10.07.2015 Views

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5 – Environmental ConsequencesTable 5-43Summary of Potential Impacts to Socioeconomics, EnvironmentalJ<strong>us</strong>tice, and Protection of Children from Alternative CLocationActivity Group Fort Carson PCMSImpacts from Cantonment Construction ☼ N/AImpacts from Range Construction ☼ N/AImpacts from Live-Fire Training ☼ N/AImpacts from Maneuver Training ☼ ☼ = Significant + = Beneficial Impact = Significant but mitigable to less than significant N/A = Not Applicable= Less than Significant☼= No ImpactTable 5-44Direct sales volumeInduced sales volumeTotal sales volumeDirect incomeInduced incomeTotal incomeDirect employmentInduced employmentTotal employmentLocal populationLocal off-base populationEIFS Construction Model Output for Fort Carson, ColoradoIndicator Variable Project Change Percent Change RTV$6,565,568$6,959,502$13,525,070 0.11% -8.6 % % to 17.37 %$20,597,860$1,448,820$22,046,680 0.29% -7.68 % to 17.37 %59843641 0.38% -3.61 % to 10.06 %1,387693 0.55% -2.06 % to 5.49 %These analyses indicate that the changes in sales volume (0.11 percent), income (0.29 percent), employment (0.38percent), and population (0.55 percent) are well within the respective RTVs of 17.37 percent, 17.37 percent, 10.06percent, and 5.49 percent.Source: EIFS Model 20075.4.8.1 Impacts from Cantonment ConstructionNo cantonment construction would be required at FTC initially to accommodate the addition of 663Soldiers, their families, support personnel, and <strong>SBCT</strong>-specific facilities associated with the permanentstationing of the 2/25 th <strong>SBCT</strong> at FTC. Most needed facilities are already planned as part of theArmy’s transformation at FTC. In comparison to the existing population of FTC, this increase inpersonnel and associated facilities needs would not be significantly different than the current needs atFTC. However, all unaccompanied Soldiers associated with the <strong>SBCT</strong> (estimated at 200 to 300Soldiers) would be stationed off-post until currently needed and planned barracks are built. Also,temporarily, Stryker vehicles would be parked in vacant fields within the cantonment area until afuture date when permanent parking would be developed.February 2008 5-156 2/25th <strong>SBCT</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!