SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us
SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us
Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and NeedAnother important consideration is the need to station adequate forces in the Pacific Ocean area ofoperations. Since the 2/25 th SBCT was originally designated for Hawaii, it became part of the mix offorces available to the Pacific Combatant Commander. The permanent stationing decision for the2/25 th SBCT must maintain adequate forces in the Pacific. This allows Pacific Command to meet itsrequirements, which include regional rapid response, deterrence, disaster assistance, and other contingencymissions.1.2.1.13 Summary of NeedThe need for action for permanently stationing the 2/25 th SBCT centers on the five primary areas ofneed discussed previously. These areas of need include:• Adhering to national security and defense policy.• Furthering Army Transformation as directed by the QDR and ACP.• Meeting training and operational requirements for the SBCT (including garrison operations).• Providing for Soldier and Family quality of life requirements.• Meeting strategic deployment requirements to ensure adequate defense assets can be deployed ina timely manner to support national security requirements worldwide.1.3 PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED ACTIONThe purpose of the Proposed Action is to station the 2/25 th SBCT permanently at an installation that isable to meet the SBCT’s training, Soldier and Family quality of life, and operational and strategic requirements.The installation must be capable of providing adequate training ranges for maneuver andlive-fire training. The installation must also be able to provide the support infrastructure necessary toprovide a high quality of life for Soldiers and their Families and support garrison-based operations ofthe SBCT. In addition, the stationing action must provide for the National Security requirements outlinedin the NSS, NDS, and QDR and provide the necessary strategic response capabilities to satisfynational security requirements and obligations.1.4 OTHER ARMY INITIATIVES REQUIRING CONSIDERATION(BRAC, GDPR, MODULARITY)As discussed in Section 1.2, the purpose of and need for the permanent stationing of the 2/25 th SBCTmust also take into account previously announced Army initiatives and directed actions. In particular,actions that affect the range of alternatives that may be considered in this document are affected byBRAC legislation passed in 2005, GDPR, and Army directives to convert its forces to standardizedmodular structure. Each of these initiatives is discussed in detail below.1.4.1 BRAC 2005In 2005, Congress approved the recommendations of the BRAC Commission, pursuant to BRAC.This particular round of realignment and closures was designed to provide the necessary infrastructureto support Army transformation, including GDPR, the ACP, and conversion to a modular forcestructure. This in turn is designed to transition the Army from a force capable of countering Cold WarEra threats to one that is capable of executing a broad range of missions.BRAC directs the Army to close excess installations with the intention of disposal while realigningand reconfiguring the Army’s infrastructure. This allows the Army to reallocate resources fromFebruary 2008 1-11 2/25th SBCT Final EIS
Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and Needclosed installations to other high-priority locations. It also allows the Army to optimize the operationalcapacity necessary to support warfighting capabilities and enhance the opportunities for jointactivities. Among other things, BRAC will optimize military value, advance the Army Modular Force(AMF) conversion, accommodate the re-stationing of overseas units, enable the transformation ofboth the active and reserve components, rebalance the force structure, and contribute to joint operations.In terms of impacts on Army infrastructure, BRAC includes 12 major base closures, six major realignments,and the closure of 211 National Guard and 176 Reserve facilities. BRAC is inextricablytied to Army transformation. The closure and realignment of forces are directed by Congress throughthe BRAC Commission’s recommendations and are, therefore, non-discretionary. Installations closingor realigning are preparing separate site-specific NEPA documentation to implement BRAC directives,but the Congressional decision with regard to the list of installations to be closed or realignedis not subject to NEPA as a matter of law. BRAC recommendations affect the number of sitesavailable for home stationing of the 2/25 th and this EIS has considered its mandates and effects whenevaluating potential alternative stationing locations for the 2/25 th SBCT.1.4.2 Global Defense Posture and RealignmentThe U.S.’ global defense posture is characterized by the size, locations, types, and roles of forwardmilitary forces. In the past, the Army has depended heavily on its forward-based presence in the Pacificand in Europe to project power and undertake military actions overseas. Transformation andQDR directives provide guidance to restructure the military for rapid deployment from within theU.S. while reducing the presence in, and reliance of U.S. forces on, foreign nations. As part of theoverall transformation effort, the Army is in the process of realigning 44,500 Soldiers back to theU.S. between 2004 and 2011 and downsizing overseas facilities to support the expeditionary visioncontained within the QDR.Although the U.S. will retain some transformed, forward-positioned forces in Europe and Korea,many Soldiers and their units will be realigned to Army installations in the U.S. This realignment willcreate a greater demand on training ranges and facilities at these installations. The strategy will enablethe Army to restructure in a manner that enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of response toemerging threats. The decisions of the GDPR are assumed to be part of the baseline environment foralternatives analysis conducted within this document. Since initial GDPR announcements, the Armyhas decided to activate and retain two HBCTs in Germany to meet the increased mission requirementsof the European Command (EUCOM). The return of these Brigades to the U.S. has been delayed until2012 and 2013 as was discussed in the ROD for Army Growth and Force Structure Realignment(Army 2007c).1.4.3 Army Modular Force (AMF)The Army has embarked on a 30-year process to transform its forces. This transformation includesthe modernization of its doctrine, equipment, leadership, organizational structure, facilities, businessprocesses, and virtually every component of its operations. As part of its overall transformation effort,the Army has decided to transition to a modular or standardized force structure at all levels of its organization.This process of modular standardization means a transition of the Army from large powerful,fixed organizations constituted at the Division level to an Army designed around smaller, selfcontained,logistically supportable BCTs. The units within these BCTs will be identical in theirequipment and manning. The modular initiative allows for greater levels of planning and organizationalefficiency.February 2008 1-12 2/25th SBCT Final EIS
- Page 1 and 2: FinalEnvironmentalImpactStatementPe
- Page 3 and 4: February 15, 2008Re:Release and rev
- Page 5: Final Environmental Impact Statemen
- Page 8 and 9: PrefaceAcronyms and Abbreviations u
- Page 10 and 11: PrefaceERFEagle River FlatsESAEndan
- Page 12 and 13: PrefaceMSRMVCLNAAQSNAGPRANDAANDSNEP
- Page 14 and 15: PrefaceTCPTFTATIPTLVTMDLTNCTNTtpyTR
- Page 16 and 17: Executive SummaryAs discussed, thes
- Page 18 and 19: Executive Summarybrought forth thro
- Page 20 and 21: Executive Summary• Effects to Nat
- Page 22 and 23: Executive Summarydinate units and e
- Page 24 and 25: Executive SummaryThe stationing of
- Page 26 and 27: Executive SummarySummary of Direct
- Page 29 and 30: ContentsCHAPTER 1 PURPOSE, NEED, AN
- Page 31 and 32: Contents3.3.13 Energy..............
- Page 33 and 34: Contents5.3.15 Facilities..........
- Page 35 and 36: ContentsTable 5-13 Summary of Poten
- Page 37 and 38: ContentsAppendicesAppendix A Screen
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and Needstruc
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and Needports
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and NeedACP t
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and Needtions
- Page 47: Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and NeedAt th
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and Needpermi
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and Need• E
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and NeedThe r
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 59 and 60: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 61 and 62: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 65 and 66: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 73 and 74: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 85 and 86: !!( 3 !( 1 !( 1!(UAC!(AnchorageMPMG
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
- Page 95 and 96: ModelRes.OTERO CO.LAS ANIMAS CO.£
- Page 97 and 98: Chapter 2 ⎯ Description of the Pr
Chapter 1 ⎯ Purpose and NeedAnother important consideration is the need to station adequate forces in the Pacific Ocean area ofoperations. Since the 2/25 th <strong>SBCT</strong> was originally designated for Hawaii, it became part of the mix offorces available to the Pacific Combatant Commander. The permanent stationing decision for the2/25 th <strong>SBCT</strong> m<strong>us</strong>t maintain adequate forces in the Pacific. This allows Pacific Command to meet itsrequirements, which include regional rapid response, deterrence, disaster assistance, and other contingencymissions.1.2.1.13 Summary of NeedThe need for action for permanently stationing the 2/25 th <strong>SBCT</strong> centers on the five primary areas ofneed disc<strong>us</strong>sed previo<strong>us</strong>ly. These areas of need include:• Adhering to national security and defense policy.• Furthering Army Transformation as directed by the QDR and ACP.• Meeting training and operational requirements for the <strong>SBCT</strong> (including garrison operations).• Providing for Soldier and Family quality of life requirements.• Meeting strategic deployment requirements to ensure adequate defense assets can be deployed ina timely manner to support national security requirements worldwide.1.3 PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED ACTIONThe purpose of the Proposed Action is to station the 2/25 th <strong>SBCT</strong> permanently at an installation that isable to meet the <strong>SBCT</strong>’s training, Soldier and Family quality of life, and operational and strategic requirements.The installation m<strong>us</strong>t be capable of providing adequate training ranges for maneuver andlive-fire training. The installation m<strong>us</strong>t also be able to provide the support infrastructure necessary toprovide a high quality of life for Soldiers and their Families and support garrison-based operations ofthe <strong>SBCT</strong>. In addition, the stationing action m<strong>us</strong>t provide for the National Security requirements outlinedin the NSS, NDS, and QDR and provide the necessary strategic response capabilities to satisfynational security requirements and obligations.1.4 OTHER ARMY INITIATIVES REQUIRING CONSIDERATION(BRAC, GDPR, MODULARITY)As disc<strong>us</strong>sed in Section 1.2, the purpose of and need for the permanent stationing of the 2/25 th <strong>SBCT</strong>m<strong>us</strong>t also take into account previo<strong>us</strong>ly announced Army initiatives and directed actions. In particular,actions that affect the range of alternatives that may be considered in this document are affected byBRAC legislation passed in 2005, GDPR, and Army directives to convert its forces to standardizedmodular structure. Each of these initiatives is disc<strong>us</strong>sed in detail below.1.4.1 BRAC 2005In 2005, Congress approved the recommendations of the BRAC Commission, pursuant to BRAC.This particular round of realignment and closures was designed to provide the necessary infrastructureto support Army transformation, including GDPR, the ACP, and conversion to a modular forcestructure. This in turn is designed to transition the Army from a force capable of countering Cold WarEra threats to one that is capable of executing a broad range of missions.BRAC directs the Army to close excess installations with the intention of disposal while realigningand reconfiguring the Army’s infrastructure. This allows the Army to reallocate resources fromFebruary 2008 1-11 2/25th <strong>SBCT</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>