SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us
SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us
Chapter 5 – Environmental Consequences5.5.4.3.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers stationed and training at FTC and PCMS would remain the same.Therefore, no additional range facilities would be constructed. Consequently, there would be noimpacts to wildfire risk or wildfire management.5.5.4.3.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsThe number of required live-fire user days per year at FTC would be near current levels.Implementation of the Prescribed Burn Plan and other wildfire management programs wouldcontinue. Therefore, no additional wildfire risk is expected, and the overall impacts to firemanagement would be less than significant. No live-fire training occurs at PCMS, so no impactswould occur at PCMS.5.5.4.3.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsManeuver training intensity and frequency at FTC and PCMS would remain at levels seen today.Implementation of the Prescribed Burn Plan and other wildfire management programs wouldcontinue. Therefore, no additional wildfire risk is expected, and the overall impacts to firemanagement would be less than significant.5.5.5 Cultural ResourcesTable 5-56 summarizes the types of impacts to cultural resources that would occur under AlternativeD. Impacts would result from ongoing training activities and infrastructure projects. Existing brigadesat each in Alaska and Colorado would remain in their current configuration at their current trooplevels. The 2/25 th ID (L) would be assumed to be in Hawaii with the other units of USAG-HI underthis alternative. Only at FTC would there be any cantonment construction to accommodate currenttroop levels and that construction would be limited. There would also be no need for new rangeconstruction, although existing projects for range improvements would continue. Ongoing trainingactivities would include continued off-road vehicle use, which would result in impacts on culturalresources in the training areas caused by ground troop activities, off-road vehicle movement, andground disturbance.5.5.5.1 Hawaii5.5.5.1.1 Impacts from cantonment constructionNo ImpactsSome non-Stryker construction such as barracks renovations and maintenance activities would occuras planned. No impacts to cultural resources would be anticipated from cantonment construction.No new construction footprints would be disturbed and no increased cultural resources impacts areexpected.February 2008 5-206 2/25th SBCT Final EIS
Chapter 5 – Environmental ConsequencesTable 5-56 Summary of Potential Cultural Resources Impacts from Alternative DLocationHawaii Alaska ColoradoKTA/Activity Group SBMR DMR KLOA PTA FRA DTA FTC PCMSImpacts from CantonmentConstruction N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AImpacts from RangeConstruction☼ ☼ ☼ Impacts from Live-FireTraining Impacts from ManeuverTraining = Significant + = Beneficial Impact = Significant but mitigable to less than significant N/A = Not Applicable☼ = Less than Significant = No Impact5.5.5.1.2 Impacts from range constructionLess Than Significant ImpactsRange maintenance would continue as needed. This would include berm, trail and targetrymaintenance and would temporarily increase human presence and activity at range sites. All existingareas of range and support facility construction have been surveyed for cultural resources. The annualreport lists cultural resource sites documented since 2003. To date, all of the sites identified duringpedestrian survey before commencement of UXO clearance have been avoided during range designand layout of the construction footprint.5.5.5.1.3 Impacts from Live-fire TrainingNo ImpactsExisting conditions would continue at all of the training areas. There would be no project-relatedincrease in frequency or intensity of training, no use of new ranges, and no change in weapons orequipment. All of the areas of live-fire training have been surveyed for cultural resources andprotective measures have been implemented for all known sites.5.5.5.1.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingSignificant Impacts Mitigable To Less Than SignificantImpact 1: Impacts to cultural resources: In Hawaii, the 2/25 th ID (L) would be stationed at SBMRand train at maneuver training areas in USAG-HI. Impacts to maneuver areas would result insignificant but mitigable impacts on cultural resources in the maneuver areas caused by ground troopactivities, off-road vehicle movement, and ground disturbance. The 2/25 th ID (L) is projected to haveless impact than either an SBCT or a modular IBCT and would be conducting maneuvers in existingmaneuver areas that have been used to support maneuver training. There would be no incrementalincrease in impacts on cultural resources. Mechanisms and procedures are in place to monitor theFebruary 2008 5-207 2/25th SBCT Final EIS
- Page 470 and 471: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 472 and 473: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 474 and 475: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 476 and 477: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 478 and 479: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 480 and 481: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 482 and 483: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 484 and 485: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 486 and 487: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 488 and 489: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 490 and 491: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 492 and 493: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 494 and 495: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 496 and 497: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 498 and 499: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 500 and 501: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 502 and 503: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 504 and 505: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 506 and 507: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 508 and 509: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 510 and 511: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 512 and 513: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 514 and 515: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 516 and 517: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 518 and 519: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 522 and 523: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 524 and 525: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 526 and 527: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 528 and 529: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 530 and 531: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 532 and 533: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 534 and 535: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 536 and 537: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 538 and 539: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 540 and 541: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 542 and 543: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 544 and 545: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 546 and 547: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 548 and 549: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 550 and 551: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 552 and 553: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 554 and 555: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 556 and 557: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 558 and 559: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 560 and 561: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 562 and 563: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 564 and 565: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 566 and 567: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
- Page 568 and 569: Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequen
Chapter 5 – Environmental Consequences5.5.4.3.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers stationed and training at FTC and PCMS would remain the same.Therefore, no additional range facilities would be constructed. Consequently, there would be noimpacts to wildfire risk or wildfire management.5.5.4.3.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsThe number of required live-fire <strong>us</strong>er days per year at FTC would be near current levels.Implementation of the Prescribed Burn Plan and other wildfire management programs wouldcontinue. Therefore, no additional wildfire risk is expected, and the overall impacts to firemanagement would be less than significant. No live-fire training occurs at PCMS, so no impactswould occur at PCMS.5.5.4.3.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsManeuver training intensity and frequency at FTC and PCMS would remain at levels seen today.Implementation of the Prescribed Burn Plan and other wildfire management programs wouldcontinue. Therefore, no additional wildfire risk is expected, and the overall impacts to firemanagement would be less than significant.5.5.5 Cultural ResourcesTable 5-56 summarizes the types of impacts to cultural resources that would occur under AlternativeD. Impacts would result from ongoing training activities and infrastructure projects. Existing brigadesat each in Alaska and Colorado would remain in their current configuration at their current trooplevels. The 2/25 th ID (L) would be assumed to be in Hawaii with the other units of USAG-HI underthis alternative. Only at FTC would there be any cantonment construction to accommodate currenttroop levels and that construction would be limited. There would also be no need for new rangeconstruction, although existing projects for range improvements would continue. Ongoing trainingactivities would include continued off-road vehicle <strong>us</strong>e, which would result in impacts on culturalresources in the training areas ca<strong>us</strong>ed by ground troop activities, off-road vehicle movement, andground disturbance.5.5.5.1 Hawaii5.5.5.1.1 Impacts from cantonment constructionNo ImpactsSome non-Stryker construction such as barracks renovations and maintenance activities would occuras planned. No impacts to cultural resources would be anticipated from cantonment construction.No new construction footprints would be disturbed and no increased cultural resources impacts areexpected.February 2008 5-206 2/25th <strong>SBCT</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>