SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

govsupport.us
from govsupport.us More from this publisher
10.07.2015 Views

Chapter 5 – Environmental Consequences5.5.4.3.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers stationed and training at FTC and PCMS would remain the same.Therefore, no additional range facilities would be constructed. Consequently, there would be noimpacts to wildfire risk or wildfire management.5.5.4.3.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsThe number of required live-fire user days per year at FTC would be near current levels.Implementation of the Prescribed Burn Plan and other wildfire management programs wouldcontinue. Therefore, no additional wildfire risk is expected, and the overall impacts to firemanagement would be less than significant. No live-fire training occurs at PCMS, so no impactswould occur at PCMS.5.5.4.3.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsManeuver training intensity and frequency at FTC and PCMS would remain at levels seen today.Implementation of the Prescribed Burn Plan and other wildfire management programs wouldcontinue. Therefore, no additional wildfire risk is expected, and the overall impacts to firemanagement would be less than significant.5.5.5 Cultural ResourcesTable 5-56 summarizes the types of impacts to cultural resources that would occur under AlternativeD. Impacts would result from ongoing training activities and infrastructure projects. Existing brigadesat each in Alaska and Colorado would remain in their current configuration at their current trooplevels. The 2/25 th ID (L) would be assumed to be in Hawaii with the other units of USAG-HI underthis alternative. Only at FTC would there be any cantonment construction to accommodate currenttroop levels and that construction would be limited. There would also be no need for new rangeconstruction, although existing projects for range improvements would continue. Ongoing trainingactivities would include continued off-road vehicle use, which would result in impacts on culturalresources in the training areas caused by ground troop activities, off-road vehicle movement, andground disturbance.5.5.5.1 Hawaii5.5.5.1.1 Impacts from cantonment constructionNo ImpactsSome non-Stryker construction such as barracks renovations and maintenance activities would occuras planned. No impacts to cultural resources would be anticipated from cantonment construction.No new construction footprints would be disturbed and no increased cultural resources impacts areexpected.February 2008 5-206 2/25th SBCT Final EIS

Chapter 5 – Environmental ConsequencesTable 5-56 Summary of Potential Cultural Resources Impacts from Alternative DLocationHawaii Alaska ColoradoKTA/Activity Group SBMR DMR KLOA PTA FRA DTA FTC PCMSImpacts from CantonmentConstruction N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AImpacts from RangeConstruction☼ ☼ ☼ Impacts from Live-FireTraining Impacts from ManeuverTraining = Significant + = Beneficial Impact = Significant but mitigable to less than significant N/A = Not Applicable☼ = Less than Significant = No Impact5.5.5.1.2 Impacts from range constructionLess Than Significant ImpactsRange maintenance would continue as needed. This would include berm, trail and targetrymaintenance and would temporarily increase human presence and activity at range sites. All existingareas of range and support facility construction have been surveyed for cultural resources. The annualreport lists cultural resource sites documented since 2003. To date, all of the sites identified duringpedestrian survey before commencement of UXO clearance have been avoided during range designand layout of the construction footprint.5.5.5.1.3 Impacts from Live-fire TrainingNo ImpactsExisting conditions would continue at all of the training areas. There would be no project-relatedincrease in frequency or intensity of training, no use of new ranges, and no change in weapons orequipment. All of the areas of live-fire training have been surveyed for cultural resources andprotective measures have been implemented for all known sites.5.5.5.1.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingSignificant Impacts Mitigable To Less Than SignificantImpact 1: Impacts to cultural resources: In Hawaii, the 2/25 th ID (L) would be stationed at SBMRand train at maneuver training areas in USAG-HI. Impacts to maneuver areas would result insignificant but mitigable impacts on cultural resources in the maneuver areas caused by ground troopactivities, off-road vehicle movement, and ground disturbance. The 2/25 th ID (L) is projected to haveless impact than either an SBCT or a modular IBCT and would be conducting maneuvers in existingmaneuver areas that have been used to support maneuver training. There would be no incrementalincrease in impacts on cultural resources. Mechanisms and procedures are in place to monitor theFebruary 2008 5-207 2/25th SBCT Final EIS

Chapter 5 – Environmental Consequences5.5.4.3.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers stationed and training at FTC and PCMS would remain the same.Therefore, no additional range facilities would be constructed. Consequently, there would be noimpacts to wildfire risk or wildfire management.5.5.4.3.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsThe number of required live-fire <strong>us</strong>er days per year at FTC would be near current levels.Implementation of the Prescribed Burn Plan and other wildfire management programs wouldcontinue. Therefore, no additional wildfire risk is expected, and the overall impacts to firemanagement would be less than significant. No live-fire training occurs at PCMS, so no impactswould occur at PCMS.5.5.4.3.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsManeuver training intensity and frequency at FTC and PCMS would remain at levels seen today.Implementation of the Prescribed Burn Plan and other wildfire management programs wouldcontinue. Therefore, no additional wildfire risk is expected, and the overall impacts to firemanagement would be less than significant.5.5.5 Cultural ResourcesTable 5-56 summarizes the types of impacts to cultural resources that would occur under AlternativeD. Impacts would result from ongoing training activities and infrastructure projects. Existing brigadesat each in Alaska and Colorado would remain in their current configuration at their current trooplevels. The 2/25 th ID (L) would be assumed to be in Hawaii with the other units of USAG-HI underthis alternative. Only at FTC would there be any cantonment construction to accommodate currenttroop levels and that construction would be limited. There would also be no need for new rangeconstruction, although existing projects for range improvements would continue. Ongoing trainingactivities would include continued off-road vehicle <strong>us</strong>e, which would result in impacts on culturalresources in the training areas ca<strong>us</strong>ed by ground troop activities, off-road vehicle movement, andground disturbance.5.5.5.1 Hawaii5.5.5.1.1 Impacts from cantonment constructionNo ImpactsSome non-Stryker construction such as barracks renovations and maintenance activities would occuras planned. No impacts to cultural resources would be anticipated from cantonment construction.No new construction footprints would be disturbed and no increased cultural resources impacts areexpected.February 2008 5-206 2/25th <strong>SBCT</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!