10.07.2015 Views

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5 – Environmental Consequences5.5.2.2 Alaska5.5.2.2.1 Impacts from Cantonment ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers stationed at FRA would remain the same. Therefore, no additionalcantonment facilities would be constructed. Consequently, there would be no soil erosion impactsassociated with the No Action Alternative.5.5.2.2.2 Impacts from Range ConstructionNo ImpactsThe current number of Soldiers training at FRA and DTA would remain the same. Therefore, noadditional ranges would be constructed. Consequently, there would be no soil erosion impactsassociated with the No Action Alternative.5.5.2.2.3 Impacts from Live-Fire TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsThe number of required live-fire <strong>us</strong>er days per year at FRA would be near current levels.Implementation of the USARAK INRMP and ITAM program work plans and associated landmanagement practices and soil erosion mitigation would continue. Soil erosion-related impactsca<strong>us</strong>ed by live-fire training would be less than significant.5.5.2.2.4 Impacts from Maneuver TrainingLess Than Significant ImpactsManeuver training intensity and frequency at FRA and DTA would remain at levels seen today.Implementation of the USARAK INRMP and ITAM program work plans and associated landmanagement practices and soil erosion mitigation would continue. Soil erosion-related impactsca<strong>us</strong>ed by maneuver training would be less than significant.5.5.2.3 Colorado5.5.2.3.1 Impacts from Cantonment ConstructionLess Than Significant ImpactsThe number of Soldiers currently stationed at FTC would remain the same. However, someunaccompanied Soldiers live off post beca<strong>us</strong>e of an on-post shortage barracks. Therefore, someadditional cantonment facilities would be constructed under this alternative to meet the needs of theunaccompanied Soldiers. Although this construction is expected to occur in previo<strong>us</strong>ly disturbedareas, less than significant soil erosion impacts would occur.February 2008 5-198 2/25th <strong>SBCT</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!