SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

ContentsTable 5-59 Summary of Potential Socioeconomic Impacts from Alternative D............................5-216Table 5-60 Summary of Potential Hazardous Material and Hazardous Waste Impacts fromAlternative D................................................................................................................5-220Table 5-61 Summary of Potential Biological Impacts from Alternative D....................................5-224Table 5-62 Summary of Potential Impacts to Air Quality from Alternative D..............................5-230Table 5-63 Summary of Potential Impacts to Noise from Alternative D.......................................5-233Table 5-64 Summary of Potential Impacts to Airspace Resources from Alternative D.................5-237Table 5-65 Summary of Potential Impacts to Energy Demand and Generation fromAlternative D................................................................................................................5-239Table 5-66 Summary of Potential Impact to Facilities from Alternative D ...................................5-242Table 5-67 Summary of Potential Impacts to Subsistence from Alternative D .............................5-245Table 5-68 Summary of Cumulative Impacts to Each VEC for Each Alternative.........................5-247Table 6-1 Army Staff ......................................................................................................................6–1Table 6-2 ARCADIS U.S. Inc.........................................................................................................6–2FiguresFigure 2–1 Stryker Infantry Carrier Vehicle ...................................................................................2–10Figure 2–2 SBCT Project Locations in Hawaii...............................................................................2–21Figure 2–3 Current Location of Existing Cantonment Infrastructure Needed toSupport the 2/25 th ..........................................................................................................2–24Figure 2–4 Schofield Barracks Range Projects; Range projects other than the BattleArea Complex would be needed at SBMR under all Alternatives exceptthe No Action................................................................................................................2–27Figure 2–5 PTA Range Project Siting.............................................................................................2–28Figure 2–6 SBCT Project Locations in Alaska ...............................................................................2–30Figure 2–7 Existing Configuration of Garrison Infrastructure to Support the 2/25th SBCT ..........2–32Figure 2–8 Siting of Required Ranges (Machine Gun and Urban Assault) at Fort Richardson .....2–34Figure 2–9 Siting Location of the Parachute Storage and Rigging Facilities on Wheeler ArmyAirfield..........................................................................................................................2–36Figure 2–10 Standard Design and Doctrinal Configuration of an Infantry Platoon Battle Course...2–37Figure 2–11 Location of Jump Towers for the 4/25th IBCT (Airborne) ..........................................2–37Figure 2–12 Siting Location of the Heavy Drop Zone Required for the Support of the4/25th IBCT (Airborne) ................................................................................................2–38Figure 2–13 SBCT Project Locations in Colorado ...........................................................................2–40Figure 2–14 Current Garrison Footprint Area of the 4/4th IBCT .....................................................2–42Figure 2–15 Siting Constraints of the Battle Area Complex at PCMS and its ProjectileSurface Danger Zone ....................................................................................................2–44Figure 2–16 Locations of Firing Ranges Required to Support the Stationing of the 2/25 th SBCT ...2–45Figure 3–1 Region of Influence in Hawaii for Geology, Soils, Wildlife Management, CulturalResources, Land Use and Recreation, Hazardous Materials and Hazardous Wastes,Energy, and Facilities .....................................................................................................3–2Figure 3–2 Region of Influence in Alaska for Geology, Soils, Wildlife Management, CulturalResources, Land Use and Recreation, Hazardous Materials and Hazardous Wastes,Energy, and Facilities ...................................................................................................3–95Figure 3–3 Region of Influence in Colorado for Geology, Soils, Wildlife Management,Cultural Resources, Land Use and Recreation, Hazardous Materials andHazardous Wastes, Energy, and Facilities.................................................................. 3–137February 2008 xxxiv 2/25th SBCT Final EIS