways and transportation networks.No Impacts5.5.7.1.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionThere would be no anticipated impacts to traffic anticipated with the maintenance of existing rangesto include maintenance of targetry, berms, trails and stream crossings. No mitigation would berequired.February 2008 5-213 2/25th SBCT Final EIS