10.07.2015 Views

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5 – Environmental ConsequencesRegulatory and Administrative Mitigation 1: The installations would continue to inventory andevaluate cultural resources in compliance with Section 110 of the NHPA, and project planning wouldcomply with Section 106 and its implementing regulations. The locations of eligible culturalresources or areas considered likely to contain eligible cultural resources would be designated assensitive areas, and access to or <strong>us</strong>e of these areas would be restricted and monitored. There would beregular monitoring of known sites by cultural resource personnel after training activities to identifyany impacts and adj<strong>us</strong>t protection if needed. If any sites cannot be avoided, appropriate mitigationmeasures that may include data recovery would be implemented. Any construction or maintenancethat entails ground disturbance would also be monitored, and any discovery of undocumented culturalresources or human remains would be treated in accordance with installation guidelines and policies.5.5.6 Land Use and RecreationTable 5-57 lists the potential impacts associated with land <strong>us</strong>e and recreation under implementationof Alternative D. The 2/25 th <strong>SBCT</strong> would not be stationed at any of the alternative locations. The NoAction Alternative assumes existing land <strong>us</strong>e as a baseline condition for analysis. Therefore, no<strong>SBCT</strong>-specific impacts to land <strong>us</strong>e and recreation would occur. Impacts are summarized in thefollowing subsections for each location.Table 5-57 Summary of Potential Land Use and Recreation Impacts fromAlternative DLocationHawaii Alaska ColoradoKTA/Activity Group SBMR DMR KLOA PTA FRA DTA FTC PCMSImpacts from CantonmentConstruction N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AImpacts from RangeConstruction☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ Impacts from Live-FireTraining☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ Impacts from ManeuverTraining☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ = Significant + = Beneficial Impact = Significant but mitigable to less than significant N/A = Not Applicable☼ = Less than Significant = No Impact5.5.6.1 Hawaii5.5.6.1.1 Impacts from Cantonment ConstructionNo ImpactSome non-Stryker construction such as barracks renovations and maintenance activities would occuras planned. These activities do not affect new land or the <strong>us</strong>e of the land. Impacts range constructionare anticipated to have no impact on land <strong>us</strong>e and recreation.February 2008 5-210 2/25th <strong>SBCT</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!