SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

ContentsCHAPTER 6PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORS.........................................................................6–1CHAPTER 7 DISTRIBUTION AND REVIEW OF THE FEIS ...........................................................7-1CHAPTER 8CHAPTER 9REFERENCES CITED...................................................................................................8–1INDEX.............................................................................................................................9-1TablesTable 2–1 Stryker Brigade Combat Team Required Training Ranges ............................................2–4Table 2–2 2/25th SBCT and IBCT Annual Authorization for Training Ammunition.....................2–7Table 2–3 SBCT Training Land Requirement According to TC 25–1 Training Land....................2–7Table 2–4 Training Tasks for the SBCT (FM 7–1 Training the Force)...........................................2–8Table 2–5 Personnel and Equipment Breakdown ............................................................................2–9Table 2–6 Units in a Stryker Brigade ..............................................................................................2–9Table 2–7 Army Installations With Available Modernized Training Ranges ...............................2–14Table 2–8 Active Duty Army Installations That Have an Infantry Brigade Combat Team toExchange with Hawaii ..................................................................................................2–15Table 2–9 Remaining Installations After Special Mission Installations are Eliminatedfrom Further Consideration ..........................................................................................2–15Table 2–10 Maneuver and Training Land Availability Assuming Stationing of the 2/25that Each Installation........................................................................................................2–16Table 2–11 Installations Capable of Meeting Minimum Maneuver Land Thresholds ....................2–17Table 2–12 Comparison of Army Installation Stationing Locations ...............................................2–18Table 2–13 Summary and Status of Projects Analyzed in the 2004 EIS for theTransformation of the 2/25th ID (L).............................................................................2–22Table 2–14 Unit Equipment Comparisons — 4/25 th IBCT and 2/25 th SBCT..................................2–31Table 2–15 Unit Equipment Comparisons — 4/4 th IBCT and 2/25 th SBCT....................................2–39Table 2–16 Comparison of Soldiers and Equipment Assigned to the 2/25 th ID (L),4/25 th IBCT (Airborne), and 4/4 th IBCT .......................................................................2–49Table 3-1 State and National Ambient Air Quality Standards Applicable in Hawaii..................3–78Table 3-2 A-Weighted Decibel Values for Example Noise Sources ............................................3–84Table 3-3 CHPPM Blast Noise Assessment Criteria ....................................................................3–85Table 3-4 Maximum Permissible Noise Levels in Unincorporated El Paso County .................. 3–177Table 5-1 Summary of Impacts by Alternative................................................................................5-1Table 5-2 Summary of Potential Impacts from Alternative A .........................................................5-3Table 5-3 Summary of Potential Soil Erosion Impacts from Alternative A ....................................5-5Table 5-4 Summary of Potential Water Resource Impacts from Alternative A.............................5-17Table 5-5 Summary of Potential Impacts to Wildfire Management from Alternative A...............5-23Table 5-6 Summary of Potential Cultural Resources Impacts from Alternative A........................5-26Table 5-7 Summary of Potential Land Use and Recreation Impacts from Alternative A..............5-30Table 5-8 Summary of Potential Traffic and Transportation Impacts from Alternative A............5-34Table 5-9 Summary of Potential Impacts to Socioeconomics, Environmental Justice,and Protection of Children from Alternative A .............................................................5-37Table 5-10 EIFS Construction Model Output for Honolulu County................................................5-38Table 5-11 EIFS Construction Model output for Hawaii County ....................................................5-38Table 5-12 Summary of Potential Hazardous Material and Hazardous Waste Impacts fromAlternative A..................................................................................................................5-41February 2008 xxxii 2/25th SBCT Final EIS