SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

govsupport.us
from govsupport.us More from this publisher
10.07.2015 Views

Chapter 5 – Environmental Consequencescombination of steep slopes, easily erodible soils, and the damage or modification to land cover orsurface drainage that would occur due to use of the roads by SBCT vehicles during maneuver trainingcould increase the potential for slope failure. Concentrated use of the roads by the Stryker vehiclescould load weakly supported slopes and accelerate potential for slope failure in these areas.Stryker vehicles using the Helemano Trail to transport Soldiers during training activities at the SBMRBAX range would increase the potential for slope failure adjacent to the road. As described inChapter 3, this road has segments that traverse highly erosive soils or steep slopes.Use of the Dillingham Trail during maneuver training activities under in DMR would also increasethe potential for slope failure adjacent to the road. As described in Chapter 3, this road has segmentsthat traverse highly erosive soils or steep slopes. Most of Dillingham Trail would follow existingroads and would be on relatively gentle stable slopes. Parts of the proposed route would approach therim of the gulches of Poamoho Stream and Kaukonahua Stream. The route could cross areas ofunstable slopes, or construction of new roadways or modification of the existing roads could reduceslope stability through creation of new cuts and fills or drainage problems.Over the long term, use of Dillingham Trail by heavy vehicles may destabilize slopes in areasunderlain by soft saturated soils. In addition, vibrations caused by heavy vehicle use may inducefailure of unstable slopes, or loading on unstable steep slopes may induce failure of the roadway.Repair of failed slopes could require additional cutting, filling, or shoring, with the potential to alternatural land contours and drainage patterns further. Landslides themselves may become the locus offuture slides because the failed soil may be poorly drained. Some of the clay soils on the coastal plainnear DMR are not considered highly suitable for road fills and are subject to shrinking and swellingor soil creep (slow downslope movement in soils with low strength).Use of Drum Road during maneuver training activities in KTA could result in slope failures due tovibration or loading, but the proposed improvements to the road are expected to reduce these impactscompared to current conditions. Although there are many steep slopes within PTA and the KeamukuParcel, most slopes are underlain by shallow bedrock or exposed rock outcrops, so there is littlepotential for slope failure.Regulatory and Administrative Mitigation 6: Overall, the increased potential for slope failureresulting from use of roads and trails for SBCT maneuver training is considered potentiallysignificant because slope failure could alter the landscape, obstruct stream channels, interrupt use ofthe road, and create safety problems for personnel. Regular monitoring and early maintenance of theroadways and adjacent slopes, as mandated in the USAG-HI ITAM annual work plan, as well asproposed improvements to existing roads, however, would reduce the impact to less than significant.Less Than Significant ImpactsExposure to Soil Contaminants. Exposure to chemical contaminants in soils at maneuver trainingareas could occur through several pathways, including direct contact with contaminated soils,ingestion of soils, or through inhalation of windblown dust. Exposure estimates are based onassumptions about the amount of soil that might be ingested by a person who works in an area withcontaminated soils. It is a generally accepted principle of risk assessment that not all exposures resultin unacceptable health risks and that there are certain thresholds of exposure below which the healthrisks are so low that they cannot be distinguished from background risks. Results from soilsinvestigations conducted by the USAG-HI at SBMR and PTA in 2002 were discussed in Chapter 3and are summarized below as they relate to the potential for exposure during maneuver trainingactivities at the proposed BAX ranges and other maneuver areas.February 2008 5-14 2/25th SBCT Final EIS

Chapter 5 – Environmental ConsequencesAlthough a relatively small number of samples were collected to represent SBMR, the samples werecollected specifically from locations that were considered highly probable to represent the mostcontaminated sites. The sample results, therefore, represented above average concentrations onSBMR overall. RDX was detected in the highest relative concentrations among the chemicalsdetected, exceeding the PRG in two of 39 composite samples taken, which represented the highestconcentrations on the range. The actual exposures would be lower than assumed in the analysis.Arsenic was detected at levels slightly above the cancer industrial PRG, although the levels were wellbelow the non-cancer industrial PRG. Alternative A on SBMR is not expected to result in increasedexposure to these chemicals, because military personnel would not experience contact withcontaminated soils that is additional to existing contact levels or for durations (25 years) that triggerrisk under industrial soil PRGs. Moving SBCT maneuver training to SRAA would actually reducesome of the potential for exposure because it does not contain any of the most contaminated sites.With regard to pesticide use within the SRAA, USEPA did not find concentrations of farm chemicalsthat would raise concern for human exposure.The area of the proposed PTA BAX presents a potential opportunity for contact with contaminatedsoils. The construction of the BAX would require the conversion of a portion of Training Area 12 to atraining area where Soldiers could be exposed to the soils. Their exposure would be limited totraining for a period of days or weeks. The level of chemical compounds present at Range 12 are allbelow their respective PRGs. Considered together, the potential duration of exposure to the chemicalconcentrations on the training ranges at PTA, including Range 12, represent a low risk to personnelwho use them.Composite soil sampling at selected ranges within PTA revealed the presence of metals, explosives,and semi-volatile organic compounds. The observed concentrations were generally lower thanindustrial PRGs. One explosive compound, RDX, was detected in samples from Ranges 5 and 9 atconcentrations above the industrial PRG, while Training Area 12 was below that. The risks frommultiple chemical exposures are additive, and similar calculations can be done for each of thecontaminants to which people may be exposed at PTA. The risks from HMX, nitroglycerin, and TNTare very small compared to the risk from RDX, and the sum of their risks is lower than 0.74 x 10-6.The risks associated with each of the metals can be calculated similarly, and the results would besimilar. The highest risks are associated with the iron and aluminum in the soil, both of which occurnaturally at high concentrations.Overall, the sum of the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks, based on the available soil samplingdata and using the PRGs to estimate risk, is lower than the USEPA threshold for worker exposure. Itis unlikely that troop exposures to RDX or other chemicals on the ranges would be similar to workerexposures in an industrial setting. For example, workers are assumed to ingest 100 mg of soil per day,250 days per year, for 25 years. This assumption over-estimates troop exposures because troops arelikely to be exposed only temporarily, and only for short durations. Minimal public contact with thesesoils would occur. It is based on the assumption that the highest concentration of windblown dustwould be close to the source (i.e., the maneuver areas) that are off-limits to the general public. Thefarther away from the source, the more dilution occurs. The Army is also implementing a Dust andSoils Mitigation Monitoring Plan (DuSMMoP) for inhalable PM 10 emissions (see section 5.2.11 AirQuality) and will also implement fugitive dust control through engineering oroperational/administrative controls. Based on the conservative analysis described above, thisrepresents a less than significant impact.Volcanic and Seismic Hazards. Portions of the areas that would be impacted by maneuver training aresubject to volcanic eruptions, lava flows, occasional explosive eruptions, volcanic gas venting, andearthquakes. Alternative A would increase the hazard associated with these conditions because itFebruary 2008 5-15 2/25th SBCT Final EIS

Chapter 5 – Environmental Consequencescombination of steep slopes, easily erodible soils, and the damage or modification to land cover orsurface drainage that would occur due to <strong>us</strong>e of the roads by <strong>SBCT</strong> vehicles during maneuver trainingcould increase the potential for slope failure. Concentrated <strong>us</strong>e of the roads by the Stryker vehiclescould load weakly supported slopes and accelerate potential for slope failure in these areas.Stryker vehicles <strong>us</strong>ing the Helemano Trail to transport Soldiers during training activities at the SBMRBAX range would increase the potential for slope failure adjacent to the road. As described inChapter 3, this road has segments that traverse highly erosive soils or steep slopes.Use of the Dillingham Trail during maneuver training activities under in DMR would also increasethe potential for slope failure adjacent to the road. As described in Chapter 3, this road has segmentsthat traverse highly erosive soils or steep slopes. Most of Dillingham Trail would follow existingroads and would be on relatively gentle stable slopes. Parts of the proposed route would approach therim of the gulches of Poamoho Stream and Kaukonahua Stream. The route could cross areas ofunstable slopes, or construction of new roadways or modification of the existing roads could reduceslope stability through creation of new cuts and fills or drainage problems.Over the long term, <strong>us</strong>e of Dillingham Trail by heavy vehicles may destabilize slopes in areasunderlain by soft saturated soils. In addition, vibrations ca<strong>us</strong>ed by heavy vehicle <strong>us</strong>e may inducefailure of unstable slopes, or loading on unstable steep slopes may induce failure of the roadway.Repair of failed slopes could require additional cutting, filling, or shoring, with the potential to alternatural land contours and drainage patterns further. Landslides themselves may become the loc<strong>us</strong> offuture slides beca<strong>us</strong>e the failed soil may be poorly drained. Some of the clay soils on the coastal plainnear DMR are not considered highly suitable for road fills and are subject to shrinking and swellingor soil creep (slow downslope movement in soils with low strength).Use of Drum Road during maneuver training activities in KTA could result in slope failures due tovibration or loading, but the proposed improvements to the road are expected to reduce these impactscompared to current conditions. Although there are many steep slopes within PTA and the KeamukuParcel, most slopes are underlain by shallow bedrock or exposed rock outcrops, so there is littlepotential for slope failure.Regulatory and Administrative Mitigation 6: Overall, the increased potential for slope failureresulting from <strong>us</strong>e of roads and trails for <strong>SBCT</strong> maneuver training is considered potentiallysignificant beca<strong>us</strong>e slope failure could alter the landscape, obstruct stream channels, interrupt <strong>us</strong>e ofthe road, and create safety problems for personnel. Regular monitoring and early maintenance of theroadways and adjacent slopes, as mandated in the USAG-HI ITAM annual work plan, as well asproposed improvements to existing roads, however, would reduce the impact to less than significant.Less Than Significant ImpactsExposure to Soil Contaminants. Exposure to chemical contaminants in soils at maneuver trainingareas could occur through several pathways, including direct contact with contaminated soils,ingestion of soils, or through inhalation of windblown d<strong>us</strong>t. Exposure estimates are based onassumptions about the amount of soil that might be ingested by a person who works in an area withcontaminated soils. It is a generally accepted principle of risk assessment that not all exposures resultin unacceptable health risks and that there are certain thresholds of exposure below which the healthrisks are so low that they cannot be distinguished from background risks. Results from soilsinvestigations conducted by the USAG-HI at SBMR and PTA in 2002 were disc<strong>us</strong>sed in Chapter 3and are summarized below as they relate to the potential for exposure during maneuver trainingactivities at the proposed BAX ranges and other maneuver areas.February 2008 5-14 2/25th <strong>SBCT</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!